|
Trippi had organization down but he did not have the party machine that Kerry was in a position to tap in terms of organization and knowledge of the ropes. Dean had a big outsider operation with lots of enthusiam but little experience.
In the weeks before Iowa, the media ramped up the attacks, including cover stories promoting doubt, negative press, a different damning story every night on the evening news(one was so vicious, I wrote ABC, furious that they would stoop to such ugly smears), all suggesting a lack of electibility, too angry. In fact, Dean's anger reflected his constituents, it was the Republicans who originally came up with the 'too angry' charge. About that time, Kerry met with many of the major media figures from the NYTimes, Newsweek, Time, CNN, Slate, WP, including Howard Fineman, author of one of the more damning articles. Just before Iowa, when Dean's numbers were falling due to the media onslaught, I saw one pundit publically accuse Fineman of responsibility in the destruction of Dean. Following Iowa, the media broadcast Dean's speech, as if he was some kind of crazed mad man and succeeded in whipping up people's fears and emotions. This was around-the clock onslaught, accompanied by scathing commentary and biased reports of voters, everyone of them portrayed as the casual observer, expressing negativity about Dean. This continued up to the NH primary and it wasn't until the day after, while Dean was struggling under the burden of this bombardment, and after Kerry won, that the media made small acknowledgement of their participation in the deception. The damage had been done, the fix was in, mission accomplished.
And what galls me, is that it was essentially a coup of sorts, and there is barely a peep about it, we all just turn away. And now, you expect me to reward Kerry with my vote? Since he couldn't win through his own merit, he called in a hit team. Chances are he will be getting a taste of his own medicine in the days ahead and I am not so sure that he doesn't deserve it.
|