Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards urges Senate to oppose Alito - Petition to Judiciary committe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AmericanDream Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:46 PM
Original message
John Edwards urges Senate to oppose Alito - Petition to Judiciary committe
Sign the petition below to urge Senate Democrats to stand together and use every means at their disposal to block the nomination of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. The results will be shared with Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Dear Friends,

When President Bush nominated Samuel Alito to replace Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court last year, I wrote you to express my strong opposition to his confirmation. His record, both on the bench and as an official in the Reagan and first Bush administrations, showed that he is an ideologue whose extreme views would put our fundamental rights at risk.

Now that his hearings in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee are underway, it is becoming even clearer that Samuel Alito is the wrong man for the job. It's time for Democrats to stand up for what we believe in. Join me in opposing Samuel Alito's confirmation to the Supreme Court.

http://www.oneamericacommittee.com/opposealito

Alito's careful dodging of the tough questions about his ideology and record can't hide the fact that his views are way outside the mainstream. His failed memory about his own activities -- from his membership in a reactionary group at Princeton to his failure to recuse himself from cases in which he had a financial interest -- creates a vacuum on ethical issues that is unacceptable in an appointment of this importance.

Please join me in calling on Democratic Senators to stand up for the core principals of our party by opposing Alito's nomination. This is not my petition; it is ours, because all of us are threatened by this nomination. Sign our petition calling on Senate Democrats to stand together and block Alito's confirmation with every means at their disposal. We will share the results with Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

http://www.oneamericacommittee.com/opposealito

What would it mean if Alito is confirmed to the Supreme Court? Alito is a conservative activist in the mold of Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. If he replaces the moderate Sandra Day O'Connor, a consistent swing vote, the court would shift far to the right, endangering our liberties so deeply that it would affect the lives of every single American.

Here are just a few of the positions Alito has staked out that put our fundamental rights in danger.

  • Abuse of Power. President Bush is now engaging in surveillance of United States citizens that violates federal law. He could have asked Congress to change the law, but he didn't. That overt abuse of power demonstrates the importance of a Supreme Court committed to protecting our basic freedoms. But Alito has consistently expressed support for vesting tremendous power in the hands of the President, with few checks by Congress and the courts. In questioning, he responded that the courts were ill-equipped to determine the limits for interrogations or detentions that the administration or the military deems important for security or to balance the government's needs against basic constitutional protections. The implication that he would take a hands off approach whenever the administration says "national security" is in invitation for governmental abuse.

  • Eliminating the Right To Choose. When Alito applied to work at the Justice Department in 1985, he expressed his strong belief that, in his own words, "the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion." As a judge, he took a narrow view of Roe that the Supreme Court, and Justice O'Connor, explicitly rejected. In his hearing, Democratic Senators repeatedly pressed Alito to distance himself from the view he expressed in 1985. He didn't. Instead he focused on the undisputed doctrine of stare decisis, that is, giving weight to existing case law. In the absence of a repudiation of his unequivocal statement in 1985, I am not comforted much. His answers about abortion sounded a lot like Clarence Thomas's. It's clear that given the opportunity, Alito will vote to restrict — and probably eliminate — a woman's right to choose.

  • Conservative Judicial Activism. Judge Alito has a history of putting his conservative ideology over the rule of law. He has voted to invalidate important laws passed by Congress, including a ban on machine guns and the Family and Medical Leave Act. And he has consistently ruled against victims of discrimination in the workplace. In all these cases, he has proven more conservative than many of his Republican colleagues on the courts of appeals and even more conservative than Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas in some cases.


Judge Alito has consistently sided with the most powerful interests, business or government, which concerns me greatly. But I am most concerned about his willingness to overlook executive abuse of power, which has been then hallmark of this administration. This is a judge who is way out of the mainstream, someone who disregards our fundamental rights and endangers our liberties. Join me today in urging Senate Democrats to stand together and use every means they have available to block this dangerous nomination.

http://www.oneamericacommittee.com/opposealito

Sign this important petition today. Your support will make an enormous difference to our Democratic Senators as they stand together to fight Samuel Alito's confirmation to the Supreme Court.

Thank you for all that you do for our party,

John Edwards

--------

On related topic: Walter Shapiro of Salon.com wrote:

The daylong circus of missed opportunities made me long for the days when John Edwards sat on the Judiciary Committee. Unique among congressional inquisitors, Edwards had actually faced a jury as a lawyer recently enough to still remember his courtroom tricks. During Bush's first term, I twice watched with awe as Edwards trapped Attorney General John Ashcroft in an embarrassing knot of contradictions over military tribunals and enemy combatants. But nothing like that happened Tuesday. Instead, the Democrats squandered the first round of questioning without coming up with a politically appealing rationale to justify a Senate filibuster against Alito, the only plausible strategy for stopping the nomination.

Full article: http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/01/11/alito_confirmation_hearings/index_np.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Shapiro is one of the few truly observant political writers.
He always looks below the surface to get a more accurate understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDream Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yup... and he is right on this one... the Dems' timidity makes me squirm.
Biden basically said on hardball "hey, he's going to be confirmed anyway" and I guess that is why he decided to spend his minutes performing a circus with a baseball cap. Arggggghhhh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Done. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's too bad he didn't keep his Senate seat.
Then he could lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Then he could have challenged both Roberts and Alito.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lady lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Done and recommended. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopein08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. kicked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Done, Recommended and
Forwarded to Friends !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Done. Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. done and done. -- John Edwards is a demigod. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks, Senator Edwards!
I don't always agree with you, but thank God someone knows where the lines MUST be drawn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samhsarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. good on him!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appal_jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. %@!$*&^%^!!! Edwards
Jeez Johnny boy,

Maybe if you'd DONE YOUR JOB as a Senator, instead of using your elected office the people of NC as a stepping stone on your failed quest to become president (and then VP consolation prize - also failed), you would be able to aid in the filibuster against Scalito. Instead, you're reduced to writing frigging petitions! Great. Just great. I am so inspired... :sarcasm: :banghead:

Meanwhile, the rest of NC and I are left with DOLE and BURR. I'll be calling them, and making my opinion about this SCOTUS appointment known, but your pathetic petition and polished hairstyle are not helping me, punk.

It sure would have been nice to have a Democratic Senator now. Too bad your high-falutin' aspirations were more important than your JOB on the PUBLIC PAYROLL and your OATH to the people of NC.

-app
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
16. SHUT IT DOWN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
17. done. Edwards in 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. please kick & recommend all filibuster threads
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDream Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Agreed. Dems are being fickle on this... we need to push them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC