Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Radio: "Facts have proven Democrats wrong, 5.1 million times over"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:20 AM
Original message
Bush Radio: "Facts have proven Democrats wrong, 5.1 million times over"
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/04/20060415.html

Read the 04-01-06 Address HERE: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/04/20060401.html

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Monday is Tax Day, and that means many of you are busy finishing up your tax returns. The good news is that this year Americans will once again keep more of their hard-earned dollars because of the tax cuts we passed in 2001 and 2003.

An important debate is taking place in Washington over whether to keep these tax cuts in place or to raise your taxes. For the sake of American workers and their families, and for our entrepreneurs, I believe Congress needs to make the tax relief permanent.

Our economy prospers when Americans like you make the decisions on how to spend, save, and invest your money. So the tax relief we passed cut taxes for everyone who pays income taxes. We cut taxes on families by lowering rates and by doubling the child credit. We also reduced the marriage penalty, because our tax code should encourage marriage, not penalize it. We cut taxes on small businesses, allowing them to expand and hire more workers. And we worked with Congress to phase out the death tax, because government should not tax farmers or small business owners twice -- once when you make your money and a second time when you try to pass the fruits of your life's work on to your loved ones.

So far, the tax relief I signed has left $880 billion with America's workers and small business owners and families, and you have used that money to fuel an economic resurgence. Our economy has added jobs for 31 months in a row, creating more than 5.1 million new jobs for American workers. And the unemployment rate is now down to 4.7 percent, below the average rate for each of the past four decades. Real after-tax income per person has grown by more than 8 percent since I took office. And that means, on average, Americans have an income that is $2,100 higher this year than it was at the beginning of 2001, after adjusting for inflation.

Not everyone agrees that we should let you keep more of your money. Some in Washington said that by cutting taxes, we were "ruining" our economy. On the day that the House and Senate were finalizing the 2003 tax cuts, one Democratic leader said these cuts would "do nothing to create jobs." Since then, the facts have proven that critic wrong -- 5.1 million times over.

:spray:

Tax relief has done exactly what it was designed to do: It has created jobs and growth for the American people. Yet some here in Washington are now proposing that we raise taxes, either by repealing the tax cuts or letting them expire. These are the same politicians who told us that letting you keep more of your own money would be irresponsible, and reckless, and shameful. They were wrong then, and they are wrong now. To keep our economy creating jobs and opportunity, Congress needs to make the tax relief permanent.


:spray:

There's more to do to maintain America's economic strength. We're working to address rising energy prices and health care costs, which puts pressure on family budgets and the bottom lines of our small businesses. I have proposed practical reforms that would make health care more available and affordable, and I put forward an energy initiative that would make our dependence on Middle Eastern oil a thing of the past. I urge Congress to act on these important priorities, so we can keep America the economic leader of the world and allow more families and small businesses to realize the American Dream.

America's economy is strong and benefiting all Americans. By keeping taxes low and adopting sound policies that help our workers to compete and our businesses to grow and expand, we will keep the economy moving forward and extend prosperity and hope in our country.

Thank you for listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah Bush, you pathetic Cretin, tax cuts have been "great"
Edited on Sat Apr-15-06 10:25 AM by boobooday
For your base. The haves and have-mores.

Cheney can't wait for the direct deposit of his 1.8 million dollar refund, while people like me (an educator/student) are digging through the sofa cushions because we owe this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. We can't trumpet the 1.8 million dollar refund enough, IMHO.
I literally threw up a little when I read that last night.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:40 AM
Original message
And the corporate tax "refunds" as well
Keep talking about taxes, Bushie.

We should have "Dick Cheney got a 1.8 million dollar tax refund and all I got was this stupid dictatorship" T-shirts made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. I like that! I may borrow a version of it for my sig line! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. "...sound policies that help our workers to compete... "
Right--against each other for the precious few good jobs that are left.

I remember the mid to late 90s.

I remember good jobs being filled by people barely qualified to do them because they needed someone to produce.

I remember applications being available at front doors. I remember being interviewed once before I even filled out an application.

I also remember, what was it called, it's right there on the tip of my tongue, a, a, a, SURPLUS!

Yes, that's it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. About three years before the dot-com collapse...
...I received a call from a hiring manager at a major Silicon Valley company (VERY major...one of the biggest).

I'd placed my resume on the Web Site for one of the local, regularly-scheduled tech recruiting fairs held at the Santa Clara Convention Center. You were given the option of doing this so that you would be "pre-registered" for the event and could simply pick up your badge and program when you arrived.

He asked me "are you still looking for work?" I said yes. I thought it was someone from human resources.

Long story short...he was the hiring manager, the man I would ultimately work for (until we both got laid off in the dot-com bloodbath that followed).

It was VERY unusual for a hiring manager to take such a direct hand in rounding up applicants, but he said that he felt H.R. wasn't being aggressive enough and that there was too much competition for the best candidates, so he started surfing the job sites and making calls himself.

Fast-forward three years:

I went to the SAME recruiting event AFTER getting laid off from this company. Instead of HUNDREDS of companies exhibiting in the airline hanger-sized hall, it had been sectioned off to one small room, with maybe 30 companies, half of them temp agencies. EVERYONE working the booths had a FOUL expression on their faces. I approached one company that I used to work for as a temp and the guy in the booth was rude and almost confrontational when he didn't see the EXACT position he was recruiting for on my resume. SCREW skills and similar work experience...he wanted my resume to be a virtual carbon copy of his job description. When he didn't see that, he almost threw my resume back at me in contempt. Instead of job seekers squeezed shoulder-to-shoulder, standing room only as in previous years, there were only a few downtrodden, unenthusiastic folks who showed up. They'd seen the vitality of this recruiting fair dwindle down, down, down until it was nothing but a sad memory of better days and better opportunities in Silicon Valley.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bush is bragging about job creation???
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoftUnderbelly Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. few questions
does that $2,100 cover increases in healthcare and fuel prices over same period? (which i believe have increased above the rate of inflation?)

also, using the mean is pretty useless (i presume he used the mean) since that gets heavily skewed by the super rich. the median would be a more useful figure, i wonder what that is?

and thirdly: what kind of jobs are being created? its no good losing high skilled, high paying jobs with them to be replaced with non skilled minimum wage jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Excellent questions! Welcome to DU.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoftUnderbelly Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. cheers
always interesting to read whats going on in america. if i get answers to the questions, i suspect they wont paint quite such a rosy picture...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. yes, welcome, and one more question to add to yours...
Edited on Sat Apr-15-06 11:00 AM by spooky3
does that $2100 cover the higher housing costs (incl. property taxes)? Housing costs have definitely increased > inflation. While some get all excited about the increasing value of houses for their owners, it doesn't enrich anyone who's renting or who continues to live in the same community--they have to pay higher prices to live in the same place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Job creation in the '90s led to a major budget surplus.
More fully employed workers =ed a larger revenue flow.

Those "51 million jobs" don't seem to be affecting the 8 TRILLION dollar national debt.

Perhaps those 51 million jobs are in India?

I'm no economist, but even I can work this one out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brigid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. Nothing like . . .
Edited on Sat Apr-15-06 10:54 AM by Brigid
The smell of denial in the morning. I think I'll just go off and do this :banghead: for about half an hour now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bucknaked Donating Member (818 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sure Bush, tell that to the 2000 St. Paul Ford plant workers...
...and speaking of MN, tell the same spiel to 300 Best Buy employees that are being laid off (complete with grief counselors and taxi vouchers, for those to pissed-off to drive).

Yeah, great economy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
14. Shut up already, goddamned lying sack of shit
What an asshole retard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brigid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Your eloquence . . .
puts Shakespeare to shame. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. the US needed to add at least 5.4 mil new jobs v. the 5.1 mil shown
That is the lie Bush always tells. The US must gain a net gain of 150,000 jobs per month to keep up with new job entrants. So instead of a growing job market, we really have a job market that can barely add enough jobs to stay even with the new job seekers.

But he thinks he has created jobs with a tax cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JulieWisc Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. this line..
An important debate is taking place in Washington over whether to keep these tax cuts in place or to raise your taxes. For the sake of American workers and their families, and for our entrepreneurs, I believe Congress needs to make the tax relief permanent.

really means An important debate is taking place in the republican controlled Washington congress to raise your taxes. For the middle and lower class of American workers and their families who have seen there jobs go overseas or outsourced, and for our entrepreneurs and wealthy supporters, I believe Congress needs to make the tax relief permanent.

Agree anyone??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. You nailed it!
Welcome to DU! :toast:

Lots of great new DUers lately; this is WONDERFUL!

I'm happy to welcome you all, even if it's just to commiserate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. If you pour water into a leaky cistern
The level of the water will go down as long as you're pouring in less water than is leaking out. Similarly, "creating" 5.1 million jobs in six years doesn't keep up with the numbers of folks entering the job market over that time, so more workers are chasing fewer and fewer positions.

"Lookit! I poured 100 gallons of water into the tank!" Yeah, and 110 gallons leaked out while you were doing it. There is no gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Exactly, and they aren't necessarily good jobs either. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
21. I like this quote !
Edited on Sat Apr-15-06 04:08 PM by kentuck
"unemployment rate is now down to 4.7 percent, below the average rate for each of the past four decades."

What they don't say is that when they took office the unemployment rate was 4% - below the average of probably the last 10 decades? And that they are now about 20% higher than when they took office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-15-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. "5.1 million new jobs..."
... in India & China. :eyes:

How can you tell a republinazi is lying? -- Their lips are moving.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC