Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark supporter asks Dean & Kucinich supporters:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Toronto Ron Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:34 PM
Original message
Clark supporter asks Dean & Kucinich supporters:
When is it time to unite behind the candidate with the best chance who did not vote for IWR, Patriot Act, Tax Giveaway to the Wealthy, No Child Left Behind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. After the convention
Edited on Wed Feb-04-04 01:42 PM by no name no slogan
And btw, it's not only those issues you mentioned above (although Clark has some issues with IWR, and would continue the Iraq occupation indefinately).

It's also about:

* Getting out of IRAQ ASAP
* Cutting the bloated military budget, and spending the funds on a REAL national security plan,
* NAFTA (and CAFTA) and the WTO
* Universal, single-payer healthcare
* A full-employment economy
* a free public education, K-college, for all who want it
* rebuiling this country's crumbling infrastructure

NOBODY else is addressing these issues right now like DK is-- not Clark, not Kerry, not Dean, not Edwards. Sharpton is, to some extent, but he doesn't have the programs that DK does.

DK raised as much $$ as Clark did in Q4 2003, and regularly draws hundreds (if not thousands) to his appearances-- but you wouldn't know that from the NYT or other media sources, because they REFUSE to cover him.

Clark is a fine candidate, but he's not the one who'll not only beat Bush, but put this country on the road to REAL change. So I'll stick with DK for now, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. It won't be before I vote for Kucinich in the CA primary...
Don't hold your breath till after March 2nd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. right now!
vote Kucinich for President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great question
and one that should be answered by the candidates. I was wondering the same thing last night and it seems to me that at some point (soon) if these distinctions are as important to the candidates as they are to you and me, that they have an obligation to put their egos aside and decide how they can consolidate the grassroots/anti-establishment support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Enough

First of all I'd be willing to bet that ZERO Kucinich supporters will be jumping ship before the convention (or if he drops out). And I've seen a few Dean supporters jumping ship, but not many.

The time to unite is at the convention.

And sorry, but Gen. Clark cannot claim those credentials (didn't vote for x, y, or z) when he could not possibly have voted for them. You'll have to do much better than that, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. My own opinion
People should be left to decide these things for themselves. They don't need coaxing or coaching from us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. I will never unite behind a cannidate who supports american imperalism via
Edited on Wed Feb-04-04 01:42 PM by corporatewhore
free trade and the school of accomplished assasins who"enforce" it and supported the continued bombing of vieques
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hey, you're welcome to become a "Kucitizen" anytime you want!
Since, of course, Dennis was the only one of those three (Kucinich, Clark, Dean) who actually had to cast a vote on all of those issues!

Additionally, Dennis was the one who led the effort to get well over half of all House Democrats to vote against the IWR! I don't remember Dean or Clark pulling something like that off.

Oh... I get it now. You're saying that those of us who support Dean or Kucinich should abandon OUR candidate and support YOURS.

No thanks. I think I'll stay right where I am -- with the TRUE trailblazer in the race, and the only candidate willing to really change things. I'll stay with the candidate who has denounced DU weapons, and proposes cutting the Pentagon budget by significant amounts. I'll stay with the candidate who truly envisions America taking a role of cooperation with the rest of the world rather than returning to the days of soft multilateralism and realpolitik that got us into our current mess in the first place.

Of course, you're welcome to come join us in the Kucinich camp anytime you want! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoppin_Mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. When your candidiate endorses that person -nt-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. I am with DK
until the convention, and after for that matter (the movement!). I will support whoever is the nominee but I am not anywhere near ready to go to someone else, not even close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. At the convention
Second ballot for Presidential nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iowapeacechief Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. You are welcome to join us...
...Kucitizens when your guy drops out.

We are going to Boston.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. If Kerry or Edwards really bothered me, I'd consider.
Clark is my second choice and all, but Kerry & Edwards don't bother me enough to abandon DK over.

I think Kerry has actually been successful in getting out the antiwar message even though he supported IWR. I have no idea how, but it's sinked in. Not to take ANY credit away from Dean, Clark, & of course Kucinich - plus all the insiders coming forward recently. Opinion about the war is definately shifting, so IWR really doesn't matter anymore. We can still hang Bush on that damn war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Can you at least wait until Clark has more delgates than Dean?
It's a little silly to imply that Dean should drop out when he currently has more delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. After the convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. That's all three of them! Which one to unite behind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. Goodness--you make it sound as though he had a choice in the matter!
Edited on Wed Feb-04-04 02:05 PM by Mairead
:) They don't let people who have no political office vote on those issues. So his opposition is at most asserted and not at all proven. That makes a difference. Or should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC