Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Voting Reform: Without It, the Next Election Is Also Doomed(Rolling Stone)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:44 PM
Original message
Voting Reform: Without It, the Next Election Is Also Doomed(Rolling Stone)
Edited on Tue Jun-06-06 06:24 PM by Up2Late
(EAC stands for "Election Assistance Commission". This is the latest 2004 Election Interview from the Rolling Stone section call National Affairs Daily. This is related to the RFK Jr. article.)

6/6/06, 3:29 pm EST

Voting Reform: Without It, the Next Election Is Also Doomed


2004 Election Interview: The Rev. DeForest Soaries]
Republican DeForest Soaries served as the first chair of the federal Election Assistance Commission, set up in the wake of the Florida fiasco of 2000 to oversee ongoing reform of American voting. The agency was constantly underfunded: “We really had to put together a federal agency with spit,” Soaries says, “when that agency was supposed to bring about reforms in voting for federal elections.”The EAC was supposed to ensure that the billions in federal funds spent on new voting technology was spent wisely: “There are legitimate questions in circulation about the integrity of electronic voting,” he says, “and the reality is that no one really knows the answers. Because we don’t have enough research, and the research budget that was authorized by the Congress for the EAC to get to the bottom of these issues was completely zeroed out in the appropriations. The EAC itself was only authorized through last year. So what serious person would accept an appointment to a federal agency that’s no longer authorized?”

Soaries resigned a year ago in disgust, calling the Bush administration and the Republican-controlled Congress uncommitted to improving America’s sorry election apparatus. This May, National Affairs Daily talked with Soaries, who is speaking out after a year of self-imposed silence.

ROLLING STONE: What led you to resign?

DeForest Soaries: It wasn’t until I worked in Washington on an issue as generic as this that I realized how pitiful and perhaps how hopeless Washington really is. For God’s sake…if any issue should be the catalyst for bipartisan cooperation, this is the issue: voting.

It was probably the worst experience of my life. I found that there is very little interest in Washington for true election reform. That neither the White House nor either house of the Congress seems to be as committed to guaranteeing democratic participation in this country as we seem to be in other countries. It’s an embarrassment that we don’t have a broad enough consensus among political leaders that true reform should take place. I could count the members of Congress on one hand that took these issues seriously....

(more at link)

<http://rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs>

Note: if the link no longer goes to the interview above, try this link: <http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs/?p=177>

(Also, if you scroll down past this article, you will find a Howard Dean interview from yesterday too.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick for updated OP Headline.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nice try, Up2Late
But it seems folks just don't care that the $4 billion spent by congress has lead to their votes being stolen. Yeah, $4 billion and they zeroed out the one commission that was supposed to be a check on what was being bought.

We wuz screwed, and folks seem to like it. Nice try. Move along, nothing to see here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But, but....
People NEED to care!

Maybe the night people will care.:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I just kicked the other thread. Most important issue there is.
Everything else connects to it one way or another - or will, eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. count me in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Link update
Here's the more permanent link, I don't think the OP link will be any good tomorrow: <http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs/?p=176>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. I remember thinking at that time...
....4 years ago, that not funding the EAC was a good thing.

Of course, I hadn't a clue about HAVA, then.

Well, now we know the e-voting vendors are laughing all the way to the bank, having sold HAVA machines that were never inspected, or completely vetted.

And Tom Delay has to be smiling, knowing what a bag of crap he left on America's doorstep.

So it goes. HAVA has a reform bill waiting in the wings; a bill that would begin to wash that bag of crap off the door sill, but the dems are afraid to look at it, or even much acknowledge it.

I only wish I could get my hand into that bag and spread it on the floor of congress.... wearing gloves, of course!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Or just set it on fire!
Sorry, your post reminded me of the "Flaming bag of Dog Crap in the front porch" trick where, when the home owner finds it, they stamp it out, but get a shoe covered in crap in return. :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC