Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The anatomy of a primary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
absyntheNsugar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 01:02 PM
Original message
The anatomy of a primary
Having worked on both ends (as a reporter and on a campaign) let me give out a simple anatomy of how a primary works.

1st phase (pre-primary):

- Junior reporters who show talent cover this part
- Candidates formulate their image
- Controversial positions are 'field tested'
- Two goals for a candidate: raise money and build your base

During this time, the junior reporters who are younger and often left-leaning provide the bulk of coverage. This is their chance to sell their stories and build their names. As a result, they often cover the more controversial candidates, and focus on idealism.

The candidates know this, and so they stake out more risky positions and speeches to get the coverage. At the same time, however, they have to raise money if they expect to survive - so they are constantly switching back between meeting with 'the people' (the base) and donors.

2nd phase (before NH and IA):

- Mix of junior reporters who are doing well on a series and veterans to replace some junior reporters.
- Candidates refine their image and go with what worked
- No new positions
- Continue to raise money, keep base. Search out undecideds.
- Move to the center (slowly, as not to disenfranchise base)

Junior reporters who are on a 'hot story' stay on assignment. Those who didn't get a good story go back to police blotter back home. Candidates who identified themselves as 'anti-x' stay with that. During this time, a candidate will have his 'stump speech' memorized and will play it like a hit single on a top 40 station. They continue to raise money, but they are now looking for undecideds. During this time, they will move to the center - but not too quickly. Moving too quickly will annoy the die-hards.

3rd phase (post Iowa - we are here):

- All junior reporters have left; Only veterans remain
- Senior reporters are jaded and looking for 'leads that bleed' rather than messages
- Candidates stick with what works, but tone down edgier positions
- All are converging to the center at this point

We are here now. My guess is that on the night the caucus results were tabulated in Iowa, it was only veteran reporters around. Dean made a gross error - he thought he was dealing with the younger reporters who were concentrating on his message rather than older reporters who were looking for a car wreck.

During this time, all of the candidates make a trot to the center. They will tone down their more edgier rhetoric, knowing they might be the candidate that goes against Bush in Nov. At that time, they will need approval from Democrats AND Republicans - so if they are still talking about health care, this might hurt them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is very interesting.
Thanks for sharing your perspective. I have worked on statewide campaigns, but never on a presidential, and I've never worked as a reporter. So this is new to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC