Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

People, Hear Me! Hear Me Now!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 08:13 PM
Original message
People, Hear Me! Hear Me Now!
The Bush Crime Family operatives are all over the MSM, morphing the Domestic Spying issue and CRIMINAL actions into a "debatable" question.

They're morphing the matter of CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS into so called "gray areas" of "Presidential Authority" in a "Time of War" and under the rubric of "National Security vs Civil Liberties".

MY GOD PEOPLE!

I URGE YOU ALL!!

Do not let the MSM get away with this!

DON'T let any politician and/or Public Relations (aka "advisors")get away with this!

Don't allow the meme "Clinton did it too" (whether or not it is fact or fiction is NOT the point) to trump the constitutional threats that have been thwarted upon us.

I beg every DU member to contact your respective Senators, Representatives, and Local and National News Media every single day - until the loud resounding call to end these practices cease and desist no matter which party is in power!

Demand the Abolishing of the Patriot Act and call for the joint investigation hearings on Bush, Cheney, Rice & Rumsfeld's wanton violations of our Civil Liberties, BEFORE THE ALITO hearings!

Demand Congress to file INJUNCTIONS against the White House and the Pentagon on ALL DOMESTIC SPYING and to iniate Congressional Oversight wrt any on going interceptions considered as bonafide national security risks and/or interests.

I beg you all, do it now and everyday until these procedures are finally underway, or forever lose your liberty.

Hear me people, we need to restore our rights and we need to do it now.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. hear, hear!
recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Agreed - and don't call them the "MSM"...
They're NOT "mainstream." They're the Corporate Media.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ok... Corporate Media it is!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Thanks!
:hi:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. I beg to differ
By far most people do get by far most of their information about what goes on in the world, from the "corporate media". So the corporate media are by definition the "main stream media".

So in this case "mainstream" and "corporate" are two aspects of the same thing.

In a different place in a different time, the mainstream media might be state media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prairierose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. I call them...
corporate media whores

:grr:

They no longer make any pretense of covering important news or issues. It is all about repeating the WH talking points and press releases.

Why are Americans so woefully ignorant not only of what is happening in the world but in their own country? Because we do not have a working free press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is the problem with the Christmas break.
It allows the administration to almost totally control input to news, and since now the news only repeats what it is told, we can't muster a decent and timely rebuttal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, what you say is quite true..
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 09:25 PM by radio4progressives
But that can work in our favor too I think, in that "most americans" are probably too busy with their holiday plans to be saturated with their message and therefore persuaded by their justifications.

While this period of time does give Bush Co. the time to catapult their propaganda "on message" into the Corporate Media, I think we have the potential to get "on message" for "We the People", by demonstrating over and over to journalists how they too are at risk and their work can be impacted by these violations as well, and to put it back into context as a high crime against the people.

In fact, I heard a parallel scenario posited by Bob Baer yesterday to Andrea Mitchell on Hard Ball - laying out how journalists working on a story of national security importance would be subjected to the same thing as illustrated in the film Syriana (based on Robert Baer's book).

Andrea Mitchell should know something about this, her husband Alan Greenspan was head of the Federal Reserve for the past decade or so, and was privy to matters of national security secrets on a daily basis.

Mitchell isn't someone i generally have much regard for, so it came as a bit of surprise to me to observe her take a position of "advocacy journalism" (one could argue) at least in so far as making an effort to hang on to the pertinent points at issue on this subject.

So i think we could benefit from an unusual alliance with Corporate Media on this matter if we worked at it.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R, Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. And here I thought these Republicans thought the Constitution was so
spiffy.

They kept talking about being Constitutionalists and all.

Apparently some of them haven't read it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What a Ruse! "Strict Constructionists" sheesh! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Bush is quoted as saying, "It's just a goddammed piece of paper."
somewhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yeah... Capital Blue reported that story....
no one seems to know how reliable that source is...

but it's had some pretty interesting "inside" scoops, but always quoting "anonymous sources" .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Rethugs doing what Rethugs do best.
Change the subject, lie distort and spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. Spying on Americans without just cause is indefensible. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eve_was_framed Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. if it's only a "grey areas" issue why was Nixon impeached for it?
Edited on Fri Dec-23-05 12:39 AM by eve_was_framed
correction: why was Nixon forced to resign before he would have been impeached for the very same, i.e., wire tapping! ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Exactly! Why doesn't the Press draw the proper perspective & conclusions?
We were in a "time of war" then, as well.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eve_was_framed Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I'm so sick of the lame ass press giving the anointed simian
a free pass, shit I sure hope this isn't another!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheGunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. We hear thee well. Thankee-sai!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. thanks!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
20. We do need;
A Thomas Paine in our hour of need. Will one step up and be heard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Might it be Russ Feingold??
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC