Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

who else will be indicted?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MalachiConstant Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:52 PM
Original message
who else will be indicted?
does anybody suspect that anybody else will be indicted besides scooter and rove? what are the chances cheney himself might be indicted? it's probably a longshot that bush and/or cheney would be indicted, right? wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't know. But how useful it would be for the GOP
to see a second president from their party under extreme legal pressure in the last quarter of a century. I personally like the way History deals the GOP a Nixon and a Dubya in that relatively small time period. I also like the idea that whether they like it or not, and whether Dubya and Dick are indicted, Republicans with half a brain -- well, Republicans -- will have to re-evaluate their allegiance with regard to the actual words of the Constitution. They won't be able to just shrug this off. A spectre of accountability has already crept into the press, and if it can penetrate there, it can penetrate anyplace.

This should be a bad week for the Bush administration and goddamit it couldn't happen to a more deserving pack of liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalachiConstant Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. i sure hope so
but i guess we'll just have to wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It would NOT piss me off at all to see Condiliar indicted.
Do I have this wrong? Isn't there a list of Cabinet-level people who review the State of the Union address before it's read to Congress?

And itsn't the head of the NSA on that list? Either Rice knew the Niger claim was bullshit and let it pass anyway, or she was asleep at the switch and didn't read it.

Her job would suggest that she ought to have paid better attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It says a lot more about the judgement of the majority of
Americans who are stupid enough to fall for this bullshit every 10 years or so.

Although with the election shenanigans of 2000 and 2004 maybe they weren't that stupid this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good point. I'm fiercely hopeful that some good news could
still emerge from this Fitzgerald indictment other than a comeuppance for Republicans.

After Watergate, the Democrats did well in the elections and held on for some time. Maybe there will be a sea change of sorts this time too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. No way to tell yet. Most of what we see and hear is wishful thinking.
I don't think it's going to be much longer though. Tuesday or Wednesday will be D Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think Chump Cheney will be the surprise
I also think Libby will go down but Rove will walk. A new UN Ambassador might also be in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalachiConstant Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. i didn't realize
that bolton was involved in this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. bush won't/can't be indicted
The Office of Legal Counsel of the Justice Department has twice issued opinions, first in 1973 and again during the Clinton presidency, finding that a sitting president may not be indicted. There is no way Fitzgerald is going to disregard that opinion.

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MalachiConstant Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. ok
i knew there had to be something that would rule it out. oh, so much for wishful thinking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC