Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gephardt the best choice for Kerry VP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ringmastery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:05 PM
Original message
Gephardt the best choice for Kerry VP
Gore lost Missouri by 3 points. Gephardt brings Missouri home to the democrats with Kerry. And you know what? Missouri is all we need. If we hold all the Gore states (and Gephardt will probably help in Iowa and Minnoesota, and Wisconsin too), we win. We don't need to win a single southern state. We don't need Ohio, or West Virginia, or Arizona, or Florida.

We hold the Gore states and add Missouri and we win. Slim margin for error, but doable, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gephardt flopped as a candidate
I doubt that he would even carry Missouri against Bush. We need a senator like Graham or Bayh (maybe Gen Clark) for our veep slot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbmykel Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh please no!
It might make sense if you assume Gephardt could deliver Missouri. I don't know that that's a slamdunk.

Really, Kerry does not need another face that's been around too long. I hope he considers other, more dynamic options. Of course, Edwards would be an obvious choice, but it's still not clear what states he could deliver.

It will be interesting to see who he comes up with should he end up as the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adjoran Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe
Gephardt is popular in the urban areas of St. Louis and Kansas City, less so elsewhere. If he could guarantee the state, of course it would be a big boost to the ticket.

I still think the best choice is Bill Richardson. He would appeal to the fastest-growing group in the country, Hispanics, and could therefore help in several states. He would lock up NM (won by only 500 votes in 2000) and CA, and give us a fighting chance in Florida and Colorado, and perhaps elsewhere, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, THAT's the sort of dynamic ticket that will beat Bush!
not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, please Jesus, No...
No...

No...

No...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Consider voter turnout:
you need a percieved "outsider"
and/or a southerner

Gephardt is neither.

Clark, Dean, Graham, Edwards & Kucinich (we DO need Ohio) would all make a better Kerry ticket than Gep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, the perfect choice....
...for a Bush Jr landlside in 49 states :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wildmanj Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gephardt
I will have one hell of a time supporting Kerry with Gephardt on the ticket, I will definitely go searching for some other party to put my X by. Never again will I cast straight Democratic votes as I have done since 1984.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metrix Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm taking a second look at Gephardt as VP
Early on I thought Gephardt would be the best choice. Then thought Edwards. Though I like him I think he is selling image too much. I like Wes Clark but would like to see him in another capacity in the Kerry administration.

Kerry has said, and I believe him, that he would choose someone fully ready to take over as President. Back to Gephardt and trying to figure out what he would bring to the ticket versus the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Gephardt is a proven loser. I don't want him anywhere NEAR the Kerry campaign.

He just reeks of foulness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
isbister Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Would they be able to overcome Iraq War issue?
Since they held such different positions in many regards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Gepardt would be a good VP choice for Edwards
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 02:42 PM by dolstein
But it doesn't make much sense for Kerry. Kerry has spend the past 20 years in Washington. Do we really want a ticket comprised entirely of Washington insiders?

Also, there's no way that adding Gephardt to the ticket would help Kerry carry Missouri. For one thing, Gepardt is just a representative. He's never been elected statewide, so the vast majority of voteres in Missouri would never have voted for him before. And the fact is, the best a VP choice could do is push the ticket over the top. But Kerry wouldn't be competitive in Missouri in his own right, so adding Gephardt won't make a different. Just see the example of 1988, where Dukakis failed to carry Texas despite selecting Bensten, the most popular Democrat in Texas, as his running mate.

Edwards, on the other hand, could benefit from having an "old hand" as his running mate. And since Edwards would already be competitive in Missouri, picking Gephardt could add a small boost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chyjo Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. I like Gephardt fine for VP
but Kerry/Edwards is my dream ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kerry needs either someone who opposed the war (such as Dennis)
or someone from the South (such as Edwards).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. No, he needs Clark and
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 04:10 PM by Anti Bush
more Southern votes and confidence in national security. Kerry has experience and doesn't need Gephardt and he can use Clark's international experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StlMo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yes. Gephardt on the ticket would ensure victory.

Dick Gephardt has spent his life fighting for progressive Democratic values and the patently false allegations of "milquetoast-ness" and "selling out to Bush" should not and will not dissuade a majority of Americans from supporting Gephardt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StlMo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. For the record, Gephardt has been a powerful leader against NeoCon\Bushies

Gephardt has a long, patriotic history of fighting the NeoCons.

Gephardt led the fight against the critically flawed NAFTA.
NeoConservatives delighted in the lack of worker rights and the absence of environmental protections. Even though many Democrats (including Dean) caved to the right wing agenda, Gephardt stood firmly opposed to the so-called "free trade" attack on America.

Gephardt led the fight against permanent normalized trade with China.
America could have bargained for safe labor conditions and protection against conservation catastrophes, but instead centrists and NeoConservatives used the opportunity to strike a blow against jobs and lives. Dick Gephardt valiantly opposed their plot, but the right wing interlopers prevailed. If only more Congressmen had lived up to Gephardt's example - the world would be a much better place.

Gephardt led the fight that banned discrimination because of gender, race, ethnicity, orientation, age, and religion. Amazingly, NeoConservatives want to drag America back to Medieval social restrictions. Gephardt led the campaign that kept sexual orientation from being an exception in America's effort against discrimination. Gephardt and his allies ended the ban on gay and lesbian Americans serving in the armed forces. NeoCons knew that Americans were becoming more tolerant of different sexual orientations so the NeoCons attempted to institutionalize hate in the form of legalized discrimination. Yet, the NeoCons failed and will continue fail to impose their bigotry on America - because of the brave opposition of leaders like Dick Gephardt.

Gephardt led the fight against the NeoConservative plan to rape Alaska for a miniscule amount of oil. Thanks to leaders like Gephardt, progressives saved that unique piece of America.

Gephardt led the opposition that kept Bush from putting large doses of the poison arsenic into drinking water.

Gephardt led the successful protection of the Department of Education by NeoConservatives that fear an educated populace. Gephardt struck a further blow with the expansion of access to federal student loans to all students instead of a select few - allowing more Americans to build a better life.

Gephardt leads the fight to solve America's horrific HealthCare crisis. It is a high priority for NeoConservatives to protect the gluttony of gigantic pharmacological corporations. NeoCons bribed just enough members of Congress to block Universal HealthCare in the past. A Gephardt Administration would realize what NeoConservatives dread - all Americans receiving medical attention.

Gephardt leads the fight to save Social Security while NeoConservatives attempt to destroy it by transferring its funds to the Robber Barons that lead the NeoCons.

Gephardt leads the fight to save Medicare while NeoConservatives try to wipeout Medicare and all other programs that help the American people (because their masters want the money - and NeoCons just hate people who aren't rich).

Gephardt leads the fight to discover the truth about September 11. The NeoCons are scrambling to hide Bush's failure to take any measures against a terrorist attack that Bush knew was coming. Gephardt had the guts to ask what Bush knew and when he knew it. The truth was blocked in the Senate, but not in the House of Representatives - thanks to Gephardt.

Gephardt leads the fight to establish an International Minimum Wage - a living wage for all people everywhere. Gephardt leads the fight to abolish sweatshops and child labor. It is hard to imagine a concept that strikes more fear into the dark hearts of NeoConservatives than the global agenda of Dick Gephardt.

Contrary to popular opinion, Dick Gephardt did not give Bush what Bush wanted in Iraq. When one goes past the right wing mainstream Media spin, one discovers that Bush entered office (thanks to five idiotic and immoral Supreme Court judges) with the authority to invade Iraq - and to order the U.S. military to remove Saddam Hussein. The constitution also specifies that the authority to conduct more than limited action in Iraq or elsewhere requires an official war declaration. The alleged war resolution signed by George Bush jr. had only symbolic conditional approval for Iraq and the conditions where things NeoCons despise - International support and a requirement for a real threat. It also blocked NeoCon plans to invade Syria, Iran, Lebanon, etc. Gephardt forced Bush to sign a document that Bush did not want.

Dick Gephardt is a progress populist and the NeoCons correctly fear that Gephardt will lead the people against the evil NeoCon agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. oh just kill me now
put me out of my misery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. not!
bad enough that we have to endure Kerry, add another boring uninspiring person on the ticket, and we might as well just give Bu$h $200 for passing GO!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. The bland leading the bland n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. This thread is a dupe
And so is my reply: Kerry/Gephardt = major leak of Dem votes to someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. that would antagonize the Dean supporters too much
I think Gep would be the perfect V.P., but if Kerry gets the nomination he's going to reach out to Dean supporters, picking someone Dean-friendly, or even Dean himself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. The ONLY thing that Dean could do to cause me to lose all respect
for him would be to veep for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mndemocrat_29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. No
Nothing against either candidate (like them both), but I think we should have at least one relative newcomer to politics (someone like Edwards, Landrieu, Bayh, or Lincoln) on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC