Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To so-called pro-lifers: Mind your own Business!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:53 PM
Original message
To so-called pro-lifers: Mind your own Business!
I haven't encountered one pro-lifers who can tell me how abortion effects them enough to make them want to ban it. My response to them is to shut up and mind their own business, because this issue doesn't effect you in your everyday life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Patchuli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have agreed
that the one with the uterus has the right to decide. It doesn't matter if *I* approve of abortion or not. I'm not bearing that child or paying for that child and it's up to the one who is. As for their reckoning in the hereafter, that's between them and their Maker. This is a big MYOB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. While I am pro-choice, I do think that the woman should be required to
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 11:02 PM by Dark
at least notify the father (if she knows who he is) before having an abortion. (Except in the case of rape.)

It could be that the father will say that he will take full care of the child, and the mother won't have any obligations, which may change her mind.

That's fine with me. I fully encourage anyone who wants to persuade a woman not to have an abortion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. It shouldn't be made law n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, it should.
Just because a man isn't carrying the baby doesn't mean that he shouldn't at least be heard. I'm not saying he should be able to legally force a woman to do anything, but he should at least know and be able to talk to her.

Still, in the end it's her choice. But anything that might convince a woman to not have an abortion is okay with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Another thread brought up this scenario...
Say the guy is an asshole...a wife-beater...a criminal....

Should she be legally obligated to tell him and hope he doesn't beat the hell out of her, lock her up or kill her?

I don't believe a woman should be legally obligated to tell a man what she plans on doing with her body. No exceptions. It's too much like asking permission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Whoa, great minds think alike.
See my post below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I cannot believe you think that should be the responsibility of government
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 11:24 PM by impeachdubya
I mean, I don't know about you, but MY tax dollars are far too busy as it is, waging bullshit wars based on bald-faced lies, tracking down pot smoking cancer grannies and locking up millions of non-violent drug offenders, and paying for FBI agents to make a war on porn produced by and for consenting adults "a #1 priority".

Aside from the privacy and constitutional issues- and they are considerable- where, pray tell, is the money going to come from to pay for this massive law enforcement apparatus to track down pregnant women who want to abort (and are we talking about ALL abortion? RU-486? What about the morning after pill? Some right-wingers think the birth control pill causes abortions- will those women need to go before a judge or a panel of strangers, as well?) and then making sure they "notify" the man who is allegedly responsible for the pregnancy. And then, who's going to verify that she didn't just grab some dude off the street?

You're going to need paternity checks for all these men, too. Add to that that some women may not be sure which man made them pregnant. I mean, hey, I was young once, too- it's not inconceivable (ouch. excuse the pun)... Then there's rape victims. Then there's incest, abusive spouses, who knows what else. So while it may sound good to you to say that the man "should be heard"... making something like that law-- just like trying to legislate parental notification, just like legislating "waiting periods", just like legislating these little educational mandates that assume a woman wanting an abortion must not know what she's doing-- just like all these backdoor attempts to take the choice out of the only hands where it makes any fucking sense at all, namely: the woman in whose body the pregnancy is taking place, if you think them through to their logical, real-world conclusion, they make for really, really, really shitty law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Suppose a woman is married to a real jerk...
(it happens), so she has an extramarital affair and accidentally gets pregnant (that also happens). Now assume that the jerk husband has had a vasectomy. Do you still think she needs to get his permission before having an abortion? I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Great minds rule!
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Well,
until the father also agrees to gain the sixty or seventy pounds, enjoy the hemorrhoids, the swollen ankles, the hormonal rages, the inability to sleep well, even on your back, and the terrific joy of a (maybe) 24-hour labor, I don't see where he has any say in any of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. How about a strong emphasis on prevention of pregnancy then
we won't have issues regarding paternal notification.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tell them to look at how people treat each other AFTER THEY ARE BORN.
Given my past, there are times I would have felt better if I was aborted.

I know there are those with childhoods worse than mine, but I can say with assuredness that 98% of you haven't had to go through the hell I had. And the remaining 2% I truly, truly feel for.

We need to work on how the living treat each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Bingo. I was born to a mother who had me out of some misplaced
sense of duty, and she never missed a chance to let me know what a terrible drag I was on her life, how expensive I was, etc.

Why would anybody insist a child be born to a woman who doesn't want it? Why don't these right-wingers ever consider the emotional welfare of the child?

The state of non-existence is not miserable. The state of being an unwanted, abused child is about as miserable as it gets, and the goal of creating miserable children who will grow up to be asocial if not anti-social, is a goal I can't quite comprehend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Can we make a deal to reframe this? We are all pro-life. They
are anti-choice. You can be pro-life and pro-choice and we need to keep reminding each other of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. i concur n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would direct it at anti-choicers...
There are plenty of people who are solidly against abortion, but don't believe the government has a place in which to regulate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's a theocratic thing with the Bushbots.
I was against abortion until I matured. Bushbot females have this male adoration thing, where if the males tell them to be a baby factory, they will be such and believe in and defend it totally.

Bush trying to stack the deck against women with five Catholic males on the Supreme Court, shows the whole picture. Have one token woman. It sends a message to American women. And it's not good. Know your place, and shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC