|
saying we're doing great, the DOW is up, blah blah blah, and they look at their own finances and think it's just them.
It isn't just them. It's all of us.
Teens, who have not entered the job market, remain unemployed because adults have taken the teen jobs - working fast food, bagging at grocery stores, tearing tickets at the local ciniplex. The result? Official unemployment figures are adjusted downward.
Unemployed persons who have run through their unemployment have abandoned their mortgages and moved in with relatives, scraping by on temp jobs. Result? Official unemployment figures are adjusted downward.
Older workers are pressured into early retirement so that younger, less expensive workers can replace them - but those older workers can't really make it on the retirement they have so they take part-time jobs away from teenagers, keeping them from entering the job market, and we're back at unemployment figures. adjusted downward.
If the real unemployment was counted, it would be closer to 10% than 5%, and much of the job creation is in low-paying service jobs, not the higher wage manufacturing and technical fields that we are losing.
But in our insular lives, we see only us, and each wonders "where did I go wrong, that I can't make it in a booming economy?"
There's the news out the other day that 1/3 of the largest job markets showed 'negative growth' in wages -- but that's nowhere near the whole story. Wages are naturally higher in the largest job markets. So if there is negative wage growth in 1/3 of the largest job markets, what does it look like for the smaller, less flexible job markets? Those where a single factory or mill makes up half the local employment?
Whew. I'm tired. Rant over.
|