|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Humor_In_Cuneiform (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 03:30 PM Original message |
We should be fair to * WH GOP re wiretaps on Americans, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DRoseDARs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. Bug the Oval Office... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 03:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Or how about using wasps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Humor_In_Cuneiform (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 03:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. That would work better than using W.A.S.P.'s, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 04:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Actually, that was my meaning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Humor_In_Cuneiform (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 04:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I knew that was what you meant! Guess I was spelling it out for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. "How are they going to continue to seize ... power..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Humor_In_Cuneiform (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 03:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. See? They need the wiretaps to "thwart" an attack, and/or to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 03:47 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. If a terror attack is "thwarted", how will anyone even know if there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Humor_In_Cuneiform (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 03:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. They'll trot out people to speak spontaneously on their first hand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 03:56 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. But, what about "national security"?.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 03:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. That was intended to be tongue-in-cheek... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Humor_In_Cuneiform (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-03-06 03:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. So they need the wiretaps to intercept anything that might cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC