Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gore speaks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 08:24 PM
Original message
Gore speaks
Al Gore, the new king of all media, speaks:

...you know the temptation to reject the truth and try to manufacture your own reality is what got us into Iraq — it's what got us into these deficits. At some point, reality has its day. I hope they'll change. I think there is a chance they'll change. You know Winston Churchill once said that the American people generally do the right thing after first exhausting every other alternative. And maybe after exhausting every other alternative, Bush will do the right thing on this. I'm not going to hold my breath, but I do think that there's a chance.

I can't look into their (Bush's and Rove's) hearts — I'll let the grand jury do that. I'm sorry, I shouldn't have said that.


___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gore should be our next President. He has changed for the
better. He was wise but now wise beyond his time. And, I think he has earned our admiration and respect and deserves to lead us. He will be our knight in armor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He IS our president. But the courts refused to let him serve.
He would have been re-elected in '04 had he been allowed to serve as the American people elected him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. funny guy
Q:And you inject some humor into your presentation.

Gore: It’s hard to believe—I benefit from low expectations.

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. He's a guy I wouldn't have a beer with....
I'd have a beer and he his 'something-besides-beer' while we went over the self-correcting nature of civilization.

And we would probably lament the short-sightedness of the race that has brought us here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gore/Kerry '08. The Poetic Justice ticket.
Just thought I'd put it out there again. It would be such a joy to have a president who remembers what Winston Churchill said--and a president and v-p who were actually elected.

Question: What is the "this" that he hopes Bush will do the right thing about? Treasongate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I wonder if Clark would be Gore's VP
That might be a juggernaut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. We have several very strong Democrats that would be great
VP candidates on the ticket with Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. I love that ticket, thought I was the only one.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. Gore/Kerry'08 I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think if this guy wants the nomination, he begins with a very
powerful showing in Iowa.

Right now the media is fawning over Sen. Clinton. And she does have the bucks and many connections.

But there is a sort of moral imperative to a Gore candidacy after the theft of Florida in 2000.

Katherine Harris. Jeb Bush. Jim Baker. Karl Rove.

That bunch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. There is something about the though of Gore being elected
President that is very appealing. It's not just that Gore himself has matured into real statesman, it's that the political climate has changed in ways that make legitimate, intelligent and caring people like Gore stand out. His time is coming. Let's let him know that we are ready for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. If Al Gore winds up at the top of our ticket, he has my vote. He
already has my respect and admiration.

The environment has always been an extremely important issue for me, and I love Democrats who champion it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
38. here here! well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Gore will win by acclimation. One over looked event.
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 11:02 PM by autorank
When H. Clinton spoke in NY recently, protesters challenged her on her pro-Iraq resolution vote.

She came back with something very close to "Sometimes you have to make a tough decision."

It's out there, on record. :wtf: "tough decision" ? How about "IDIOTIC decision."

Under pressure, she's reflexively defensive. That's fine, she made a choice and should
defend it. However, it was her choice. It was a bad choice. It was a disastrous choice.

Nobody who voted for that resolution, no matter how many mea culpas they do, will be
tagged as a loser.

Gore opposed the war. Dean opposed the war. Clark opposed the war. Kucinich opposed the war.

Take your pick, I pick Gore but I'm grateful to each of them and the Senators who just said NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Hey, autorank. On Sen. Clinton. She could surprise me and clear the
table in Iowa. My predictions aren't always that good. I thought Dick Gephardt, then later Howard Dean, would win in Iowa, and neither did.

On the other hand, it could be Sen. Clinton who's surprised. There's a case to be made that she will rise or hold steady for another year or so and then as the winter of 2007-08 begins to come around, she could plateau out and begin to drop a little.

A reasonably well-financed charge from just about anyone else could upset her in Iowa and New Hampshire.

A case could be made that the results of the Iowa caucus would be a wild scramble among (in no particular order):

Gore, Edwards, Bayh, Feingold, Kerry, Clark, HClinton, Richardson, Biden, Vilsack, etc.

I'm not seeing that as a really inviting theater for HClinton to emerge as a "frontrunner."

If any one of those others places ahead of her, she is no longer frontrunner, and whoever places ahead of her will capture the momentum for the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Hey buddy,
Geez, just ready to hit the sack and I read a rational argument for Ms. HRC winning Iowa.

If she moves into Iowa and fails, she's toast. If she's in a pack and wins, then the opposition coalesces around her.

"as the winter of 2007-08 begins to come around, she could plateau out and begin to drop a little."
That sounds right to me for a couple of reasons. First, MSM won't have the sway it has even now. At that point, she'll only have name recognition and Big Dog nostalgia going for her. So she'll have to fade a bit. Second, a candidate may find his or her voice and just blow her out of the water: "Voice" as in populist voice. There are only three known Democrats who are ideologically able to do this: Dean, Clark, and my main main Gore. Clark's too intellectual, Dean's doing too good a job w/DNC and will probably stick around, so it's up to Gore. He cleans her clock.

Now the caveat. If any of these three potential populists makes serious inroads against Hillary, watch corporate America and MSM drop Hillary like an old shoe and push Biden as the handsome, firebrand of American revival. A rational president, one who can't be co-opted, will draw down defense and spend on saving the planet. Since private sector jobs are down .6 million since 2000 and government sector up 2.9 million, we're in a garrison state economy. Corporate America finds Biden easy to dance to and he'd trumpet the need for a "strong defense."

A couple of island nations sink, another round of mega hurricanes, and maybe a lake or two catching fire because they're so filthy and we're looking at real awareness of our dire straits. In that case, Bush is excelled to Dubai and Gore crushes all competition. Clark for Secretary of state, Dean at HHS and we're rokken into good times.

We'll see. I'm voting as though my life depends on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Our lives WILL depend on it.
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Me, too, and I'm with you on the urgency.
You have a good night and I'll catch you on these boards soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. She asked if he admired anything about bush-
"I have to confess that I fear I’m losing some objectivity where he’s concerned...."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R. That's a great interview.
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 09:03 PM by Rose Siding
He speaks as though he's taken the time to write out and frame the answers. What a smart man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. My President is so articulate -
AND funny - "I'll let the grand jury do that" :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. For people who think that all politicians are the same...
We'll be way beyond Thunderdome before Bush or Cheney talks this way about Big Oil:

"The behavior of ExxonMobil is disgraceful. They finance in whole or in part 40 organizations that put out disinformation on global warming designed to confuse the American people. There has emerged in the last couple of decades a lobbying strategy that is based on trying to control perceptions. In some sense it's not new, but it's new in the sophistication and the amount of resources they devote to it. It's not new in the sense it's the same thing the tobacco industry did after the surgeon general's report of 1964, and that is a major part of the reason why the Bush administration doesn't do anything. The president put their chief guy in charge of environmental policy in the White House."

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. We are really close to being beyond Thunderdome -
but I don't expect any of the repukes will get it.

I've boycotted Exxon (now ExxonMobil) since March 24, 1989. They still haven't paid the judgement for what they did to Prince William Sound.

Exxon folks are not very welcome by us commoners here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Gore-Feingold 2008 (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. That's the ticket!
___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. I'm SO WITH YOU ON THAT ONE.
Couldn't have said it any better, myself.

Here's your visual for the day:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. I hope you don't mind if I steal that pic!
That's my preferred ticket right there - I would work 24/7/365 for Al Gore, and if Feingold is the Veep - well, that would be proof that there is a Great Creator out there somewhere!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. I would be there with you 24/7/365 working for Al Gore 2008

and Feingold is gold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. "Hearts" what hearts? Good luck findin them. GORE2008. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Re-elect Al Gore.
It is time that he take his rightful place as the leader of our country.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. !
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. Great article. Clark has also been taking up the global warming issue
recently. I have a great deal of respect for Gore. He's a man of such decency, intelligence, and integrity.

I'm really looking forward to the new film, as well as the book. I read the other day that Clark had been reading "The Weather Makers," which addresses global climate change, and he's done some podcasts on the issue.

Gore deserves a lot of credit for being the first really public figure to bring the issue of global warming to the forefront of our consciousness. I hope we keep hearing from him for a long time to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
29. OMG, I miss Gore!! He's got the knowledge, commonn sense and...
....level headedness that we so desperately need these days.:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
30. K&R for my President! Gore/Feingold 08!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
32. Here is Al's answer to those that believe
Edited on Sat Apr-29-06 11:04 AM by Uncle Joe
he did not speak of the environment while running for President.


"In 2000 and in 1988 when you ran, you really didn’t talk about the environment that much. I think you were counseled that it was not a good issue. Any regrets about that?"

"That’s the conventional wisdom that I want to challenge because in both cases I talked about it extensively. And to take 2000 as an example, there were numerous speeches and events and proposals and multipoint plans that were not considered news, and if a tree falls in the forest and it’s not heard, then later on people think it didn’t happen. John Kerry went thru a very similar experience in ’04 because the way the issue has been covered has been plagued with some of the adjectives that you began with—it’s marginal, it’s arcane, it’s irrelevant, ridiculous—and so if a daily news cycle is devoted to that issue, then one candidate has his message out there and the other is mysteriously missing. There’s another factor that’s often overlooked in 2000. Then governor George W. Bush publicly pledged to regulate CO2 emissions and to forcibly, with the rule of law, reduce them—and publicly said "this is a serious problem and I will deal with it." Now, the other way that issues get covered in the media is if there’s conflict, and if there’s a sharp difference. And one is tempted to conclude that Rove crafted those positions that were immediately abandoned after the election—in the first week after the inauguration, the first week—one is tempted to conclude that Rove wrote those positions in order to take from that issue any sense of contrast or conflict and thereby make it non-newsworthy. It certainly had that effect, whether it was intentional or not. I can’t look into their hearts—I’ll let the grand jury do that. I’m sorry, I shouldn’t have said that."



:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
34. Did I mention that I adore AL GORE?
He has evolved into one kickass candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
35. Al needs to call for an end to the war in Iraq ...
and he needs to speak out on Iran ...

on everything else, he's looking good ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
36. Gore hit another home run with that one
and got the attention of the media by doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC