Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards speaks up on the outrageous oil and tax giveaways

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AmericanDream Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:44 AM
Original message
John Edwards speaks up on the outrageous oil and tax giveaways
Emphasis all mine

First the Vice-President's Energy Task Force. Then an energy bill basically written by oil and gas lobbyists. We didn't need more evidence that President Bush and Vice President Cheney are in the pocket of the oil and gas industry. But we got it anyway.

The New York Times broke the story that the Administration will allow big energy companies to pump about $65 billion worth of oil and natural gas from federal territories over the next five years without paying any royalties to the taxpayers. I should say that again: without paying any royalties whatsoever to the taxpayers. The Administration's own figures show that it will give up more than seven billion dollars in payments in the next five years. It's a pretty sweet deal. I am deeply concerned -- and I know you are, too -- that taxpayers are again getting ripped off and that wealthy corporations again are laughing all the way to the bank.

George W. Bush is the President of the United States, not the president of the oil and gas industry. But too many of his policies put the interests of that industry before the interests of the American people. We know he is an oilman; we know Cheney's an oilman, we know that many of their friends are oilmen, too. But this Administration goes too far when it takes care of those friends even when it hurts the American people.

Every day, I meet families who are struggling with high gas prices and soaring home-heating costs. Everyday, prices go up for the things we all need because the price of fuel goes up. Meanwhile, the big energy companies are hitting all-time record high profits. So why do they need another give away? They don't. And they certainly don't need another give away while oil prices climb to $70 per barrel.

This boondoggle is unfolding just as the Administration is pushing for its budget -- an immoral document if I ever saw one. Once again, their budget lavishes tax breaks on millionaires while it slashes programs that help the most vulnerable among us. If the President gets his way, 300,000 people will be pushed off food stamps; 19,000 fewer children will go to Head Start; and low- and moderate- income people will lose $36 billion in Medicare.

Everything people need to get ahead, let alone, get by -- is on the chopping block: student loans, vocational training, child care, Social Security benefits for widows, and more. My mind is reeling with all the people who could be helped with the seven billion dollars that Bush and Cheney are handing over to the oil and gas companies.

In the President's State of the Union address, he told us that America is addicted to oil. What he didn't admit was his role in bloating the pushers' profits.

We have the chance to get our country back on track. It's not too late to create a safe, healthy and hopeful future for our children. I am going around the country to help elect Democrats in 2006. I hope every one of you will get involved by working for candidates, organizing in your communities, and standing up for the people who have no one to speak for them.


Thank you for taking the time to read this message and for caring about our country every single day.

Your friend,

John


-----------

Why is the media not covering this story? Where is the outrage... these tax breaks are much huger than what was expected. The NYTimes article that Edwards alluded to covers the details:

U.S. Has Royalty Plan to Give Windfall to Oil Companies

The federal government is on the verge of one of the biggest giveaways of oil and gas in American history, worth an estimated $7 billion over five years.

New projections, buried in the Interior Department's just-published budget plan, anticipate that the government will let companies pump about $65 billion worth of oil and natural gas from federal territory over the next five years without paying any royalties to the government.

Based on the administration figures, the government will give up more than $7 billion in payments between now and 2011. The companies are expected to get the largess, known as royalty relief, even though the administration assumes that oil prices will remain above $50 a barrel throughout that period.

Administration officials say that the benefits are dictated by laws and regulations that date back to 1996, when energy prices were relatively low and Congress wanted to encourage more exploration and drilling in the high-cost, high-risk deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico.

Full story: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/14/business/14oil.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know if anyone remembers, but one of the first things Edwards
talked about when CSPAN was following him around at NH house parties was taxes and the way the tax burden is inequitably distributed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDream Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, he calls it valuing wealth over work....
He constantly talked about no bid contracts for companies like Halliburton, raising the capital gains tax, and other things. He actually gave a whole speech on Tax Reform at the New School University after the election...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Culture of corruption, croynism, and incompetence
George W. Bush is the President of the United States, not the president of the oil and gas industry. But too many of his policies put the interests of that industry before the interests of the American people. We know he is an oilman; we know Cheney's an oilman, we know that many of their friends are oilmen, too. But this Administration goes too far when it takes care of those friends even when it hurts the American people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. and Secrecy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kerry submitted a resolutution on Feb 14 - two days earlier
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 01:37 PM by karynnj
As Kerrygoddess posted:

"John Kerry to Introduce Resolution Today to Fix “Royalty Relief Program” for Oil Companies
February 14th, 2006 @ 7:57 am

John Kerry announced this morning that he will introduce a resolution in the Senate today that highlights the need to fix the royalty relief program for oil companies. The NY Times reported today that, “The federal government is on the verge of one of the biggest giveaways of oil and gas in American history, worth an estimated $7 billion over five years.”

It was made public today that the Bush administration will use the royalty relief program to allow oil companies to pump $65 billion worth of oil and natural gas from federal land over the next five years and waive any royalties to the government.

Below is a statement from Senator Kerry:

“It’s not America that’s addicted to oil, it’s the Bush Administration that’s addicted to oil. How else can you explain that buried in the President’s budget is one of the biggest giveaways of oil and gas in American history, worth an estimated $7 billion over five years? "

John Kerry to Introduce Resolution Today to Fix “Royalty Relief Program” for Oil Companies
February 14th, 2006 @ 7:57 am

John Kerry announced this morning that he will introduce a resolution in the Senate today that highlights the need to fix the royalty relief program for oil companies. The NY Times reported today that, “The federal government is on the verge of one of the biggest giveaways of oil and gas in American history, worth an estimated $7 billion over five years.”

It was made public today that the Bush administration will use the royalty relief program to allow oil companies to pump $65 billion worth of oil and natural gas from federal land over the next five years and waive any royalties to the government.

Below is a statement from Senator Kerry:

“It’s not America that’s addicted to oil, it’s the Bush Administration that’s addicted to oil. How else can you explain that buried in the President’s budget is one of the biggest giveaways of oil and gas in American history, worth an estimated $7 billion over five years?

MORE & LINKS - http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=1934

It's nice to see that they're in agreement that this give away is wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDream Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good for him, but once again he fails to tie it to the "people"....
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 05:28 PM by AmericanDream
Edwards talked about the things that are going to be affected by the budget, like funding for head start etc. Can Kerry take some classes on the art and effect of rhetoric from Edwards? :P

This has always been Kerry's problem: he is mostly on the right and reasonable side of the issues, but he doesn't know how to communicate that to the public in the most effective way.

Ah well... at least he's speaking about it unlike some others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He has been doing that before Edwards started to be interested in
politics.

This is a short text for the introduction of the Bill in the Senate, not a stump speech or something like that.

Some people will never stop amazing me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Didn't Edwards become interested in politics
only around 10 years ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDream Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. And is politics the only place that employs the art of rhetoric?
Edwards has been writing and delivering great closing statements for decades... this is not a diss for Kerry, it is just a reality. And, even his supporters should recognize this weakness in him. Why else did a man so capable lost to a guy who is a thousand IQ points below him? Kerry's linguistic skills are suited for the senate, they fail on the stump, unfortunately. Though I like listening to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDream Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Well he rarely distinguishes between the two nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'll take Kerry's rhetoric any day
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 06:11 PM by karynnj
Your comparing apples to oranges here - Kerry's is a statement dealing with a Senate action to attempt to change the budget. Kerry has many times spoken of the budget as showing what is valued and giving examples of the choices made. Edwards'is a statement sent to people. (If you want to see a great speech, try Kerry's speech before the Alito cloture vote, his Brown University speech, or his Rosa Parks memorial eulogy.)

Kerry's 1971 rhetoric caused an entire nation to stop and think about whether we should continue fighting a war. His rhetoric was so good that he was given about 5 minutes on every network. Edwards had a very good stump speech which he honed to perfection, but it won't be remembered 30 years from now. I was frankly disappointed with his convention speech - because he didn't live up to the high expectations.

Kerry obviously was able to reach more people with his rhetoric than Edwards in 2004. That one of the most articulate, eloquent men in the country was labeled as a poor communicator is a RW lie. I personally was far more impressed with Kerry than Edwards. (Obviously you would disagree)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDream Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. This isn't about you, you obviously are sold, it is about
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 02:52 AM by AmericanDream
the undecided and independents. And, No, Kerry didn't win people on his rhetoric... he won over people with his resume and his percieved electability. People who voted for him in the primaries didn't vote for him because he was a motivational speaker, but because of his experience in Vietnam and the senate. And, I think that is a good criterion for voting, but unfortunately, people need something more intimate to respond to in the general election... where you actually have to convinve people to pick sides rather than just convincing your own base about yourself, which he did very well in the primaries (and that load of money didn't hurt him either).

There is no need to get so defensive about it... I've heard all those Kerry speeches, I like 'em fine. I would, however, encourage you to check out this latest speech from Edwards:

http://real21mt.audiovideoweb.com/ramgen/avwebmt1257/edwards020806.rm

And, I urge you to... because you will see what I'm talking about. Edwards integrates real life examples with facts and theories; this is what the art of persuasion is all about.

And, yes I was disappointed with Edwards' convention speech too - in fact, the next day he himself said that "I wasn't read for it - it wasn't my best effort." One more reason to like him - he knows when he has gone wrong. Once again, check out the video above and tell me what you think.

I'm not saying that this makes Edwards better than Kerry, but just that he has a superior skill in this arena (even if you disagree).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC