Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wm Bennett: you could abort every black baby in this country

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 12:28 AM
Original message
Wm Bennett: you could abort every black baby in this country
Was this covered last week on DU? I was away.

But if not, it is of interest and reprehensible.

William J. Bennett, author of the Book of Virtues, self confessed gambling addict. Ring familiar? Goes together like Limpbags and oxy?

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=William_J._Bennett

snip >

His moral positioning became even more questionable when he discussed abortion and crimes rates on his syndicated radio program "Morning in America," on September 28, 2005: <4>
(http://mediamatters.org/items/200509280006)


BENNETT: All right, well, I mean, I just don't know. I would not argue for the pro-life position based on this, because you don't know. I mean, it cuts both -- you know, one of the arguments in this book Freakonomics that they make is that the declining crime rate, you know, they deal with this hypothesis, that one of the reasons crime is down is that abortion is up. Well --

CALLER: Well, I don't think that statistic is accurate.

BENNETT: Well, I don't think it is either, I don't think it is either, because first of all, there is just too much that you don't know. But I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could -- if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down. So these far-out, these far-reaching, extensive extrapolations are, I think, tricky< snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, it's been covered. What I don't know

is whether anyone has pointed out that aborting all MALE babies would be an even more effective way of reducing crime.

Lest I seem like a female chauvinist, let me add that I like men -- in general, I like them better than women -- but it's a fact that having a Y chromosome is highly correlated with criminal behavior. However, eliminating boys and men is a lousy way to reduce crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He meant reducing black babies- but it's "tricky"
after all.

Did you see this with Bennett's paw prints on it?

Amazing what you can infd on the net. and this was written in 1998!

http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm

snip >>January 26, 1998



The Honorable William J. Clinton
President of the United States
Washington, DC


Dear Mr. President:

We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding, and that we may soon face a threat in the Middle East more serious than any we have known since the end of the Cold War. In your upcoming State of the Union Address, you have an opportunity to chart a clear and determined course for meeting this threat. We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world. That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime from power. We stand ready to offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor...

Such uncertainty will, by itself, have a seriously destabilizing effect on the entire Middle East. It hardly needs to be added that if Saddam does acquire the capability to deliver weapons of mass destruction, as he is almost certain to do if we continue along the present course, the safety of American troops in the region, of our friends and allies like Israel and the moderate Arab states, and a significant portion of the world’s supply of oil will all be put at hazard. As you have rightly declared, Mr. President, the security of the world in the first part of the 21st century will be determined largely by how we handle this threat.

Abrams Richard L. Armitage William J. Bennett

Jeffrey Bergner John Bolton Paula Dobriansky

Francis Fukuyama Robert Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad

William Kristol Richard Perle Peter W. Rodman

Donald Rumsfeld William Schneider, Jr. Vin Weber

Paul Wolfowitz R. James Woolsey Robert B. Zoellick << snip



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes, I've seen it. Early period PNAC. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. How about aborting ALL babies to ELIMINATE crime?
Sounds like a plan to me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. How does this puke get away with this?
how can anyone even speak such trash?

even speculatively, on the air?

I wonder if Clintons failure to respond to the PNAC was their reason for the Ken Starrfarce?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
really annoyed Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yes
This topic was gone over several times... And even more shocking, some people here at DU agreed with the idea he was spouting. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC