Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry Talks to Imus: “They Were Hell Bent for Leather, to Take Out Saddam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:27 PM
Original message
Kerry Talks to Imus: “They Were Hell Bent for Leather, to Take Out Saddam
Kerry Talks to Imus: “They Were Hell Bent for Leather, to Take Out Saddam
December 9, 2005

{snip}

IMUS: OK — that they lied. Why mislead us?

KERRY: Because they were hell bent for leather, determined to take out Saddam Hussein and go to war on a theory of Middle East transformation. And it was the theory of Mr. Wolfowitz and Doug Feith over at the Pentagon and others who had this view. And in retrospect, that’s what was driving things.

IMUS: Remember, for a long time, they tried to tie — I mean, for a long time, you take these polls, people thought that Iraqis were in those planes and flew them into the World Trade Center and in the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania.

KERRY: Yes, they did. And in fact — in fact, the president helped lend to that belief.

Last year during the election, we observed that about 70 percent of the American people or higher, 77 percent of the people supporting George Bush believed that Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11. Now, they didn’t just get there by accident.

And what’s really disturbing about this — and it ought to be to every single person in New York, especially, is that the people we were after who did what they did to New York, and to the Pentagon, and to, you know, the country, came out of Afghanistan, out of al Qaeda, out of Osama bin Laden.

We had Osama bin Laden trapped in the mountains of Tora Bora . But the president and Donald Rumsfeld decided not to use Americans, the best fighting in the world — we have SEALS on the ground there. I’ve talked to some of them.

They wanted to go up after Osama bin Laden. And the orders were never given to bring in the 82nd Airborne or the Marines, or others, surround that mountain, do anything necessary. We outsourced that job to Afghans, who went up in the hills and Osama bin Laden escaped.

There were other ways we could have gotten Osama bin Laden. I think the whole beginning of the war, you know, the three weeks of bombing, lost us the opportunity to take advantage of the fact that we knew they used cell phones, we knew they traveled in convoys.

We have the best special forces in the world, and I think that was the time to have an entebbe-type raid, where you take the time to know with certainty where they are, and then you envelop, and then you go in, and then you can do your bombing and the other things necessary. But the object was to get Osama bin Laden, and frankly, through a series of decisions, they allowed Osama bin Laden to escape.

And I think that’s a much larger issue than a lot of people focus on.

MORE - http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=1356
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Right. The inspections process was just a ruse.
Powell and Blair wanted a fig-leaf of justification for attacking a crippled nation.

So when are the criminal charges forthcoming?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dances with Cats Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. And Kerry voted for them to...
...go right ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Who didn't?
Feingold and a few others this is no biggy unless you live in a black and white extremist and unforgiving world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. They laid out specific conditions for support of a war in Iraq.
And said they would speak out if Bush violated those condidtions.

Bush then proceeded to violate every condition democrats laid forth.

It's taken them over two years to even think about protesting about this. Two years too long. Some democrats have the same blood on their hands as the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Funny
I heard Dems speak out on this over 2 years ago, starting in Jan. '03, before Bush went to war. Of course, I didn't depend on the media to let me know what Dems were saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. So did I, they were called traitors and fools
By republicans and democrats who supported the war. I never heard anyone who voted for the IWR speak out against the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Kerry did
In op-eds and speeches before the war. Remember who asked for regime change here - No not Dean, Kerry. Kerry was against the war as early as Dean was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Speaking out BEFORE the war when Bush asked the inspectors
to leave because we were going in and calling for Regime change here shortly after Bush invaded is that fast enough. There are many that were still for the war 1 or 2 years later, Kerry was clearly not one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. He voted to get the inspectors in. And they did go in. But they were
disregarded when the time came.

He did not vote for Bush Co. to creat the biggest FUBAR in the last 100 years.

He has said he was wrong.

He has accepted his part of the responsibility for us being there.

Unless you like him to slit his wrists or something, I don't know what else you're looking for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. And he never denounced the war in clear terms
It was always, "well I didn't want this, but we are where we are." It's better than some democrats like Lieberman, but I'll still always have a problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well he voted for it before he voted against it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Stupid remark
took a lot of thought, huh? :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yes it was, on Kerry's part.
Edited on Fri Dec-09-05 09:09 PM by doc03
He goes to Vietnam then protests the war. He votes to outlaw shotguns then claims to be a hunter. That's why the flip-flop tag stuck to Kerry. If he thought they were "hell bent for leather' why didn't he say something then? He voted for the IWR because it was politically popular at the time then he voted against the funding because Dean was nipping at his heels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Lame remarks
and so Rovian.

Another added to my ignore list.:nuke: Like talking to a brick wall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Takes guts.
Edited on Fri Dec-09-05 09:21 PM by ProSense
The soldiers who fought in Iraq and are now speaking out against this war should shut up? No, it takes guts.

Do you need an assault weapon to hunt game?

Voting based on the evidence is about popularity?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. He's speaking of what he knows now.
They specifically REMOVED anything that would consider transformation of the region as valid justification when it was negotiated. The new information is from DSM and some of Fitspatrick's work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Uninformed. WTF?
Edited on Sat Dec-10-05 02:08 AM by kerrygoddess
Do you know anything about Kerry or do you just like to spread untruths?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC