Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do we really want Hillary as President because of Hillary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MindLikeAParachute Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:24 AM
Original message
Poll question: Do we really want Hillary as President because of Hillary
Or are secretly wishing we'll get Bill back?

I know they make a team, and would be great, but Hillary has a mind of her own, and I bet it differs with Bill on many subjects. That said, I'll take her over * any day (I'd take a toad over * any day), but honestly, do we want Hillary because of Hillary, or do we want Hillary because of Bill? Because it'll affect how this whole thing is driven and promoted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was at Barnes and Noble
the other day and was just stupefied over a book in the Current Affairs section - "Condi vs Hillary" ...couldn't bring myself to even touch it...:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harpo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. hillary voted YES on Iraq and stands by it...I vote NO on her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. That's my reasoning too. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. running her would be a BIG MISTAKE
IMO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here's ONE reason we don't want Hillary ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. Kucinich and Clark have supported flag burning bans too
Hillary is my last choice for 08 for a multitude of reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Yeah, but Denny and Wes don't run to go cozying up
to right-wing issues every two seconds. One mistake is an anomaly on both Kucinich and Clark's parts. With Hillary, it's a way of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. I voted "no Hillary" but I'll tell you this . . .
I WILL vote for whoever promises to fix the incredibly stupid and expensive way we dispense health care in this country, because that's what's going to bankrupt the average Joe and Jane more certainly than tax cuts for the rich, foreign wars we can't pay for, or a million other corporate entitlement programs.

And Hill (and Bill) made a pretty good start on a fix in '92, just didn't have the political savvy to get it done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Wasn't political savvy
They came up against the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" (Scaife, Coors, etc.) plus the vast "Health Care Conspiracy" (Karen Ignagni and her "Harry and Louise" infomercials; Mr. Bill Frist, the Drug Cartel, the Insurance cartel, the for profit Hospital Chains like Mister Frist's HCA and the and the megabucks that both elected the Gingrich "Contract n America" team and defeated Hillary's strongest ally, Pennsylvania's Harris Wofford and gave us Rick Santorum).

The same technique as the Swift Boating of Kerry. And, like the Swift Boating of Kerry - it worked.

So we have Santorum instead of Wofford, and we have Mister Frist.

(My Mom is a retired OR Nurse and Nursing School Prof - and you should hear her on Mister Frist -- burn your ears off -- and she has never met him)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Like I said: "political savvy"
These guys have to be defeated somehow, and politics is the only path I see. Also in the savvy department, I don't think Clinton & Clinton realized how powerful and organized the resistance would be, or how broad-based the application of dirty tricks would be.

This was, IMO, the crystalization of the WRWC into an obvious, public menace, which had previously been behind the curtain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. I voted 'No' but...
it would be funny to see the freepers heads explode when they got images of Bill wandering around the WH. Now THAT would be priceless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wishing we could give '08; PRing one's favorite; or flamebaiting a rest.
n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. While Democracy is being destroyed, Hillary makes news by supporting
a ban on flag burning. I will not support any candidate that can keep quiet during these horrendous assaults on the Constitution and our freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bill was a nightmare. For the US, for the planet.
His continued sanctions on Iraq cost tens of thousands of lives (his Sec of State proudly said it was all worth it) With Hillary's urging, he signed the anti-poor people's bill ("welfare reform").
He did endorse a raise in the minimum wage, but only when the Repubs took over Congress, to put them on the spot (yes, they passed it) It sure as hell was not a living wage, which they opposed.
Yes, he was better than W. Yes, both W and Bill are better than Mussolini. These are not my standards, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. At least Bill wouldn't have given us this Professor in the DOJ
Edited on Fri Dec-23-05 10:56 AM by Coastie for Truth
, link to original article , and he is even on the UC Berkeley Boalt Hall Law School and . No, I'll take Janet Reno and Robert Reich over the like of Judge Starr and Senatior Ashcroft and Alberto Gonzales, thank you.

And Hillary will not give us a Sam Alito or John Roberts or harriet Miers. I think Steve Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsberg are just a little bit more to my liking then Alito.

And Bill Clinton never said "I will appoint Justices like Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia".

I am not picking on Boalt Hall - here's a winner from
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. We must demand better than the Clinton's. We owe it to the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. I'll buy beer for the House at Moran's in Oakland
when Mister Frist nominates Boalt Hall Professor John C. Yoo to SCOTUS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDream Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. My sentiments exactlly.If Bill's our standard of "good", it isn't too high
I can't point to one reform put into place by his administration that moved America forward and ahead in a progressive way. He was a conservative in the literal sense... he only aimed to conserve the union that was handed over to them, he never aimed to reform it for the better. The Clinton Presidency lacked a vision, something we need desperately need to put this country back on track. He was competent (which is a great virtue, esp. in the light of the current administration), but without a clear vision or ideals. I think we can do way better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. He was fighting
Chicken Hawk Dr. Newton Leroy Gingrich, PhD, and Chicken Hawk, Dr. Dick Armey, PhD, and Chicken Hawk Dr. Phil Graham, PhD, and all of the book bag tottin', pointy headed, right wing pseudo-intellectuals, with an out-pouring of Scaife, Coors, Norquist etc. money (the same money that is on Bush's side).

What may be the alternative in 08? Jebbie Bush? Mister Bill Frist? Maybe they can get John C. Yoo a Supreme Court seat.

We went through this stuff in 1968 against Hubert Humphrey - and got Trickie Dickie.

We went through the (Republican dirty tricks funded) Nader campaign in 2000 with its mantra of "TweedleDum and TweedleDee - both the same -don't make no difference" - Right? Didn't make No Difference?

What is this Death Wish of Progressives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDream Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. the alternative in 08 would be...
the men and women who are going to run for the democratic nomination. I wasn't saying that I would vote for a republican over the clintons; my point was that Clinton is no standard for greatness and my vote would be a half-hearted one. But be assured that if hillary gets the nomination, she'll have my vote in the general (I took that point as a given). We have to choose the better alternative in the dem primaries... that was my point and I think there are a lot of better democrats who have the potential to be motivating leaders, and hillary isn't one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. I agree with you - I will vote for the Dem nominee
Side note: altho I disagree with some of his policies - I think Harry Reid is a tough, feisty, hard nosed, hrd rock miner, prize fighter. He is not an Ivy League "nice guy" like Kerry. I like that - for a change.

As a (some time/former) academic myself - I think we run too many academic types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. Clinton started caving into the right wingers in 1992 while he
Edited on Mon Dec-26-05 11:42 AM by Lydia Leftcoast
still had a Democratic majority in the House. He never proposed anything progressive that he didn't back down on when the right-wingers objected. He had no core principles other than wanting to be liked by everyone.

I believe that the Republicanite takeover of the House in 1994 was due to a public perception that the Democrats "weren't doing anything." If Clinton had stood firm on national health care and made a public appeal a la Reagan (instead of trying to placate the insurance companies) and told the right wing military brass that anyone who publicly objected to his allowing gays in the military was guilty of insubordination, the public would have reacted favorably. I've noticed that an awful lot of people like gutsy politicians and don't particularly care what they're gutsy about. That has been part of Bush's appeal--he doesn't back down but brazens it out, no matter how badly things are going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. "I think we can do way better." -- That is
what got us into trouble in 2000. And look what we got! Whatever one may feel about BC. At least with the American people he was HONEST. We are fed lies every day with the current regime. Clinton was not perfect, no president will ever be, but he sure was a hell of a lot better than what we have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDream Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. what's the point?
Of course he is better than Bush, I wasn't refuting that.... but a lot of the people who are running in '08, imo, have the potential to be way better leaders than Bill Clinton. And no, clinton was NOT honest... but fortunately, the things that he did lie about were irrelevant to the lives of the American people unlike the current administration's lies.

Btw, your 2000 commentary is off-base... I don't think anyone here would advocate voting for a republican just because "we can do way better." That "better" is/was/has to be a part of the democratic party... I don't see anyone on the republican side who will be better than clinton but I do see many in our own party who have that "vision thing".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's Hillary by a landslide!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
19. "we?"
Some of the "we" don't now, and have never "wanted" Hillary, at least not if the "whole thing" you are referring to is a presidential candidate.

With respect to both, and no ill will intended, I'm not interested in either of the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katejones Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I certainly don't want Hillary
and I think she would just inflame all the right wingers and make them come out in droves, do we want that??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Amen!
Edited on Fri Dec-23-05 11:58 AM by Jai4WKC08
Hillary Clinton is the least electable of anyone discussed as a potential '08 nominee. The idea that women would vote for her because she's a woman is nonsense. And for all that most Democratic voters remember the Big Dawg fondly, that won't be enough to get them to vote for his wife. Especially if we're still at war, and there's no reason to think we won't be. Oh, a few might... for either reason or both... but no where near as many as would vote against her for the same reasons.

The GOP could run a pig and the right wing and a helluva lot of those in the middle would flock to the polls and open their wallets wide to defeat her. She's hated that much.

There are a lot more important things than picking who's most electable, but do we have to go with the one who couldn't beat the worst possible Republicans out there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McLuhan Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I don't want HRC;
however, I would vote for her over any Repuke. Go Wes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Yep. Hillary would SCARE voters to the polls to vote against her.
Right or wrong, that's what would happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abbiehoff Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. I don't understand why the press seems to think that Hillary
is the likely Dem candidate for 2008. I think she's pretty much at the bottom of most people's list. If she does become the candidate, it will be because the voting machine companies think she will be the easiest to beat and make sure she wins the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. Who's this "we" you speak of?
Certainly not ME.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
31. The name "Clinton" is the only democratic name many Americans
know! Pathetic as that sounds, they don't KNOW of any other democrats considering a run. It's that simple.
They may know that Kerry lost last time. That's about the extant of their interest. "Hillary" they've all heard of before.
I would vote for almost any other dem before her. She is the most hated woman in the country since Madeleine Murray O'Hare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
33. I want BILL! But I think Hillary wants to be a Senator, and I feel sort
Edited on Fri Dec-23-05 09:58 PM by McCamy Taylor
of sorry for her if she has to run for president, just because her husband wants to be president again for eight more years. She is obviously having a good time having her own career, and it seems like a shame for her to have to become an extension of Bill again. Cant he run for UN Head or something?

I sort of wish W. had gotten the ammendment saying how many times a pres could run changed BEFORE his approval went into the toilet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
34. Hi MindLikeAParachute!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
36. Choice #5: I DON'T WANT A GOD DAMN REPUBLICAN
That's my vote! Oh and that's a republican who is registered republican and has the "R" next to their name. Not this bullshit "Oh I don't like that democrat because they didn't vote for the one issue I care about the most so they obviously must vote all the time like Bush and they might as well leave the party" You folks can all kiss my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC