6. Leopold says he still stands by his story (at the time it was written)
fitz has to release the letter before he will retract his story. Says some guy (didn't catch name) on NBC said he was convinced rove would be indicted. More questions than answers. What has happened (what did rove do) during the last five weeks (since I wrote my story?) If the investigation continues, "something was going on behind the scenes." I will not release the identity of my sources. If something changed in rove's favor how does that make me wrong five weeks ago? Cooperation behind the scenes. My sources are communicating with me now and they are telling me there is still a sealed indictment against rove. The decision to protect my sources has not been made on my own. The story was correct when I originally published it. I'm not the only one who reported that. Interview in a nutshell. Hope it helps. He didn't sound very convincing.
Leopold says the issue is "Rove's atty made a statement, apparently he claims that there is a letter that Fitz sent him...also reports of a phone call...'
"He needs to release that letter. Until I hear from Fitz that this is what's goin on, I;'m not going to budge from my position."
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.