Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Storm CLouds Gathering: Scandal could take in at least 12 in Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 04:53 PM
Original message
Storm CLouds Gathering: Scandal could take in at least 12 in Congress
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/051205/5abramoff.htm

12/5/05
Storm Clouds Gathering
Source: Scandal could take in at least a dozen in Congress
By Silla Brush

It's been two years now since federal investigators began trying to untangle the dealings of Washington uberlobbyist Jack Abramoff. But what was once a potential scandal looming over the horizon is now looking more ominous by the day.

Last week's guilty plea by Abramoff's onetime partner, a former top aide to the beleaguered Rep. Tom DeLay, darkened the skies further. Michael Scanlon's admission he had conspired to bribe public officials and defrauded four Indian gaming casinos of millions in fees effectively makes him the government's star witness in a probe that threatens to ensnare officials throughout the nation's capital.

U.S. News has learned that the conduct of at least a dozen representatives and senators is now being scrutinized by a small army of federal prosecutors and FBI agents. According to sources familiar with the inquiry, a federal task force, which includes investigators from the Interior Department--which has authority to regulate Indian reservations--is examining the relationships between lawmakers and Scanlon and Abramoff. A key question is whether the lawmakers took official actions after receiving campaign contributions, free trips, or other gifts from the lobbyists, the sources say.

Trouble. Despite Scanlon's deal with the government, there is no indication yet that Abramoff has made such an arrangement. If he cooperates, one source said, it would spell big problems for some lawmakers and staffers on Capitol Hill. Abramoff, the source said, "arguably has bigger problems than Scanlon. The question is: What is the government willing to give up?"

Abramoff's Washington connections run wide and deep. His biggest clients were Indian tribes running casinos in several states, and he and Scanlon billed them more than $80 million. "It could be the biggest congressional scandal in modern times," says Fred Wertheimer, head of Democracy 21, a nonprofit campaign-finance reform organization.

In his plea agreement, Scanlon said that he and Abramoff, referred to as "Lobbyist A," provided travel, golf fees, entertainment, and campaign contributions to public officials "in exchange for a series of official acts and influence." At least one congressman, widely believed to be Rep. Bob Ney, an Ohio Republican, received trips to the Super Bowl in Tampa and to Scotland, meals at a restaurant owned by Abramoff, and campaign contributions.

SNIP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds Bad
*giggle*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Shame on you
Schadenfreude? You should be ashamed of yourself. (snort, chuffle)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. It's not schadenfreude to wish accountability on bad people.
Edited on Sun Nov-27-05 05:45 PM by longship
I cheer for this to be very, very bad for the GOP which desperately needs accountability for their illegal, immoral actions. When all the perpetrators are thrown out of office and hopefully thrown into prison I will cheer all the more loudly. This is *not* taking glee of other's misfortune. It is holding people to account for their gleeful stomping down of innocents.

So let's all let out a cheer that the moment might soon come when we will be rid of these schmucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Thank you longship. It is neither misfortune nor karma: it is JUSTICE. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Once again, my favorite Somerset Maugham quote:
Edited on Sun Nov-27-05 07:52 PM by belle
"I do not believe I am a vindictive (person); but when the immortal gods take a hand in the matter it is pardonable to observe the result with complacency."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Ooops
I guess I should have used the sarcasm smilie.

As far as I'm concerned, Schadenfreude in a case like this is celebrating the fact that these bastards are having to face the consequences of their actions. IOW, justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. And well put.
Also, it *is* recommended that one use :sarcasm: when posting :sarcasm:

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. My FAVORITE bit in that article!!!
...Despite Scanlon's deal with the government, there is no indication yet that Abramoff has made such an arrangement. If he cooperates, one source said, it would spell big problems for some lawmakers and staffers on Capitol Hill. Abramoff, the source said, "arguably has bigger problems than Scanlon. The question is: What is the government willing to give up?"

It's one thing for these little PACs and interest groups to pony up dough for a pricy defense team for their favorite porky pig politician, another thing ENTIRELY when the legal bills start mounting for staffers with shallow pockets and fixed incomes....and that is where the flipping and singing will start! Ah, how charming! Christmas on K Street--Scrooging them all!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I wonder how many cabinet members are involved?
I heard that there are over 30 investigations going on right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Who knows? This article is focusing on the House and Senate staffers
in that little line--they make decent money, but it ain't the big leagues. If you have been in that game for awhile, you might be making between sixty and a hundred and twenty grand, with a mortgage on a house in Northern VA, notes on a couple of late model cars, the kids' soccer fees and summer camp bills...there ain't a lot of dough left over for fancy schmancy lawyers.

I'll bet there was a ton of arrogance going on--those K St. types just kept on buying the fancy meals, the drinks, and so on, and blatantly picking up the check, and left a paper trail that was easier than breadcrumbs in the forest to follow.


This is a great read on what they can and cannot do--needs ADOBE to open, but worth a look:

http://www.lobbyinginfo.org/documents/CongGiftRules.pdf


A Member or employee of Congress may accept a gift only if it is unsolicited and the:
• Gift is valued at less than $50;
• Aggregate value of gifts from one source in a calendar year is less than $100, though
no gifts with a value below $10 count toward the $100 annual limit;
• Gift is not cash or a cash equivalent (e.g. stocks and bonds). The only exceptions are
gifts made by relatives and parts of an inheritance;5 and the
• Favors or benefits are not offered under circumstances that might be construed by
reasonable persons as influencing the performance of their governmental duties;
These limitations seem to make the gift rules very strict. However, numerous exceptions
dramatically reduce the scope of the regulations.

Exceptions to Congressional Gift Rules
A Member or employee of Congress may accept gifts that exceed the $50 value limit for
individual gifts and $100 annual limit for gifts from one source if they are subject to one of 23
exceptions:
1. Anything for which the Member or employee pays the market value, or does not use
and promptly returns. If it is not practicable to return the item to the giver because it is
perishable, it may be given to an appropriate charity or discarded.
2. Political contributions reported under the law, or attendance at a fundraising event
sponsored by a political organization.9
3. Gifts from relatives. A “relative” means a father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister,
uncle, aunt, great aunt, great uncle, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife,
grandfather, grandmother, grandson, granddaughter, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-inlaw,
daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson,
stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, half sister, or who is the grandfather or
grandmother of the spouse of the individual. Fiancés and fiancées are also subject to
this exception, which is why engagement rings and other tokens are not counted towards the gift limit.
4. Anything, including personal hospitality, provided by an individual on the basis of a personal friendship. However, such gifts may not exceed $250 in value unless the recipient gets approval from the respective Ethics Committee. Though the rule does not
explicitly exempt gifts given because of a significant, personal, dating relationship, the Ethics Committees may grant a waiver permitting the recipient to accept such a gift.
5. Contributions or payments to an approved legal expense trust fund. Officeholders may establish this fund to pay for legal expenses associated with official congressional duties. The individual establishing the fund may make unlimited contributions. However,
contributions to a legal defense fund maintained by a member of the House are limited to $5,000 per year and no lobbyist or foreign agent may contribute to such a fund. In the Senate, contributions to a legal defense fund are limited to $10,000 and no lobbyist,
foreign agent, congressional staff person, corporation or labor union may contribute to it..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. thanks for the info. K Street has become even more corrupt now
that the Dems have been purged from the lobbying firms. (the K Street Project)

PDF's are a no brainer on OSX. It's used extensively in the interface. Every document can be made into a PDF through the print command.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. That purge was a blessing in disguise!!
Our hands are clean, because those bastards tied them behind our backs!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. that's one deal I am glad the Dems were cut out of.
They didn't want to share in the graft, now they don't have anyone else to blame. They did it to themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. West Wing comparison
If Bush has people like Toby and Donna, then they do not have the financial resources to mount huge legal defense costs.

We can only hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clouds, just clouds? Call me when it's a republican mushroom cloud!
They let Saddam DeLay & Abramoff Hussein amass all of those chemical weapons and he is killing his own people. Republicans are just begging to have the RNC occupied by the Green Party. See, because republicans are all about being prepared and stuff... W is having the *mission accomplished* sign laminated and lit for better viewing when he land on the USS Chickenhawk.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. When they get 'Skippy' from Ga....
I will buy a bottle of champagne (Ralph Reed)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Oh Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzzz
let them get Grover Norquist. I, too, will go for the bubbly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. That thought makes me so sad...LOL!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piedras Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hurricane Abramoff
Dare we hope that indictments from hurricane Abramoff hit prior to the 2006 elections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. Are there any Democrats involved with these characters?
Or is it just repukes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is fun. I like watching the news, now. We're restoring honor and
dignity to the white house.

Glad none of these 40-50 officials have had intimate relations with anyone else in the white house, or we'd have a real scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
20. TVC's Sheldon Accepted Big Bucks to Support Gambling, Mislead Followers
October 17, 2005
TVC's Sheldon Accepted Big Bucks to Support Gambling, Mislead Followers

The Washington Post reported Oct. 16 that the Rev. Louis P. Sheldon, head of the Traditional Values Coalition, accepted at least $25,000 in direct funds, and perhaps thousands more in indirect support, from an online gambling company and indicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff in a 2000 campaign to block federal legislation that would have banned online gambling.

Furthermore, former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed reportedly acted as a financial, political and marketing go-between, channeling (laundering) funds in a $2 million pro-gambling campaign involving former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay's office, the gambling industry, and Christian rightists allied with Reed and Sheldon who were willing to accept money without knowing its source; shoot down antigambling legislation without concern for the facts; and battle fellow Christian rightists.

When the campaign briefly went sour, and Sheldon's lying was exposed, Sheldon diverted attention with an attack on homosexuals.

As XGW noted last week, Sheldon continues to exploit homosexuals to divert attention from his own unethical behavior.

According to the Post,

{Reed and Sheldon} kept in close contact with Abramoff about the arrangement, e-mails show. Abramoff also turned to prominent anti-tax conservative Grover Norquist, arranging to route some of eLottery's money for Reed through Norquist's group, Americans for Tax Reform.

At one point, eLottery's backers even circulated a forged letter of support from Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R).

{DeLay aide Tony C.} Rudy declined to comment for this report. A spokesman for Reed -- now a candidate for lieutenant governor of Georgia -- said that he and his associates are unaware that any money they received came from gambling activities. Sheldon said that he could not remember receiving eLottery money and that he was unaware that Abramoff was involved in the campaign to defeat the bill. Norquist's group would say only that it had opposed the gambling ban on libertarian grounds.

More:
http://www.exgaywatch.com/blog/archives/2005/10/tvcs_sheldon_ac.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
23.  The republicn party is a criminal enterprise.
The operation of the Abramoff-DeLay crime family is just one example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
24. Is Richard Pombo one of these scoundrels?
Please, please, please.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC