Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain is a PIG!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:49 PM
Original message
McCain is a PIG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Geez, who still thinks McCain is a good guy??
SCHIEFFER: President Bush accused his critics of rewriting history last week.

Sen. McCAIN: Yeah.

SCHIEFFER: And in--he said in doing so, the criticisms they were making of his war policy was endangering our troops in Iraq. Do you believe it is unpatriotic to criticize the Iraq policy?

Sen. McCAIN: No, I think it's a very legitimate aspect of American life to criticize and to disagree and to debate. But I want to say I think it's a lie to say that the president lied to the American people. I sat on the Robb-Silverman Commission. I saw many, many analysts that came before that committee. I asked every one of them--I said, `Did--were you ever pressured politically or any other way to change your analysis of the situation as you saw?' Every one of them said no. Now was there a colossal intelligence failure? Of course, there was. Is there still a lot of things that need to be done to improve that? Are we winning the war on terror? I think it depends on your parameters. But to assert that the president intentionally lied to the American people is just wrong. And could I finally say, every intelligence agency in the world, including the Russian, including the French, including the Israeli, all had--reached the same conclusion, and that was that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. So I think open, honest disagreement, more discussion, more debate, the more facts that come out, the better off we are, but I would not accept the premise the president lied.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't understand how a guy who was a POW for five years
isn't in the streets screaming at the top of his lungs against the admin's position on torture.

I remember Rush once saying he thought McCain exaggerated his time as a POW for political points - makes you wonder about his silence (I know he's not silent, but he should be on top of a building with a loudspeaker).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. He has been vocal about the torture thing
McCain is quite vocal on the torture thing, in fact. But he's always been a supporter of the war itself, and highly critical of the shoddly mismanagement of the post-war occupation.

The position that him and Chuck Hagel and a few others have stakes of is really the extent of the limb that any GOP member is gonig to take. It is a rare breed that has enough balls to bite the hand that feeds if the cause is just enough. Jim Jeffords was one of those, but we're unlikely to see another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. McCain seems to be very polite when discussing the torture issue.
He needs to put it in perspective of the repubs moral values. Put it in perspective of bush's "high moral ground."

A "Christian" nation should not even be discussing this. if they are, things are not what they seem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. here is what the washington post says about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. This is a matter of definitions --
Edited on Mon Nov-14-05 07:19 PM by necso
and taking advantage of one or the other (or multiple, by attaching them to different things) when it suits your ends.

To me, to lie is: to communicate that which is not true; to lead others to believe, or in other ways make them believe, that which is not true; to create the appearance of truth as cover for that which is not; or to otherwise deceive others -- intentionally or not.

On the other hand, the definition implicitly being used (being taken advantage of) by defenders of this regime (when they say w&co are not liars) would require that the liar be deliberate and intentional in his deceptions. But this is nonsense, as it's only the truth that matters, not one's careless habits -- for it's truth, not fiction, that drives mainstream reality -- if not so the minds of fools. Moreover, such a definition has a ready escape built into it; the liar need only say that his lying was unintentional, that "he didn't know that he wasn't telling the truth".

And this essentially frees people from the responsibility of learning the truth*, giving rise to a class (and culture) of bullshitters, who care nothing for truth, and who are free to cherry-pick any claims (or make up claims for that matter) that suit their ends, without engaging in any real scrutiny of these foundational elements (although, perhaps, while creating and maintaining the appearance of such scrutiny).

And this is no basis on which a society can function, much less build upon.

Rather, to function as a society (and most certainly as a reason-based, informed, effective, modern, technological society), people must scrupulously verify that which they would hold to be true. And this is especially true if they would pass on this "information" to others as truth... And this is most especially true of those in leadership positions and those in whom trust is placed.

Moreover, if the matter at hand is one of great importance, then the greatest possible scrutiny must be applied to any relevant "information", no matter how unpleasant the results of this scrutiny may turn out to be. And one must always be suspicious of any "information" that one wishes to believe, because one will be tempted not to vet it properly -- and because it takes no more than a rotten keystone to endanger the whole structure of "knowledge"-- and everything based upon it.

But by either definition, we were lied into this war. It's just that proving deliberate deception is difficult when dealing with practiced and proficient liars.

And Senator McCain is using one definition (deliberate deception) to protect the administration, while at the same time effectively using another (telling an untruth, deliberately or not) to attack its critics.

Shame, Senator, shame.

...

One of the most important things in life is to never suspend disbelief -- particularly when others are trying hard to make you do so -- for they will often have their own advantage (and your ruthless exploitation) in mind.

In all things, let the "buyer" beware.

...

*: Indeed, if it runs counter to their ends, exposing the truth can be disadvantageous to bullshitters -- and therefore learning it entails some risk, should exposure follow -- and the pursuit of truth itself becomes potentially disadvantageous and something generally to be avoided.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Busted!
Right wing talking point:

Did--were you ever pressured politically or any other way to change your analysis of the situation as you saw?' Every one of them said no. Now was there a colossal intelligence failure? Of course, there was.

And could I finally say, every intelligence agency in the world, including the Russian, including the French, including the Israeli, all had--reached the same conclusion, and that was that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. This did it for me. I don't trust him.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Intel failure goes hand in hand with support for Bush
"Now was there a colossal intelligence failure? Of course, there was."

Yes, those in power ignored or kept out intell the administration didn't want !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. what's that look on McCain's face. is he having an orgasm? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nawww! kerry's potential VP? You must be imagining things...
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wow, I think alot of the Kerry/McCain 04 folks should hang their heads....
in shame.

I kept seeing that crap posted and I kept telling folks this guy is a republican through and through. He's just better at wearing his sheep clothing to disguise who he is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jon8503 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. I lost my respect for this guy after he stood by Bush after Bush
slimed McCain and his wife. How could you ever have any self-respect to support someone who said the things they did about him and his family.
Also, I think the dems should go after him now as it looks like he could be a candidate for Pres in 08.

If he is going to stand by Bush and say he did not mislead, then he is fair game for a response from the Democrats now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jon8503 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. And another thing, how in the hell could someone like McCain
or any veteran have respect for this administration. You have Bush who didn't even attend his guard meetings and went AWOL. You have his VP who got deferment after deferment to keep from going to the military. Somebody help me with that one. McCain must be suffering from something to have anything to do with these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. A guest at the Hanoi Hilton for 5 1/2 years and . . .
. . . he gets punked by the likes of Bush. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. I lost respect for him during the Savings & Loan scandals. He
was right in the middle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Finder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well he was one of the original PNACers...
which many do not realize. Bush is not the one who lied purposely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. He is a pig and the dumb pig still thinks it is 1999
His act is way way over ---- He is one big asshole IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. John McCain, Hypocrite
John McCain, Hypocrite
by Doug Ireland

John McCain, the media's darling, has found a clever way around his own campaign finance reform law to take big corporate bucks in furtherance of his political ambitions while carrying water for the corporate mammoth providing the dough. But the national press is ignoring the story.


The Associated Press first ran the story of John McCain's odorous but lucrative Senatorial service to the communications giant Cablevision on the afternoon of March 7. But, while some local papers in McCain's home state (like the East Valley Tribune) have run the story, nothing has as yet made it into the print editions of the New York Times, the L.A. Times, the Washington Post, or any of the half-dozen other big city dailies I checked (although, if one searches the hundreds of AP stories available on the Post's website on its Politics page by clicking on "Latest Wire Reports," one can find it there--but how many readers would bother to do that?) One notable exception: the Kansas City Star.


Here's what the AP's investigation found:


McCain repeatedly intervened on behalf of a policy Cablevision favored -- one which "congressional and private studies conclude could make cable more expensive" -- while his chief political adviser, Rick Davis (who's masterminding McCain's probable '08 presidential rerun) solicited $200,000 in contributions from Cablevision to an institute that promotes McCain and pays Davis a $110,000 annual salary.


The Reform Institute was set up to promote McCain and his issues--especially campaign finance reform, embodied in the famous McCain-Feingold law. This Institute is "a tax-exempt group that touts McCain's views and has showcased him at events since his unsuccessful 2000 presidential campaign," and it "often uses the senator's name in press releases and fund-raising letters and includes him at press conferences," the AP says. And, of course, it provides a cushy sinecure with no heavy lifting for McCain's main man, Davis, as he prepares the pontificating Senator's next presidential run. Cablevision's contributions account for a whopping 15% of the Institute's budget.


http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0309-35.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. McCain keeps shitting on his own damn self
with this kind of appearance.

Too bad, you're going down with the rest of the Johnny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoteric lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. McCain is lying
Many foreign intelligence agencies agreed that he had WMD in the past but were skeptical that he still had them at all or an infrastructure to produce them. They wanted inspectors to go in and do their job. Only a few countries felt he was an immediate threat. To say that everyone felt he had WMD's is a gross simplification and generalization.

I'm sorry, but saying that no one said Saddam wasn't a threat is like a four-year-old with his fingers in his ears running around like a menace, while others are telling him what he is doing is wrong. Just because you didn't hear them, doesn't mean no one was telling him that he was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Someone please tell McCain that the wall has been torn down already
He still thinks it is 1984!!! with his views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. Glenn Reynolds the blooger on this piece is known as the "warblooger"
for his push to go to war.

Glenn Reynolds, a rightwing commentator who said that "an armed society is a polite society" I'm sure that reasoning is working really well in western pakistan where everyone is armed and "so polite".

He is a neocon asswipe for the administration

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenndar Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. And he's blogging to whom?
The 4.5% or whatever of Americans who still support the war?

What a huge misstep for McCain. I hope the independents and the dems who are still in the dark about him are paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. I'm going to e-mail him enlistment papers
If he can't go, then I'm sure he can send one of his children.

http://usmilitary.about.com/library/pdf/enlistment.pdf

DU activists should all have a supply of these on hand, and a link at the ready. It adds lots of flavor to any argument over the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Excellent idea. And if the chickenhawks won't enlist,
let's start a special "chickenhawk draft" for them only!

Can't wait to see Commandant Bill Kristol in his sexy desert fatigues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shantipriya Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. McCain
He is an unprincipled,opportunistic SOB!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
23. He's not a pig...
... Rove has him by the balls -- he's gotta get out there and spin the bullshit line 'don't call the president a liar' and wag his finger if he ever wants to be invited to the GOP 'big boys' table again.



I think people hold a candle up for McCain because he's the last hope of a sane GOP. Really, he's bought and paid for by Rove, and I pity him. I've got as much respect for McCain as I have for that Uncle Tom Powell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGirl7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. that's not a new...
McCain is a true republican pig...He sticks by * no matter how many times * stabs him in the back, kisses up to the Fundies, by going on a hot date with Fatass Falwell a couple of weeks ago, and spits out RW talking points blaming the Democrats...a true republican pig if I ever saw one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
29. Don't insult pigs
like that. Contrary to popular opinion they are clean and very intelligent and I am pretty sure they would NEVER whore themselves out for political gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
30. His Presidential ambitions are done with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
31. John McCain: Proud member of the Keating Five.
He was crooked then, he is crooked now. He is an attention whore. He plays both sides of the fence. In a word, he is despicable.

McCain vs. Cheney: Despicable vs. Despicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
32. Oh...did we SUDDENLY find those WMD McCain?!?!?
And you have the FUCKING balls to get on TV and trash Dems because they NOW question Bush and his motives??

I've said it over and over Bush and Rove must have pictures of McCain naked with em...something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
34. Fat & Skinny went to town
Whenever I hear the name John McCain all I can think of is his Democratic twin Lieberman. They both stand for NOTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
35. Smearing Dems as liars while denying Cheney ,Libby and Rove lied
Typical Repub strategy is to accuse Dems of the same wrongdoing the Repubs have been caught doing in order to neutralize their wrongdoing as part of damage control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. Oh Man... Did you ever get that right! Warmonger #3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
37. He must think R's can carry the next election on their own
His imitation of Newt Gingrich isn't going to sell with moderate voters.

I think this confirms the theory that the RNC is trying to be sold to the public as Bush's successor, hence his silly attacks to divert attention from RNC / Bush scandals. They're really out of touch with reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
38. Say it aint so John- what about the "Straight Talk?"
What a faker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
39. John McCain is nothing but a fi' dolla' 'ho.... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC