Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who would be the best VP choice for Clark?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:15 PM
Original message
Who would be the best VP choice for Clark?
Edwards, Graham, or other?

Since Kerry supporters are speculating.
(And *boy* is it speculative.)

I'm leaning Edwards...
That would be some serious charisma between the two of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dark Star Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Edwards or
someone not running for the nomination. Perhaps Myra, xultar, Jack Dawson or Newjerseycoa...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey, I started that thread!
So go easy...

I think he'd go w/ someone out west like Bill Richardson.

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mobius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dean
im not kidding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Star Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. You really have to be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mobius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. come on
who would get the most votes? We had Qualyle for a VP, dont try to tell me Dean would be worse than Quayle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. Bush was branching off of an administration that was re-elected...
With 49 states. I don't think Dan Quayle made a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Dupe
Edited on Thu Jan-29-04 06:37 PM by Hippo_Tron
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rogerashton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. I agree.
Not another southerner -- regional balance. The ticket would be strong against the wrong war at the wrong time -- both candidates are in the same (correct) place on that -- while Dean's populism is a good balance for Clark's informed pragmatism. Is there such a thing as emotional balance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'd say Edwards.
Could be looking at 16 years of prosperity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Good point MrSlayer. In 8 years Edwards will only be 38 years old.
Kidding! I know he's 50. But that's ideal looking forward...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clark/Edwards would be a seriously kickass ticket.
I'm really looking forward to next week's results, esp. for C & E.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Edwards
Clark/Edwards what a team. Thinking ahead 8 years, Edwards be just right for President by then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Edwards as well
He is great on domestic issues, shore up southern votes, charisma and some inside the beltway experience is helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Edwards would make the ticket unstoppable.
They've run a clean, positive, hopeful campaign. They give people reason to vote FOR them, instead of just AGAINST Bush. Gotta have that carrot and stick to get people to the polls!

I can see Richardson too. He's one of the good guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Edwards, definitely.
But keep your mitts off Richardson. We badly need him right here in New Mexico, and besides he's vowed to finish out his full term as governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arbustosux Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. How about Bill Richardson?
He is hispanic and would represent a previously underepresented portion of the population and will silence Repub claims we are anti-hispanic.

Best of all is who did Bush call on when he needed a special envoy to North Korea? Bill Richardson! We could use that against shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. As always....I'm cautious about this
I really, really like Bob Graham for VP but admit that Edwards would also be dynamite.......

Graham's experience in knowing which buttons to push in Congress is great, but then Edwards youthful exhuberance is eqaully good.


<sigh> I think too much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Gephardt, Edwards or Richardson.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Havent
thought it out yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kclown Donating Member (459 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Charlie Rangel
Clark-Rangel could not be beat.  
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think he will pick someone really surprising
a woman or a minority for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gato Moteado Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. clark's short list should include
richardson
edwards
hillary

and, yes, dean. i would love to watch dean run dirty dick through a sausage grinder in the vp debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. Dick Durbin anyone????
That man kicks some serious butt! He is good on all the issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tummler Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Bob Graham
Edited on Thu Jan-29-04 04:41 PM by Tummler
Graham has the legislative experience to help the "outsider" Clark in dealing with Congress. Graham has the executive experience to step in as President, should misfortune befall President Clark (God forbid). Graham has decades worth of Democratic Party credentials to reassure those Democrats who are uneasy with a political newcomer at the top of the ticket. Perhaps most critically, Graham would keep Florida in play (BBV issues aside).

What would Edwards really add to a Clark ticket? Clark already appeals to Southerners and centrists. Edwards wouldn't bring any particularly impressive experience (political or otherwise) to the ticket. Unlike Graham, Edwards wouldn't put any critical states in play; heck, I doubt that Edwards in the VP slot would guarantee victories in either of the Carolinas.

OK, so Edwards could use the VP position as a platform for a future Presidential run. So what? Winning NOW is more important than attempting to hand Edwards some kind of vague, theoretical advantage in 2012. Besides, Edwards could use his Attorney General role in the Clark Presidency to maintain/heighten his profile in preparation for that 2012 campaign.

On edit: having said that, Edwards would still be in my top three to join Clark on the ticket. He's a relatively safe choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Star Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. A friend pointed out
to me how delightful it would be to smash Bush in Floriduh with Graham as Clark's VP. It's something to think about anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. Does Florida even like Graham?
I mean, would he have won re-election had he decided to run again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. Edwards.
Kerry wouldn't be bad either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. Edwards.
Definitely Edwards!
At this point even though I've liked Clark since the beginning, I'm really in love with the possibility of an Edwards-Clark ticket. It just sounds right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. Feingold
Edited on Thu Jan-29-04 05:06 PM by lcordero
Because it will further reinforce that he is honest about transparency in government, his commitment to the Constitution, and quell a Progressive revolution/exodus.

on edit: and it would help to create the next generation of Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ludwigb Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
27. I like Graham
He's obviously an exceedlingly competent and patriotic old geezer so he matches well with Clark. I would just hope he would be amenable to being replaced in 2008 with someone younger like Edwards. Gephardt would also be a good choice--gives the ticket an extra infusion of old fashioned decency and it might make Missouri competitive and help mobilize labor. I like Edwards a lot too--having 2 southerners might help open up a lot of states, and Johnny could help appeal to women.

My heartfelt choice for Clark would be Russ Feingold, but Clark should be able to win Wisconsin on his own. I've never actually seen Richardson so I don't know about him, but he sounds great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MR. ELECTABLE Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
28. I've heard a name being floated around: Evan Bayh
The rumor I heard is that the "DLC" candidates Kerry, Edwards, and Clark (although I DO NOT think he's part of the DLC) have already agreed to Evan Bayh as the VP choice. He's from my old home state of Indiana which is always nice BUT he's one of the founding members of the DLC.

YUCK!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SadEagle Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
29. Graham, Kerry, or an another senior Democrat.
Not based as much on election chances (I think they're pretty good either way), but on needing a person w/long congressional experience to help deal w/the congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
32. Clark's already from the south, And Edwards'...
Fairly liberal voting record isn't going to get him any more swing votes in the south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC