Here's what I don't get.

[closeupready]

So in Wisconsin, the "preferred behavior" is going to be taught as abstinence.

Yet, at the same time, the xtian fundie crowd screams about gays and "the homoseckhul lifestyle" that it's non-procreational.

So here you go, a sex education class that teaches sex is bad, don't do it. Isn't abstinence promoting non-procreation?

What a bunch of lunatics they are. :mad:

[sinkingfeeling]

1. Ah, you don't see the beauty of the 'church' teaching the world that a

natural act (sex) is evil and Satanic? Remember, before there was a 'church' to deal with, there was all that honor and wonderment directed at the Goddess. The 'church' had to wipe out everything connected with the natural to have the super-natural.

[panader0]

2. Sounda like you read "The Da Vinci Code" I agree Love women

[sinkingfeeling]

4. Yes, I've read "The Da Vinci Code", but also read several great

books on women and religion way back in the early '70's. The golden era of Women's Lib!! I remember one that was about the Goddess and how the 'church' destroyed nearly everything related to her worship.

[closeupready]

3. Right, it's about control and regulation.

Because if it really was about procreation, sex and fertility would be celebrated. And we all know they don't do THAT.