Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems gotta grow some berries if they want to take the house or senate.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
splat@14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 09:58 PM
Original message
Dems gotta grow some berries if they want to take the house or senate.
They can't do crap like cower from Feingold's stance and pull people like Hackett from any campaign. I know its old news but it pisses me off to watch this sort of shit happen.

SPLAT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Daylin Byak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. As for Hackett.....
As Alan Colmes said: "no one cares" and since Alan Colmes basically speaks for all Democrats, no one cares about the Hackett situtation in Ohio.

That was Sarcasm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think you have about 99% agreement here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. If so, I'm proud to be in that other 1%.
See my post below.

I agree Bush should be censured. I couldn't believe it when I heard that Feingold blindsided the whole caucus with this though. But so many reputable sources are reporting that now, I have to believe it. Even though it is un-frickin-believable.

If the Carpetbagger and Kevin Drum are right, Feingold just really effed up, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, I would say you are actually 100% correct -he effed up! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Suggest you read this
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/6864.html

Did Feingold REALLY blindside the whole Dem caucus?

If he did, did he REALLY expect them to follow him like children following the Pied Piper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brothaman2k Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. How could they be blindsided
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 10:36 PM by Brothaman2k
By an action they should have taken months and months ago?!

Torture of prisoners in a war which was essentially billed as "the right thing to do"... billions of dollars being spent to fight a war in a country that is starting to self destruct while victims of Katrina are still being screwed by insurance companies who don't want to ante up, all while the Attorney General of the US stands silent... violation of the constitution by taking a dump on the right to privacy... an official version of the attacks on 9/11 that make about as much sense as the "magic bullet" theory of the Kennedy assassination...

All that and democrats just stand silent nd let this country be stripped of all the concepts and precepts that make it America... It's patently pathetic and if Feingold caught them by surprise it's because the light of what should've been done long ago burned their eyes after spending so much time in the dark caused by burying their head in the sand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You have to choose your battles carefully when you don't have
the numbers or the upperhand. There are also right time and wrong times to strike. Feingold picked the wrong time. He isn't wrong about the legality of the wiretapping just about when he chose to strike. This was not a good move!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat@14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Disagree. Politically maybe some were blind sided but wrong is wrong.
The ethics of it stinks. It stinks when we found out about it and it stinks now. Feingold quite rightly said that it isn't political, its legal, and I agree. I don't think legality should be held up for politics.

The US won't bargain with terrorist, it shouldn't bargain with criminals either.....and I gotta go...gotta cut the rant short, etc!!! But appreciate all the comments!!

Cheers MH1! Give `em hell,
Splat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC