|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Reciprocity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:47 AM Original message |
Is the grand jury made up of "We the people" or "lawyer types" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
1. We the peoples, I believe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
2. Definitely "We the People" types. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
3. We the people, baby! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Reciprocity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 12:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Great article thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 12:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. it seems that all the jurors, whether or not they remained |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bmcatt (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
4. Same pool as petit jurors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demobrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
5. This jury is made up of predominantly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Reciprocity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
6. Thank you all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
7. Are you implying that lawyers aren't people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. I didn't realize that being a "lawyer type" was mutually exclusive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Reciprocity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 12:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I didn't mean it that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
12. And, it's a DC jury, not a Maryland or NOVA one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
13. A grand jury would indict a ham sandwich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC