Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry Among Top Recipients In Congress From Special Interests

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:09 PM
Original message
Kerry Among Top Recipients In Congress From Special Interests
Senator among top recipients in Congress from special interests

By Dana Wilkie and Joe Cantlupe
COPLEY NEWS SERVICE

January 30, 2004

WASHINGTON – In his quest for the White House, Sen. John Kerry says he is committed to sweeping out the "special interests" he contends are trying to manipulate federal laws and policies. But the Massachusetts lawmaker and Democratic presidential front-runner is among Congress' top recipients of money from some of those special interests – drug companies, HMOs, lawyers, investment firms, real estate interests and contractors, among others.

snip

This election cycle, Kerry took $531,251 from the health care industry, putting him among the top four recipients of such money – just behind President Bush and Democratic presidential contenders Howard Dean of Vermont and Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut.
Nearly $34,000 of that money came from HMOs or other health services companies, and an additional $55,650 came from pharmaceutical companies and firms that make other health products. He also has received funds from doctors and other health professionals.

Kerry also accepted $26,700 this election cycle from the oil and gas industry, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that tracks how campaign money affects elections and public policy. That makes him one of the Senate's top 20 recipients of such money. "I don't think anyone who has been in the Senate as long as Kerry has can really consider himself a maverick, or someone who is above the fray," said Keith Ashdown, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan group that examines political relationships with lobbyists.

snip

Kerry is among Congress' top three recipients of campaign donations from lawyers and lobbyists – having taken $3.3 million this election cycle. The only two people taking more money from this group were Bush and Democratic presidential contender John Edwards, the North Carolina senator and former trial lawyer.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20040130-9999_1n30kerry.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think I should just stay off this site
It's far too depressing lately. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. More On Kerry's Financial Ties To Special Interests
As a member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, Kerry is in a key position to influence laws that affect the airline and automotive industries.

This election cycle, the senator was among the top 10 recipients of money from such transportation interests – $87,925.

The construction industry, whose contractors and engineers make billions of dollars from federally funded transportation projects, gave the senator more than $306,000 this cycle, putting Kerry among the top three recipients of this sort of money.

He took $160,220 from general contractors, the companies that typically work in public transportation projects. Only Bush took more – $1.4 million.

Kerry was second to the president in the amount – $2.6 million – he took from the finance, insurance and real estate industries.

He was among the top three recipients – behind Bush and Dean – in the $883,950 he took from the communications and electronics industry.

Kerry was criticized for intervening in 1999 in a Coast Guard rule-making process that affected a foreign cable manufacturer – then taking $7,250 in campaign contributions from the lobbying firm that represented the cable company, according to The Hill newspaper.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. $7,250 in campaign contributions from the lobbying firm

But he has millions right? How would seven thou sway him to do anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. $7,250.00!!! WOW!!
That's like four people donating close to the max!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Like I've been saying, Kerry = Business As Usual
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. But he said he was gonna fight them!
Yeah, right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good - that's the way the game is played
Corporate interests shouldn't be allowed to fund politcal campaigns at all, but that's not the way it is. If Bush is going to have a huge pile of dirty money to spread his lies, we need an equally huge pile of dirty money to take him on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Newsflash: Dean hires Washington D.C. lobbyist to run his campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. no surprise - at least he's a conistent professional politician... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. No problem with that. No one will even mention it during the campaign.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't know who you support for the nomination
I just hope it isn't the same guy I support.

This kind of scorched earth politics between Democrats is just going to guarantee another 4 years of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. My heart is breaking
I don't think the Democratic Party has the ability to unite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. This report provides no names of the donors just general claims of origin
This is a broad swipe that tells us nothing about how John Kerry is supposed to have been influenced by these contributions. Anyhow, they rate him very high on disclosure. See for yourself and make your judgements.

Check your own candidate on their site also:
http://www.opensecrets.org/


From the posted article:

. . . some campaign finance reform advocates applaud Kerry, who has been in Congress 19 years, for refusing to accept contributions from political action committees, which can pool the resources of its members to give large campaign gifts.

"Part of what Kerry and other Democrats are saying is that they would represent other interests, presumably broader interests like working men and women, and environmentalists," said Thomas Mann, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank.


John Kerry Releases Fundraiser Names in Effort to Improve Transparency http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/pr_2003_1021b.html

John Kerry said, “Throughout my career I have fought for reform in the campaign finance system and I believe strongly that voters should know who is funding campaigns. There is no better reason for transparency than the Bush Administration’s blatant reward of campaign contributors with tax breaks and special favors at every turn.”

“I hope that every Presidential candidate will show their commitment to transparency by releasing the same information from their campaigns.”

Donor list:
http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/donors.pdf


01/06/2004
National Public Radio Democratic Presidential Candidates Debate Transcript
January 6, 2004 Tuesday
http://www.vote-smart.org/speech_detail.php?speech_id=M000026487&keyword=&phrase=campaign+finance&contain=

What's happened is the corporations across this country, whether it's Medicare, the energy bill--$50 billion of oil and gas subsidies for the energy companies at the expense of $18 billion added to the deficit. It's inexcusable. We're witnessing the greatest period of crony capitalism in the modern history of the country and we have to end it with campaign finance reform.

CONAN: But just let me follow up, Senator Kerry. Is there anything besides the money wrong with our political system? Redistricting, for example?

Sen. KERRY: Sure. Absolutely. There are a lot of things that are wrong besides that. But the biggest single reason why the voices of Americans, the average American, is not heard is because so much money flows into Washington. The lobbyists are parading through the halls of Congress. They actually wrote the Medicare bill. They were paid $139 million and they turned it into a $139 billion drug company benefit. It's one of the greatest modern examples of a feeding frenzy at the congressional trough that we've seen in any time that I've been there. And everyone in America understands what's wrong. George Bush is feeding that. We have to stop it.

And as president-you know, I've fought these interests all my life, Neal. I fought against Gingrich's efforts to cut the Clean Air and Clean Water Act. I led the fight to stop the drilling in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge. We have to stand up to these interests. I've done it, and I will.


Senator John Forbes Kerry (MA)
Title: Letter to Chair of the Federal Election Commission Ellen L. Weintraub
Date: 12/09/2003 December 9, 2003
http://www.vote-smart.org/speech_detail.php?speech_id=M000025731&keyword=&phrase=campaign+finance&contain=

The media exemption that the NRA seeks from the Federal Election Commission would allow them to purchase radio and television stations around the country. Then, instead of following campaign finance laws like the rest of America, the NRA would be able to take the millions it receives from the gun lobby and broadcast anything it wants for as long it wants-all under the heading of “news.”

As you know, the reason that current campaign finance laws bar interest groups, like the NRA, from airing television and radio ads about federal candidates in the period leading up to a primary or general election is so that big-money, special interests cannot flood the airwaves with propaganda and one-sided information. Campaign finance laws exempt legitimate news organizations from these rules for good reason - so that a diversity of views can be presented to the public free from censorship.

Like most of their right-wing extremist agenda, the NRA calling itself a news organization insults American's common sense and threatens the public interest. It's time we stood up to the NRA and put our public safety ahead of powerful interests. The NRA will be a “media” organization that scares Americans into thinking that Democrats want to take away all of their guns, but won't be interrupting their regularly scheduled programming with “breaking news” when a child is killed by an assault weapon that was purchased illegally and taken over state lines.

We urge you to prevent the NRA from hijacking America's airwaves with the gun lobby's money. If the NRA has something to say, it can play by the rules, just like the millions of people in America who do everyday. America does not deserve a media that is polluted by the special interests.


08/31/2003
NBC Meet the Press Transcript
August 31, 2003 Sunday
http://www.vote-smart.org/speech_detail.php?speech_id=M000018741&keyword=&phrase=campaign+finance&contain=

Paul Wellstone and I wrote the clean elections law for the country. The problem in America is there's too much money in the political system, and I have worked all my career to try to reduce the amount of money and influence in politics. I'm the only person now serving in the Senate with four terms who's run for election not with special-interest money, not with PAC money, not with soft money, not with independent expenditures. The only people who've elected me are individual Americans. And I think it's important to live by the campaign finance reform standard if we can. Now, if Howard Dean goes outside of that, I will reserve the right to do what I need to do because I don't believe in unilateral disarmament, but I think it would be better if every candidate lived by the standards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wait--I thought companies couldn't donate to people?
I mean...that's what people told me when Dean's #1 contributor was AOL/Time Warner.

I'm clearly missing something and am not trying to be facetious or cheeky. I'm in the middle of moving and am taking a break, maybe I don't have my thinking cap on.

What is the difference between Dean having corporations listed in his donor list and Kerry having corporations listed in his donor list?

I know I'm being dense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Dean campaign lumped ALL Kerry's individual donors by where they worked.
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 02:53 PM by blm
They want it to APPEAR as if Kerry took corporate pac moneywhen he did NOT.

They sent these figures to allthe news outkets.

Typical Dean deception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. if this is true, it's sad
all these guys really need to take a step back and look at what they are doing to each other and the dems as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. BEHIND HOWARD DEAN
Does everybody just ignore the others names in here?? This is just getting unreal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tryanhas Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. When will you people get it???
SKULL AND BONES OWNS THE FREAKING SPECIAL INTERESTS!

It's not rocket science!

John Kerry is a fluke! He is a member of Skull and Bones which owns the special interests.

He is nothing but a Skull and Bones alternative to Bush.

Choose one bonesman over the other?

Whatever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. .

:crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. And Behind EDWARDS from lawyers

"The only two people taking more money from this group were Bush and Democratic presidential contender John Edwards, the North Carolina senator and former trial lawyer. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. This is so misleading
Now hang on a minute. These numbers are by sector and can be verified at opensecrets.org. However the numbers are not broken down by company/individual. One of the largest industries (and highest paying) in MA is the biotech industry (which is considered healthcare). I personally work in "Computers/Internet" and have donated to Kerry (as well as Dean, Kucinich, and Clark). However, I donate outside of the scope of my industry. To say that all $500,000 from the healthcare industry is due to influence peddling is misleading and flat out incorrect. I'm sure some of it is, but to characterize any candidate as being in the pocket of corporate donors based upon these early numbers which only give a breakdown based on industry is absurd and intellectually dishonest. When one make a campaign contribution you are required to name the company you work for and your contribution goes towards that total. By the argument here Kucinich and Dean are in the pocket of the communications industry and "Misc business", Edwards is in the pocket of "lawyers and lobbyists" (big time..nearly 70% of his donors work in these industries), and clark is being controlled by lawyers, lobbyists, the communications industry, and "Misc business"

While these numbers are useful they do not paint a nearly complete picture. When you can find out the individual donors and their positions within a company and particularly is a single company appears to have 30 or 40 employees all donating than you have a much better idea of who is greasing who
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. And IDIOTIC Repub AGGREGATION of Individual donors into INDUSTRIES

It is a classic republican tactic to compare total aggregated
small donations by individuals who happen to work in various
industries WITH the 1 Mill plus donations that used to be give to
the RNC is soft money.

It is a disgrace that Dems are using this tactic here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
22. So Kerry plants articles in the press but Dean doesn't, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. Can We Just All Actually Read Bigtree's Post 10 and Stop Oversimplifying?
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 03:35 PM by emulatorloo
Bigtree's sources do some analysis, rather than just listing names of corporations off of the reports without any analysis. If I read these reports I see Citibank at the top of WC's list and Time Warner and MS at the top of HD's. Somehow I cannot get in a knot about that unless I have had some kind of analysis of this rather than a plain recitation.

I do support JK as my first choice.

I do support DK WC HD JE and all the rest.

I am tired of binary thinking, oversimplification, and knee jerk reactions about all of candidates. But that's just me I guess.

The only place for binary thinking for me is Dem/That Represhensible GWB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. Dean accepted speaking fees, gifts while governor
WASHINGTON - While governor of Vermont, Howard Dean accepted personal pay from special interests at least five times for speeches, according to documents and interviews.

He also received more than $60,000 in checks and pledges for his charity fund from insurers who benefited from a state tax break.

Dean's fees and charitable donations were legal and did not have to be disclosed under Vermont law but were detailed in correspondence and tax records reviewed by The Associated Press.

The lion's share of Dean's $13,633 in personal speaking fees as governor came from a drug company that was embroiled in one of the nation's most high-profile sexual harassment cases, which ultimately ended with a nearly $10 million federal penalty.

<snip>
The charitable checks and pledges were delivered to Dean and his aides in the mid-1990s by a lobbyist for the insurers. In one letter on his official stationary, Dean wrote lobbyist John L. Primmer to tell him about the status of a state tax break for the industry and to simultaneously thank him for a personal gift.
http://rutlandherald.com/hdean/77111
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
m-jean03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. Aren't these donors taking a gamble?
Just because they donate to a politician doesn't mean that politician will necessarily be their best friend, does it? "Thank you for the support -- Now excuse me..." You need money to be a serious contender, and wouldn't it be difficult to turn down this cash if it is offered? Take advantage of it. Could a man with so much wealth as Kerry have his votes bought with a few thousand $$s?

Back when Gore and Bush were being called identical twins by Nader I did a term paper on corporate influence in politics and OF course, they both accepted A LOT of money from the same major Big Bads (egad, ANGEL and BUFFY creeping into my vocabulary:o !).

But Gore and Kerry are both a lot more concerned with environmental protections, neither are tied to PNAC and neither are delegates of the Christian Coalition!! Neither are cozy with big oil! Thank you, very much. Neither of them would hire a Rumsfeld a Rove or a Bremer or have a former Halliburton exec as their running mate. Neither of them would alienate & encourage hate crimes against my gay and lesbian friends.

Kerry could be corrupt, but I'm betting on just wishy washy and somewhat opportunistic. Hence the four words that speak for me: lesser of two evils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC