Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chalabi nets 0.36% of the vote in Iraqi elections!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TheGunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:55 AM
Original message
Chalabi nets 0.36% of the vote in Iraqi elections!!!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10575121

WASHINGTON - Iraqi politician Ahmed Chalabi appears to have suffered a humiliating defeat at the recent Iraq polls, according to the uncertified preliminary results.

The news comes just a month after Chalabi had conducted a tour of Washington in an effort to patch up his tattered image in America. Paperwork shows that in November Chalabi’s Washington representative hired a powerful D.C. lobbying firm.


...

Preliminary results in the Iraqi capital of Baghdad indicate that Chalabi’s Iraqi National Congress scored a minuscule 0.36 percent of the votes.

Out of almost 2.5 million voters in Baghdad, only 8,645 voted for Chalabi.

In the Shiite city of Basra, the results indicate he had an equally dismal showing of 0.34 percent of the vote.

In the violent Sunni province of Anbar, 113 people voted for him.


This just might explain the paucity of coverage of the Iraq elections in the days following the election. The US isn't happy...isn't happy at all with the election results. They figured the hundreds of billions of dollars spent surely would have bought them an election. They should have had Diebold in control of the voting bins. Guess the Iraqis told the PNAC/INC cabal to FVCK OFF and went with an Iran-lite party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Geez, WTF did we expect?
Wasn't he the asswipe who told us we'd be greeted with flowers and parades and have staues of * all over the country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. How much money did we give this guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't know but
I think we kept supporting him even after it was determined he had ties to the ruling fundamentalists in Iran. We never fucking learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheGunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. At least $40 million (and enough clout to pressure Jordan to drop charges)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enraged_Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. And arrested for being an Iranian spy to boot!
I guess the Iraqis, unlike people in our country, have a problem with a scumbag criminal gangster being elected to high office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Too funny.......this administration really knows how to pick 'em.
3 years in Iraq and we have a real pulse on the sentiment of the Iraqi people....what a joke this administration is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. But did the administration really want Ahmed?
Sure, they did back in 2003, but it seems like the relationship was ended by Washington's charging him with being an Iranian agent a few months ago. There was no sign his visit to the U.S. this fall succeeded in rehabilitating him in the eyes of the White House.

If anything, I think BushCo would probably be just as happy if, granting that the elections will probably produce a pro-Iranian Shi'ite radical as Iraq's new leader, it not be the one that Americans will remember them touting a couple of years ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guidod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You know it won't be a secular
government.  It'll be more like ours, a dictatorship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Isn't .36 within the margin for a recount?
Get Baker out there now!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warbly Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. should've given the contract to Diebold
i really wonder that they didn't seem to try to manipulate the
polling there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah, funny we aren't hearing too much about the results.
Democracy's a great thing when you get to show people holding up purple fingers for the cameras. It can be a real bitch when the people vote for the wrong candidates.

How soon before Chalabi and Allawi start screaming about election fraud?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. huh?
I don't think he's been "charged" with anything.

He's been getting away with murder and this administration still loves him and lets him visit all the time.

Nothing incriminating has stuck to him, from a prosecution standpoint.

-85%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheGunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Both of them ALREADY HAVE cried fraud! Allawi's called it "illegitimate"!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. Well, duh he is Bush(ere)'s man
Do you the the Iraquis are stupid enough to vote for an obvious shill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. Had BushCheney not terrorized folks in 2004, they would have had the same
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC