Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who will get to tell Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dennis00 Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 12:56 AM
Original message
Who will get to tell Bush
it's in his best interest to resign?
Condi Rice?
Karen Hughes?
Karl Rove?
Poppy Bush?
His twins?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. None of the above, because
not one person you listed has read the Constitution or gives a shite about it.

After all, "it's just a piece of paper".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. cheney


Cheney to Bush: I believe it is in YOUR best interest that you resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Doctor Death and Destruction Himself
Great pic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. A pic of one mean SOB
You would think he was a greedy corporatist oil exec. Nothing Christian in his looks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. FAT CHANCE.
All those shitheads think the Constitution is just a "goddamned piece of paper", as Dubya so affectionately calls it.

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7841.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis00 Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hughes and Rove
IMHO if the drums of impeachment get loud enough,
if there is a consensual feeling that he is sinking the republican boat befor 2006 elections,
he will be told he is resigning. He won't be asked to resign. The threat of impeachment hearings exposing to many repug secrets and bringing down to many people will do it.
It will be Hughes and Rove and maybe Rice, the only people he trusts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'll volunteer
:hi:

I could even deliver the news without totally exploding in rage for everything the fucking bastard's done for the last 5 years. Just to be able to watch that moment. And see him explode in rage for getting caught and knowing even the Republicans want him gone. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. Just reading That list makes me ill
Knowing that such worthless (that's too kind) individuals to have actually held positions of power in this country simultaneously gives me hope and leaves me outraged.

It's a hopeful sign for village idiots, skid-row bums, pickpockets, snake oil salesmen, pimps/madames and murderers. Because if the Bush cadre can hold the top offices/appointments in the land, then it means anyone--even those of the indicated questionable occupations/intelligence/offenses must be considered qualified to hold top office as well on the basis of similar character/ability/skills. In other words, if Bush fils can be President, and therefore be considered qualified for the same, so too must a drunken village idiot be considered qualified.

As for the outrage part... it's probably rather obvious, yet in addition to having many causes, I particularly hate what it says about us. Many Americans supported and some even continue to support these people and participated in electing these people, by hook or by crook. They are so completely and utterly base and undeserving of such career success that even the fact that they were considered for their positions--positions of prestige and importance, nationally and internationally, in the government of the United States of America--is an abomination and cause for great shame. That we've been unable to avoid having these people come to power and that we've since been unable to either unseat or remove them shows both how ignorant and how powerless the main factions of American political thought, are (I'll leave it to you to decide which group is willfully ignorant and which is basically powerless thus far). This is bad for many reasons as well, but in particular, it means that it's being allowed for one group to be misled and blinded to the truth by their leadership class (the media being the means to the end), and the other group is being successfully divided and excluded from even participating in the national political system (it's congressment have been forced to go sit in the corner and not allowed to participate). These are states of affairs that shouldn't ever exist in this or any other Democratic Constitutional Republic (the problem resembles "pure" Democracy, otherwise known as absolute majority "Rule").

Our Republic (which everyone has been "trained" to call "Democracy") is currently broken--and if not fixed very soon ('06, or '08 at the latest), it may never recover. Too few seem to realize just how desperately serious the problem is; never being one to overreact is usually the wise choice, but it can lead to becoming conditioned to never respond with urgency (or to fail to recognize when to respond with urgency)--even when urgent, aggressive, dramatic response is required, and the right and necessary choice. I fear that one day we'll wake up and realize that while we all 'felt' terribly concerned, we simply idn't realize how desperate the situation was and failed to react adequately. We all 'saw' it and concluded it was very bad; we all 'considered' it to be very serious; we all 'imagined' that somehow we would fix it; alas, we all "we're wrong". Make no mistake, "This is War!". The Republicans recognize this (hey, they're the ones who've declared it), and act accordingly. In fact, the Reapers treat this as "Total War" (just like World War II wherein even civilians became full and fair game). The response isn't some warm fuzzy slogan like "we'll get them", and it's going to involve alot more than just making a donation or blogging/preaching to the choir.

Ever think "Yes, it's urgent, but I don't know what to do about it and surely the party leadership has a plan and is working on the problem...". Ever think "We'll all get organized next year...". I admit, I have. However, if I admit the truth, I don't actually have proof that our leadership has a plan or is actually working it. I don't know what the plan is. I "hope" we'll get "organized", and definitely by "next year", since in six days, it will be the start of next year... but I don't have any reason to believe that we actually will come together and organize our activities in anything resembling a great enough degree. We need leadership to achieve this, and we all need to recognize that the degree of organization and committment required is going to be greater than most of us have ever before known. We'll all be much happier and less stressed when we do become involved in a pervasive, nation-wide movement (if only for the sense that we're really "doing" something--and have some actual say regarding our destiny).

Anyway, the short answer to you're question of "who will tell Bush..." is: "We should!"

A little (very little-since this topic deserves at least a 50 page report) on what we need to do--once organized anyway...

One key priority once we have both leadership and an inspiring mission statement (in support of an actual "plan"), is to get the millions of people who simply have no involvment in politics to understand how important it is, how "desperately" important it really is. Oh, and I feel it's necessary to mention the obvious: tactically, the most important thing we must do is to obtain control of, or create a new, broadcast network for the "truth" (which, if not synonymous with "liberal view", at least it supports it). Many other items need addressing, some obvious, some not--I'll leave that for another time. Feel free to contribute your own thoughts on what should be done, or otherwise enlighten me as fitting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. Jesus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. he is more valuable as a martyr.. than a liability, it will be a staged
assignation by the NeoCons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. That is not outside the realm of possibility
He'll soon lack the credibility to be a martyr,however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC