Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Defence [sic] secretary 'should go' (make it seven Generals)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 06:30 PM
Original message
US Defence [sic] secretary 'should go' (make it seven Generals)
Edited on Sat Apr-15-06 06:31 PM by ProSense

US Defence secretary 'should go'

From correspondents in Washington

April 16, 2006
This article from : Agence France-Presse
A former NATO commander Saturday joined six other retired generals in calling for Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's resignation.

"I believe secretary Rumsfeld hasn't done an adequate job. He should go," General Wesley Clark told Fox News Channel in an interview.

Gen Clark said Mr Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney had pushed the United States into Iraq, and said the invasion "had no connection" with the war on terror".

"They pressed for this, they pressed for open warfare before the diplomacy was finished," said the retired general and Fox News analyst.

"It was a tragic mistake, a strategic blunder."

Asked whether it was appropriate to comment on the defence secretary's performance while the United States is at war, Gen Clark replied: "It's more than an appropriate time. This country needed a better policy from the 2001 period on.

more...

http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/story/0,20797,18829526-5003402,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. The British spelling "defence"
Thank you General Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Atta Boy Wes!
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't matter what the Generals say.....* will not get rid of Rummy
Common sense would dictate that he should go...because of all of his failures....but * is not logical...he is dangerous too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not so sure
With both House and Senate vulnerable, * may have to cast Rummy overboard to keep the GOP afloat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. One can only hope...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you for standing up, Candidate Clark...
Backbone, that. Love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here are Clark's full comments:
You can go to Clark's own web site if you want to view the video or listen to an audio tape of them: http://securingamerica.com/node/859



Jamie Colby: Six retired generals now calling for Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to resign. They claim he mismanaged the war in Iraq but do other retired generals agree?


Well, joining us on the phone from Little Rock, Arkansas, retired NATO commander and Fox News analyst, General Wesley Clark. General, good afternoon.


GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Good afternoon.


Jamie Colby: Thanks for being with us. Let me ask you first, is it appropriate for a former general to comment on the Defense Secretary's performance when we're at war?


GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Of course it's appropriate. In fact, it's more than appropriate. It's their responsibility to provide the access to the American public to military information and ideas. Not disclose classified information but to give their honest opinion. If called on or to volunteer it - that's a democracy and they have some specialized information and it's a good thing that they share it.


Jamie Colby: Well as a former general as well, what is your take on Secretary Rumsfeld's leadership?


GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Well, I ran for president in 2004 because I felt that the administration's entire direction of policy with regard to the war on terror was a mistake. We should have fought in Afghanistan and finished off Osama bin Laden. The war in Iraq was unnecessary. Secretary Rumsfeld was the officer in charge as the Secretary of Defense. He's the number 2 in the chain of command to the president and I believe Secretary Rumsfeld hasn't done an adequate job. He should go.


Jamie Colby: When you look at the position of number 2, can you put into perspective the need to follow the orders of the commander in chief versus the ability to present a different strategy?


GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Well certainly. I mean, I ran to be president of the United States because I thought the commander in chief should be replaced. Ultimately he's the person responsible. The American people didn't understand how bad the situation was in the election of 2004. Now these generals are taking it upon themselves to speak out on behalf of people who are still in the army. They're relating their experiences and they feel like they haven't…that people in uniform were not listened to. That we didn't go in with enough troops; we didn't have the right approach for the inter-agency; we don't have a policy process to reinforce the military efforts with diplomatic efforts in the regions. All of these things ultimately come back to the president but his right hand man is Don
Rumsfeld.


Jamie Colby: Would you, if you would General, listen to what Secretary Rumsfeld has to say? I have some sound that I want to play.


GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Sure.


<Audio of Defense Secretary Rumsfeld>: There are people on the outside who are retired who look back and say 'oh this or that' and that's fine, they can do that but it doesn't make them right.


Jamie Colby: So point blank General, should Secretary Rumsfeld go?


GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Yes. <crosstalk>


Jamie Colby: And is this an appropriate time for that with our soldiers in combat?


GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: I think that it's more than an appropriate time. This country needed a better policy from the 2001 period on. We should have stayed in Afghanistan and finished it. Rumsfeld and Vice President Cheney wanted us to go to Iraq. It had no connection to the war on terror. They pressed for this, they pressed for open warfare before the diplomacy was finished. It was a tragic mistake. It's a strategic blunder. It was wrong and the American people just didn't understand it or they wouldn't have reelected George Bush. They did…reelect him. Now these officers are saying 'at least give us somebody in the military chain of command who will listen.' That's why Secretary Rumsfeld has lost their confidence. He's made bad policy choices. It's time for new leadership.


Jamie Colby: Alright, General Wesley Clark on the phone from Arkansas. Thanks for being with us and for weighing in on something that was the talk of…not only on the air but certainly in Washington this week. Thank you so much.


GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Thank you.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thank you General Clark....
Edited on Sat Apr-15-06 07:37 PM by FrenchieCat
Thank you for taking the heat by speaking out when it wasn't "Fashionable"....when you were the only
General in the kitchen! :patriot:

They all have got to go....which is why General Clark ran for President in '04. So Clark is saying and did say "Rumsfeld and his boss and the VP and whomever else is responsible for this shit we are looking at today......."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. The only problem Chimpy has
with getting rid of Rummy is choosing his successor--will it be a croney? Will it be a relative? Imagine Neil B. as defense secretary...or maybe Pierce Bush can manage to get up early enough in the morning, ya know what I,m sayin, ¿Sorry, I,m on a keyboard in a different country and can×t figure out where all the punctuations are`.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. keep em going!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. 7- 'hundreds and thousands" (per Rummy)--just another bad apple to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC