Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alito is correct. Men's rights need to be protected.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 10:07 AM
Original message
Alito is correct. Men's rights need to be protected.
We men have been discriminated against for years. After all, of the 114 individuals who have sereved on the Supreme Court of the United States, two of them have been women! Of the 1,875 U. S. Senators, 33 have been women! And of the 10,537 people who have served in the House of Representatives, 203 have been penis-challenged! What the Hell do they want?
Now granted, the 43 Presidents and 46 Vice-Presidents of the U.S have all been men, but shit, on a few occasions a little lady has at least been allowed to run for those offices.
So quit yer bitching and don't worry your pretty little head, Sugar Britches. Uncle Scalito really does know what's best for you AND your uterus.

:sarcasm: (I thought it was pretty obvious, but you never know.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 10:12 AM
Original message
"sugar britches"???
yee haw!

:evilgrin:

Oh and more than that -- I'm sure Uncle Scalito also thinks that married couples shouldn't have access to birth control . . . and everything else that implies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. So what did Uncle Scalito use for birth control?
Did anyone see Scalito's litter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. But they also shouldn't have access to cervical cancer vaccine because
that might make them think of sex.


These people are so whacked! Has the potential for cervical cancer EVER in the course of human history prevented someone from thinking about or engaging in sex?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Itsa good thing you put that little :scarcasm: thing in here...
....or I'd be calling for your head in a guillotine! }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC