Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New national poll numbers: Kerry 45, Dean 14, Edwards 11, Clark 5

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:19 AM
Original message
New national poll numbers: Kerry 45, Dean 14, Edwards 11, Clark 5
Edited on Sat Jan-31-04 11:27 AM by Bleachers7
Those are newsweek national numbers. I will try to get them confirmed. I just saw them on MSRNC.

Kerry beats Bush again 48-46

Edwards second losing to Bush* 49-44

Bush's favorable is 49 which they say is a record low for Newsweek.

Kerry's favorability with Dems is 82. Overall it's 57. They said that's incredibly high. People feel he is very intellegent. Some feel he is out of touch. I am just regergitating what I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Baaaaaaa! the Sheeple say!
Its just ridiculous how the poll numbers change. The only possible conclusion is people never made up their minds in the first place! And Newsweek polls strike me as the least in line with other National polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. 15% jump
They said Kerry had a 15% jump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've heard it's neck and neck between Bush and ANY democratic......
nominee. :) Wish I had a link, sorry. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curse10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's the cutest pic Darth!
:-)

Sorry to derail the thread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. 82% wow
And 57% is a great number as well.

Gee, and all this time I was wondering if I was in the minority. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Considering that Edwards is the least known of the bunch
and that Dean is now (in my biased opinion) un-nominatable as well as unelectable, doesn't this show something?

Granted, Kerry is far ahead, but he was the ballyhooed front-runner in the beginning, and has had a remarkable comeback of late. Edwards is barely on peoples' radar at the moment, and he's steadily gaining.

Emotion aside, I beseech you to give him a serious look-see. (Must beat Junior, must beat Junior, must beat Junior...)

Edwards is potentially very popular in rural areas due to parts of his platform and his presentation, and he's got the most wide-ranging geographic appeal of any candidate. Throw into this the fact that he's got more positives and less negatives in a general election, and he warrants a consideration.

(He's also pretty damned progressive and has a very detailed platform.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. he's doing good in rural areas, not great, I think he'll pick up momentum
3rd in Oklahoma (within striking distance of first though) 1st in SC, 2nd (albeit a distant 2nd) in SC. but he is gaining ground
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. You left out one small but important thing about Edwards
He has the killer instinct of a grizzly bear. Just hard to tell with that boyish grin.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curse10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. Pretty interesting, but polls are not exactly gospel
Still keeping my reality hat on :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. Only about 30% say they share is view on issues. But they support Him
Pretty incredible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. National Polls are extremely unreliable right now.... Here's why
Edited on Sat Jan-31-04 11:47 AM by hlthe2b
The statistics used are predicated on the assumption that you can sample throughout the country and that there are no state-specific or regional specific differences. Thus relatively small sample sizes reach statistical significance only if one assumes that sampling from State A is no different than sampling from state B...

Given that different states are at different phases in the political cycle (primaries, caucuses) and differ in the attention being given to the candidates right now, this is not a viable nor justifiable assumption. The national press, of course, wants to assume that people make up their minds based on THEIR reporting and punditry, but increasingly we are seeing that that is simply not true.

A reliable national survey at this point would have to take this into account, thereby increasing the numbers required to survey dramatically. Given that this would be both costly and time consuming (and be required throughout the primary season), pollsters are not going to do this. But, they know (and would have to admit, if pressed) that the national scene is far to volatile to truly believe a sample of 1000 or so from a national poll is at all reflective of true national opinion... They justify the whole approach by saying they are looking for changes in trends. Those "trends," though, will likely be all over the map and doubtful validity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. There we have it.
The SHEEPLE EFFECT. 82%......Hahahahahaahahaha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
13. DLC breakin' out the champagne and 'Fear of Change' folks breathing
a sigh of relief. Whew...that was close. We almost had a revolution on our hands.

Dean '04...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC