Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

smirk signs bill different from one Congress passed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:43 PM
Original message
smirk signs bill different from one Congress passed

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BUDGET_LAWSUIT?SITE=NYNYD&SECTION=POLITICS&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT


Consumer Group Challenges Deficit Law

A consumer-rights group on Tuesday challenged as unconstitutional the Deficit Reduction Act that cuts a wide variety of federal programs, on grounds the version President Bush signed differs from what was passed by the House.

The lawsuit by Public Citizen in U.S. District Court here is the second filed after Bush signed the $39 billion deficit-cutting legislation into law on Feb. 8. A Republican activist also has sued in federal court in Alabama.

"Under the Constitution, the same version of a bill has to be passed by both houses of Congress," said Adina Rosenbaum, an attorney at Public Citizen. "We filed our lawsuit because it's important for the government to abide by the law."

-snip-

At issue is a provision involving how long Medicare pays for renting some types of durable medical equipment. The Senate voted for 13 months, as intended by Senate and House negotiators, but a Senate clerk erroneously put down 36 months in sending the bill back to House for a final vote, and that's what the House approved Feb. 1.

By the time the bill was shipped to Bush, the number was back to 13 months as passed by the Senate.

House Democrats have accused GOP leaders of abusing the legislative process and asked for another vote. GOP leaders have declined. On the Feb. 1 vote, the bill passed by the slimmest of margins, 216-214.
-snip-
------------------------------------

the games they play hurt us all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, in essence, Congress is officially impotent
If the Prez can effectively pass whatever law he wishes, why bother with all that pesky bicameral nonsense?

That's not what I learned from "I'm Just a Bill/Yes I'm Only a Bill."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewWaveChick1981 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Maybe some Levitra would help.
:) Congress has been very limp for a long time now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. another article said WH was informed of this issue prior to signing but
Bushco went ahead anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well we know he doesn't read anything above "My Pet Goat"
I wonder how many laws he has signed are accurate and relect what the Senate and House passed?

Tip of the iceburg...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. I had a feeling they would just go ahead with the line-item veto
I wish, since Smirk now writes, enacts, executes, and interprets the law, they would lay off the Congress so that we wouldn't have to pay 535x$156,000 a year for their salaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Are they playing games in the White House, or...
are they just stupid and forgot what the job is?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. W.H. /Congress playing stuff your pockets with money games
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC