Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gay Marriage Ban: ReligiousRW Seeks Constitutional Convention w/o Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:48 PM
Original message
Gay Marriage Ban: ReligiousRW Seeks Constitutional Convention w/o Congress
Edited on Thu Jun-15-06 12:49 PM by Totally Committed
Religious Right Seeks Unprecedented Constitutional Convention To Ban Gay Marriage Without Congress

Earlier this month, efforts to ban gay marriage by amending the Constitution failed badly in Senate. Now the religious right is considering appealing to state legislatures to call a Constitutional Convention under an obscure provision of Article 5 that would allow amendments to the Constitution without congressional approval. The Evans-Novak report has the details:

Meeting after the big failure at the offices of the social-conservative Family Research Council, the top leaders of the marriage movement — Catholic, Protestant and Mormon leaders among others — discussed the possibility of an unprecedented Constitutional Convention. Two-thirds (34) of the state legislatures would have to call for such a convention — which could be done only with great difficulty. Even then, no one knows what such a convention would look like or what sort of amendments could result from it.


Right-wing pundit Bob Novak, who writes the report, appears to be pushing the idea even as he calls it “rather fanciful.” Novak argues banning gay marriage through a constitutional convention would be difficult but not impossible:

If such a convention were to pass a marriage amendment, we estimate that 28 states would easily ratify it. Another eight states may do so only after a protracted and bloody political fight (which could span an election cycle). That leaves supporters with two more states to go to reach the threshold of 38 (three-fourths), and only the most difficult ground to fight on — states such as Maine, Rhode Island, Oregon and Nevada are probably not ideal places to win such a fight, although not all would be unwinnable.


Novak notes that such a convention would give liberals the opportunity to write their own amendments. He’s convinced, however, “that there are more than 13 states with legislatures willing to block anything too far out on the left.” That’s a relief.

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/15/constitutional-convention-gay-marriage/

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Take away tax exemptions.
If they're gonna start politicking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. That is a very scary thought - The Constitution of the Theocracy of
America - as written by Dobson, Falwell, Phelps and the rest of the multi-trillion $$ religion industry\


(and yes, I throw Phelps right in the middle of the rest of them - they simply know how to mask their hatred better through being more civil)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 01:01 PM
Original message
if somehow there was a convention
where those (insert words of your choice here) had that kind of power, I can only imagine 2 options...leave or revolt.

Of course, it won't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The scariest thought for me is that not only this unprecedented,
but is being sought to happen out from under the oversight from Congress. If this is granted, we will definitely know we have gone officially to Theocracy as out form of government.

This comes on a day when news from the Supreme Court says no-knock searches of American households is legal.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. These would be the same folks screaming to leave it to the legislature
and not have the judges decide it.

So, last week when the Senators didn't approve what they wanted - they want to do their own thing. hmmm, more hypocrisy, why am I not surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-15-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Welcome to the Republic of Gilead.
My guess is that the capital will be located in Colorado Springs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC