Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Koppel on now, suggesting that the Dem "establishment" has seized control

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:13 AM
Original message
Koppel on now, suggesting that the Dem "establishment" has seized control
Edited on Wed Jan-28-04 12:15 AM by Dover
and taken it away from outsider Dean. He was saying that the insiders have worked really hard to bump Dean out and now are piling onto the Kerry bandwagon and expect to ride it to the end.

I hadn't heard the media folks talk about Kerry as the establishment before....outloud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Koppel would know.
Glad someone in the media is saying it, but is it too late now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Koppel is telling the truth, the DLC is winning!
And Al From got his candidate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Did Koppel tell the truth about faked WMD evidence, before the war?
Ah- but now he is the crusading truthteller since he is going after powerful Democrats...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. LOL
well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. "going after powerful Democrats..."?
You couldn't be speaking of Kerry since he is a wimp and a Bush enabler when he cowardly voted for PATRIOT and for the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #19
36. You can't do any better than name-calling
Calling Kerry a "wimp" is not an argument. It's the same sort of childish name-calling the Repukes engage in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
70. "Establishment" ="powerful". Ted implied "powerful", not me.
But you got to smear a Democrat anyway, even if you could not actually counter my statement- and thats what counts!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Printer70 Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. Al From and the Establishment prevailed
Progressives once more were told how much their vote means to the Party. It's never been more clear that there are a set of puppet masters who puppeteer both parties. "People Power" couldn't match up to the veritable armada of DLC/corporate money, opposition research, and media contacts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #24
49. Terry MacAuliffe is smiling somewhere today
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Not too late.
This thing is just getting started. California doesn't weigh in until March 3rd and Clark is very popular here. Kerry's bandwagon is going to lose some steam starting next week - despite what the media whores would have us believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetempe Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. WOW! He actually said that?
Guess he didn't get the memo not to talk about how party insiders and the whore media are manipulating the whole process until after Kerry is nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting
Someone in the media is talking about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. The establishment is stupid.
If they make the ticket pro-war, inside the belt-way politicians who failed to stand up to Bush they will lose. Based on their track record to date I really think the party needs some new strategists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. That how I see it.
Support Dean and Clark for a democratic renewal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. I wonder how many votes the "establishment" gets to cast?
What percentage of their precints is reporting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. How could they lose?
No matter who wins in November, the man taking the oath of office in January is going to be a Skull & Bones cult member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
37. Why won't you answer the question, IC?
Could it be the answer to the question is "none"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. How Many Votes Does "Money" Cast?
and yet it decides most elections.

Actually, the "establishment" has quite a few votes at the convention in the form of superdelegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
38. Untrue
Clinton was outspent by the Repukes, and he won twice. Gore was outspent by Bush*, and Gore also won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bandwagon to be torpedoed by Gulf War I issue
Dean and Clark should nail Kerry on this before Bush nails the Democrats (and the world).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. Newsflash: The establishment was backing Dean only a week ago
Dean still has more superdelegates than anyone. And he had all the big name endorsements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Baloney
Al Gore crossed the line into populism in 2000, and the party power-brokers abandoned him.

He has been on the outside ever since, in case you didn't notice.

The rest can be chalked up to persuasion: Dean attacked corrupt Washington insiders, and the more sane Democrats sided with him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
42. I guess those super-delegates Dean has amassed
are not "Washington insiders"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. They have temporarily
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. I think he should be on Crossfire..
and on the right is Ted Koppel and Ed Koch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abigail147 Donating Member (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
65. Bite me Carville and Begala.
Carville neutered by Maitlin and domesticity and Begala pretty sure he is a kingmaker. Oh wait, who is the liberal viewpoint on Capital Report --Larry something? All Demo establishment reps openly pulling for Kerry and openly disdainful of Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. Kucinich is the only Real Democrat in this race.
You are kidding yourselves about the other guys being very far from the DLC neo liberal corporate globalist right of center point.

Granted any Democrat will be better than the bull goose looney neo con conquer the world's oil fields so our cronies can wring the last penny of profit from a dying petro culture BFEE crowd, but it will be only a brief respite before living in denial about Peak Oil will wipe out all but the super rich.

Only Kucinich has the guts to tell the truth, its just that everyone is too terrified to hear it. If we had listened to Carter 30 years ago and got serious about sustainable energy then, we might have had a chance, but we were to scared, greedy and lazy to deal with it then and nothing has changed in the national character since, except that we are even more greedy and lazy. So we live in denial and play the little politico game, thinking that someone as deep inside as Kerry, Clark, Edwards or even Dean will create adequately substantive change.

Smell the coffee. . .

<http://www.peakoil.net/>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Except for Clark, Dean, Kerry, Edwards, & Sharpton. They're real Dems, too
Oh, and Lieberman. He's also a real Democrat.

By the way, I love the smell of coffee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #31
45. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Small tent Democrat, eh,
Edited on Wed Jan-28-04 11:07 AM by DenverDem
so explain to me how exporting all the jobs in America and destroying the world economy for the profit of global corporations is a Democrat position.

Sustainable economy is a "small hole"?!?! Neo liberalism is a Democrat Party plank?

My position is that until we as Americans start honestly assessing the global economy and our impact on it and the impending catastrophic Energy Crash and our impact on it, we are just playing semantic games and living in denial about reality.

If that position is insulting to Democrats then I have severely misjudged the Democrat Party. It is you, sir, who have a limited view of this forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. The Problem With Your Thesis, Sir, Is Simple
Rep. Kucinich received about one percent of the vote in the primary. This would seem to indicate that ninety-nine percent of Democratic voters in New Hampshire are not real Democrats, were your view to be taken seriously. Rep. Kucinich has been roundly rejected by the rank and file of the Democratic Party as a candidate for President; he would fare as poorly, if not worse, in the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. My point, exactly, "electability" is king.
the issues have been framed by the media and right of centrists to say that sustainable economic policies are "unelectable" positions. We have demonized reality based economic discourse and live in denial about the realities we are creating with globalism, because they would require us to seriously asses our urealistically comfortable lifestyles. Until we have the guts to face reality we are "the problem" ongoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. So potential DK supporters are swayed by the electability argument?
If these people are fooled by the media on economic policies, what makes you think they would be smart enough to understand DK's positions? If these people "live in denial about the realities we are creating with globalism" why would they vote for DK, a candidate that is opposed to globalism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #53
56. They don't even get to consider his policies
because he is marginalized by the media and other candidates and not given a realistic forum, so there is no substantive dialectic on these issues.

I wish I could continue this discussion now, but I have to catch a plane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. Listen to yourself
Democrats "don't even get to consider" DK's policies, but DK's policies are the ones that are "real Democrat" policies.

That leads to the conclusion that most Democrats are not "real Democrats" and that DK, who represents a small minority of Democrats is the real Democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #50
59. You Speak Of Electability, Mr. Denver, As If It Were A Bad Thing
Edited on Wed Jan-28-04 11:36 AM by The Magistrate
It is, of course, the essential consideration: the point of political campaigns is not to make the participants on one side feel good about themselves, but to defeat the other side, and this cannot be achieved if the candidate is a mere fringe figure, better suited to a splinter faction than a serious party.

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #47
51. True, but
DK is right so DK must obviously hold the "real Democratic" position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. DK is the only candidate proposing substantive change
which would be an actual opposition to Republican economic policy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. So what?
No one is disputing that here, so why bring it up? The argument made was that DK is the "real" Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. My point being unless you propose change
you are status quo supporting Republican lite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. Silly
In a two-party system, it's ridiculous to think of one of the parties as supporting fundamental change.

Both parties support the current system and want nothing more than to tinker with it. By calling for drastic change in the system, DK distinguishes himself from the rest of the Democratic Party because, simply put, the Democratic Party is NOT about drastic change to the system.

As I said before, your arguement is "DK is right, so therefore he's the "real" Democrat"

Nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #57
66. "In a two-party system, it's ridiculous
to think of one of the parties as supporting fundamental change."

So what's the point then. We're just jacking off. Money, looks, charm, venality, prevarication and viciousness rule the day, and where politics is concerned, always shall.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. Thanx GA
you get my drift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edge Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Kucinich, Dean, and Edwards.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Is "Real Democrat" a code word for socialist?
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. Is addressing the impending Energy Crash socialist?
Your use of the flashpoint terminology indicts your far right position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #29
61. Actually, yes
Capitalism has no cure for the impending Energy Crash
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #61
68. So supporting capitalism is suicidal?
And that is superior to dealing with the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #22
60. yup
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. true words
Edited on Wed Jan-28-04 01:14 AM by GreenArrow
which few wish to hear. No one who is not pro status quo is going to be elected.

Kucinich is the candidate most concerned with "democratic" principles as opposed to "Democratic" party principles, which at this point in time, have largely evolved into a thinly disguised corporatism. The former category is larger and considerably more all encompassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. Right. So Could You Begin to Take a Guess
Why people like Carville and Begala are calling for Dean, who appears to be a strong second like Edwards, to step down from the race, but are fine with Kucinich, who's managed to draw *how many delegates*, staying in?

I'll tell you why: The DLC/DNC wants Kucinich to stay in and let his campaign people attack Dean from the left, insuring that Kerry won't have to. Because if Kerry attacks Dean from the left, he starts looking a little *different* to the moderate Dems who think he looks "more electable" than Dean, the wild-eyed liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #35
64. Bingo!
But people will continue to be fooled and then wonder why we lose in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainbows Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
41. Bingo .. Right on target ... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Printer70 Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
21. He is right- Progressives have been sidelined by DLC/establishment
This is not a positive harbinger for the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
26. He's right. Same old crap.
Edited on Wed Jan-28-04 01:11 AM by milkyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
27. It's the media that have bumped Dean.
And the Dem establishment doesn't seem to have much influence on the media whoredom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
28. One mustn't forget that the media is also the "establishment".
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
30. That's what it seems like to me, too
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
32. Interesting
Surprised he would admit that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
33. Koppel's right for once. The DLC is a cancer on the Democratic party.
And it's about time the tumor got cut out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
34. And the people can be herded into toddling along behind
everytime.

ABB! ABB! ABB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
39. If the DLC is so powerful
how come they're not getting the quick primary decision they were planning on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
40. Naturally, that is what they want people to think but......
The race has only started - if we look at the number of delegates needed to get the nomination. If they all drop out, then Kerry wins by default. However, I don't think that is going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
43. I wish people would quite fiddling with this race and let the voters vote!
:nuke: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
44. And this is a surprise because?
Well, at least we now have a three party system...

Repuke
Repuke-Lite
Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
48. yup
They've pulling in favors for weeks. They are going to kill us in november just like they did in 2002. They would rather lose with a coporate corrupted Democrat than win with someone like Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
62. For a non-establishment candidate
Edited on Wed Jan-28-04 12:01 PM by Lydia Leftcoast
Dean sure has picked up some establishment endorsements, including not only Al Gore, but also Tom Harkin, Lowell Weicker, Bill Bradley, Ann Richards, the late Senator Paul Simon, and more Housecritters and local officials than I care to count.

You don't get superdelegates if no one in the the establishment likes you. In fact, given that Dean has the lead in delegates, despite coming in 3rd in Iowa and 2nd in New Hampshire, the establishment seems to like Dean better than the voters do.

Edited for sentence structure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
63. Koppel's right. Chalk another one up for the appeasement wing.
Too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
69. Bush/Rove/Koppel want Dean to win
The Bush news media will lie about everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
71. Gore, Harkin, Bradley, Cummings...
They've worked really hard to bump Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC