Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Panama angry over US weapons left along canal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 12:56 PM
Original message
Panama angry over US weapons left along canal

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051105/ts_nm/panama_usa_weapons_dc

- When the U.S. military handed over control of the Panama Canal in 1999, it left behind thousands of unexploded weapons strewn across jungle firing ranges that are still killing people.

Many Panamanians accuse the United States of ignoring the dangers and
President George W. Bush will face protests over the controversy during a visit starting on Sunday night.

-snip-

Around 30,000 acres were cleaned but 8,000 acres are still scattered with live mortars, grenades, bombs, rockets and Agent Orange residue. Outside the canal zone, seven mustard gas bombs weighing between 500 pounds and 1,000 pounds were abandoned on Panama's uninhabited Pacific island of San Jose.

-snip-

The restricted areas have minimal security beyond a few faded warning signs, and those near Escobal run alongside a national park renowned among bird-watchers.

The United States says the jungle is too dense to cut a path through for bomb disposal experts, and warn that trying it would erode the topsoil and silt up the canal.
-snip-
-----------------------------------

aaaarrrrrggggghhhhh



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
drdtroit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. "The United States says the jungle is too dense to cut a path through ..."
Ever hear of a fuckin' helicopter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gosh it almost sounds like they are
PRETENDING TO CARE ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT!!!??

ugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I have to admit
Georgie has nothing to do with this one, didnt build it, didnt give it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think the rest of the world is getting tired of our excuses...........
The U.S. made the 'mess', now we should clean it up. I can't wait for the day when we have a socially responsible government. If our government did the right thing they would not have to spend so much on our own weapons and military of mass destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pushycat Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Leaving mustard gas bombs around is NUTS. Wouldn't a
TAIRIST like to have something like that?
It appears that the little defense budget is too poor to allocate funds for line items like 'cleaning up toxic operations and ordinance'. This is similar to the Army's dumping mustard gas containers off the Virginia Coast or the SF Naval Shipyard at Hunters Point (http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/hunters_point.htm).

Military budget planners have all the resources they need to estimate and plan for clean up costs related to base operations. They just lack the will to do what any ordinary business would be required to do when vacating a location. A case in point is the independent gas station owners who went out of business in the late 70's because of the environmental costs of leaky storage tanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I suggest you go to
http://www.greatwar.nl/gifgas/houthulst-eng.html

You don't live in the worst country of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pushycat Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Went there... The cost of war is so high, so why so much of it. damn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That is the question
I don't think the answer is known. Or ever will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC