Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Ron Wyden: A Democratic Plan for Tax Reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 09:11 PM
Original message
Senator Ron Wyden: A Democratic Plan for Tax Reform
A top Republican priority in this session of Congress has been on “tax reform”. Yet, we know instinctively that when a Republican preaches tax reform that the resulting changes will help those at the top and hurt the lower and middle classes.

Two of the proposals you most often hear about are the FAIR tax and the “Flat” tax. The FAIR tax is a national sales tax of 23%, which is shockingly regressive and would really hurt the growth of our economy by discouraging spending on goods and service. The “flat” tax has been made popular by the ultra-wealthy Republican Steve Forbes and advocates a single tax rate on income. While the flat tax on the surface may sound like a good idea, it is yet another regressive scheme to help the wealthy avoid paying taxes. Under the flat tax, capital gains, interest, dividends and income from flow-through businesses are untaxed while salaries, wages and other earned income are taxed. Corporate income taxes are entirely eliminated.

Democrats are often attacked for having “no ideas” (although the Republicans have the power to stop any Democratic legislation from coming to the floor for a vote). Thankfully, Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon has come up with a plan to reform a tax system is a way that truly reflects Democratic values. It succeeds in addressing four core tax ideas that Democrats can agree on:

1) a simpler, more efficient tax system
2) a more progressive tax system
3) a tax system that doesn’t reward wealth over work
4) a cut in taxes for the middle and lower class

Senator Wyden’s plan eliminates the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) while downsizing the Form 1040/Schedule A to one page (30 total lines). The various itemized deductions of the current Schedule A are pared down to deductions for mortgage interest and charitable contributions, while providing a 10% tax credit for state taxes paid (including real estate taxes, sales taxes, state income taxes, and state personal property taxes). The plan lowers the number of marginal tax brackets down to three, with rates of 15%, 25%, and 35%. The standard deduction is increased while the Earned Income Credit (EIC) for low-wage workers is maintained. A copy of a proposed 1040 form can be viewed here:

New Form 1040
http://wyden.senate.gov/PDF%27s/Wyden%20Fair%20Flat%20Tax%20Act%20-%20Sample%201040.pdf

Perhaps one of the most appealing aspects of Senator Wyden’s plan is that all income will be treated equally. Thus, income from interest, dividends, short-term and long-term capital gains, and flow-through income will be treated exactly the same as income from salaries, wages and commissions. We as Democrats often talk about how Republicans value “wealth over work”, and Senator Wyden’s tax reform plan would change that. In addition, families with income up to $150,000 would receive a tax cut under this plan (so much for the meme about Democrats raising taxes on the middle class).

The corporate tax rate is set at a flat tax of 35%, with many current loopholes being closed to make sure corporations pay their fair share. Taking all the changes into account, the new tax reform is projected to reduce the federal deficit by $100 billion over the next 5 years.

I have been waiting for Democrats to roll out a sensible tax reform plan, and I am very pleased at Senator Wyden’s plan. If I had to write an ideal tax reform legislation, it would be almost exactly the same as this. Does this have any chance of getting through the Republican-controlled Finance Committee? Likely not. But this seems like a great piece of legislation that Democrats can run on in future campaigns to counter the Republicans’ calls for tax reform. This legislation beats them at their own game. You can read the text of the legislation here:

Fair Flat Tax Act of 2005
http://wyden.senate.gov/PDF%27s/Wyden%20Fair%20Flat%20Tax%20Act%20-%20Legislation.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wyden's plan would kill New Yorkers who need full state/local deductions
Edited on Sat Nov-12-05 09:14 PM by David Dunham
Californians would be hard hit too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Full state deductions are dead as the GOP will be allowing only sales tax
deductions - not income tax deductions - in the SOTU tax plan.

This plan, with the income from wealth taxed at the same rate as the income from wages, looks like a beautiful tax plan.

Our choice is a consumption only tax - either via the current system and revisions on tax rates and deductibles getting a "savings promoting" - which studies show is a lie - income tax that exempts most savings income, or via a "FAIR TAX" which is really a Natiuonal Sales Tax.

In that light, This Dem plan looks great to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds a lot better...
... than anything the Rethugs have floated. Have a couple small concerns but overall that is the direction we need to be going, less complication/deductions, higher marginal rates on high earners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. In what world is $150,000 middle class?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The NYC metro area, for example
Edited on Sat Nov-12-05 09:29 PM by Ignacio Upton
$80,000-$150,000 is a barely livable income in most suburbs around here. This income gets you a 2 bedroom ranch house for $600,000 at least. I think that LA, SF, and Seattle also have similar high costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. So we should base an entire tax structure on large urban area incomes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. A LOT of people happen to live in cities/suburbs
Moreso than someone living in Nebraska, Iowa, or Maine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The numbers in a given population are only relevant if adjustments
are not made. So why are adjustments not made to account for populations outside large urban areas? You can't call it a fair tax if it doesn't account for regional differences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. In San Francisco,
With rent for a 2 bedroom apartment averaging $2500.00 a month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't trust Wyden
He voted to take judges' discretion away on habeus corpus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yep, he keeps some unsavory company...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. He also voted for the Medicare scam
Despite being an early leader of the Grey panthers (a senior advocacy group).

You're absolutely correct not to trust him.

That said, he's by no means the worst of the lot, and there are some elements of the plan worth considering- and that a rational Congress might actually pass.

The 10% credit will hit Oregonians hard- so that's actually a plus for Wyden.

Not sure about having only 3 brackets- wonder what the logic behind that is. Seems to me that would promote cheating when people are close to the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC