In
May 1998 the Council issued a report to
Senator Carol Moseley-Braun and Senator Richard Durbin which included our evaluation reports of the three candidates chosen by the Senators' merit selection panel to be the finalist for selection as the next federal district court judge in the Northern District. Hon. William J. Hibbler and
Matthew F. Kennelly were recommended by the Senators to the President for two vacancies on the District Court for the Northern District. The following are the Council's evaluations of Judge William J. Hibbler and Matthew F. Kennelly.
Matthew F. Kennelly -- Qualified
Matthew F. Kennelly, 41, is a 1981 graduate of the Harvard Law School. Following law school Mr. Kennelly served briefly as an associate at Latham & Watkins doing civil commercial litigation. He then served for two years as a Law Clerk to U.S. District Judge Prentice H. Marshall. From 1984 to the present, Mr. Kennelly has practiced with Cotsirilos, Stephenson, Tighe & Streiker, Ltd., where he specializes in criminal and commercial civil litigation. He is active in many civic activities, including the Lawyers' Committee for Better Housing where he served as president of the board of directors for eight years. He has received numerous awards for his pro bono participation in the defense of Rolando Cruz.
Mr. Kennelly has handled a wide variety of complex civil and criminal cases as a practitioner. As we found in our 1997 evaluation, he is uniformly considered to have an exceptional intellect and received high marks from everyone we interviewed for his legal ability on
complex matters, his trial skills, and his judgment. He also has strong legal writing skills, which further demonstrate his legal writing and scholarship. His adversaries consistently praise him for his professionalism. His integrity, intelligence, and fairness are unquestioned. He is considered to be exceptionally hard-working.
We also have received numerous comments about the maturity and poise that Mr. Kennelly exhibits during even complex litigation matters. During his evaluation interview, we were particularly impressed with the thoughtfulness of his answers on a variety of subjects relating to the role and responsibilities of a federal district judge.
His devotion to public interest matters is admirable and, in general, is considered to be an excellent practitioner. He has the experiences and ability to be an outstanding U.S. District Judge. We find him qualified.
http://www.chicagocouncil.org/ccl/index.htm