Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For Sen. Ted Stevens, drilling in Alaska is personal payback

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Thom Little Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 06:13 AM
Original message
For Sen. Ted Stevens, drilling in Alaska is personal payback
The Incredible Hulk appeared Tuesday on the Senate floor, adorning the necktie of Sen. Ted Stevens - a familiar sign that the veteran from Alaska is pumped for the fight to open part of an arctic wildlife refuge to oil drilling.

But to hear his colleagues tell it, Stevens is more like the Grinch who would steal Christmas - and New Year's, if need be - to collect on his end of a vote-swapping deal he struck with two Democrats 25 years ago.

"A promise made is a debt unpaid," Stevens, 82, is fond of repeating. "This is a debt unpaid to this Senate, to the country, to Alaska."

Back in 1980, the deal went like this: Vote yes on setting aside 19 million acres of wilderness, said Sens. Henry "Scoop" Jackson of Washington and Paul Tsongas of Massachusetts, and Congress will support permission to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Stevens agreed. Tsongas and Jackson, meanwhile, died before Congress could grant permission to drill. Their debt survives, Stevens insists. And he's playing procedural hardball to make the Senate pay up.

"We're going to have to face up to ANWR either now or Christmas Day or New Year's Eve or sometime," Stevens thundered from the Senate floor Tuesday, bucking criticism from drilling opponents furious that he succeeded in attaching the drilling permission to a must-pass bill to fund the military.


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/STEVENS_HURRAH_AKOL-?SITE=VARIT&SECTION=US&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2005-12-20-18-20-53
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. elction theft 00 calls off all bets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. The citizens of Alaska got a ton of money from all that oil at Prudhoe
Bay. I can see where they would want some more. Well, if a promise is a debt unpaid, I'd like the government to fullfill all those promises they've made over the centuries. And why is this a must-pass military bill. Don't pass the bill. Bring the troops home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's not a supplemental budget that would just cover Iraq
It covers all salaries and dependants stipends. It is must pass legislation for so many families. Stevens knows that. That's why he is pulling this crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Stevens is an asswipe from way back,ties drilling to a Defense bill..
Edited on Wed Dec-21-05 08:16 AM by OneTwentyoNine
"The extreme environmentalists think it's their playground, that they should set the policies for Alaska," said Sen. Ted Stevens, an Alaska Republican. He was returning fire from his most persistent critics in a long campaign to open ANWR for oil exploration.

How many ways is there to say FUCK YOU STEVENS?!?!?!?!

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/20/congress.roundup.ap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Boy, there must be some BIG under-the-table money in it for him
if he's acting this pissy and irrational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. If Stevens really stood up for alaska he would be fighting for the rights
of the State granted under the Statehood act and taken away by Bush1. The Statehood act is very plain in how natural resources including mineral rights are to be divided between the State and Federal government. The Statehood Act says the split will be 90-10 with the 90% going to the state. Bush1 came along and got Congress to readjust that figure to 50-50 and not one peep out of any of Alaska's Representatives....He certainly is not doing this for his state....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC