Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The way it was when voting worked

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:41 AM
Original message
The way it was when voting worked
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 01:46 AM by kster

Nobody pretends that democracy is perfect or at all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.
Winston Churchill

November 11, 1947

Prof. Douglas Jones of the University of Iowa computer department presents a very nice Brief Illustrated History of Voting for those who would like additional background.

Not too long ago we had a nice, simple election system and it worked. Citizens went to the county clerk's office in person, proved they lived at a particular location and were citizens of the state and the United States, and registered to vote. The county clerk then duly entered their name in a precinct poll book.

On election day good citizens went to their local precinct, again in person. When their names and addresses matched what citizen election judges had marked in the poll book, they were given a paper ballot that contained only the races and candidates applicable to that precinct and only local issues that the citizen was eligible to vote on based on where they lived. For example, county residents did not get to vote on issues or candidates for a city election.

In a private booth the good citizen marked his or her paper ballot in secret, free from any intimidation or observation by anyone as thousands of years of experience had taught us was necessary for a democratic election.

When the citizen finished marking the ballot by hand, any stub or other means of identifying the ballot needed by the county clerk for tracking ballots, was removed by an election judge without looking at the ballot, which was usually covered by a secrecy sleeve or folded. Blind or infirm citizens were helped to vote by citizen election judges to the extent necessary.



http://www.ejfi.org/Voting/Voting-73.htm#way

All we have to do is keep fighting for it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great post. I'll keep fighting for a fair vote. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Where did you find this. It's great. I love new stuff (well stuff I have
not seen yet). I don't agree with all of his points but the main points are the KEY points: paper, paper, paper -- citizen counts, witnessed, no machines at all, no outsourcing. Keep it simple.

I would like to see a Holiday or three day voting period, incorporating a weekend. Maybe Sun, Mon, Tue, something like that. I do like exit polls and I don't think they're faked. But other than that, he has the key point, verified voter paper ballots AND THAT'S ALL!

NO MACHINES. NO WEIRD CORPORATION DOING THE WORK. NO NOTHING BETWEEN THE VOTER AND THE VOTE AND THE VOTE AND THE VOTE COUNT...EXCEPT CITIZENS BEING WATCHED BY OTHER CITIZENS.

:kick::dem::kick: Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No more "counting ballots in secret"
people counting ballots, its the only way to take the country back. anything else is just a sham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I agree Autorank and the 3 day voting period is a really good
idea IMHO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick: A must read!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Canadians have systems and checks that we should emulate
Such as non-partisan election commissions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC