Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FEMA stacked with Bush cronies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:31 PM
Original message
FEMA stacked with Bush cronies
WPhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/08/AR2005090802165.html?referrer=email

Inside FEMA
Leaders Lacking Disaster Experience
'Brain Drain' At Agency Cited

By Spencer S. Hsu
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 9, 2005

Five of eight top Federal Emergency Management Agency officials came to their posts with virtually no experience in handling disasters and now lead an agency whose ranks of seasoned crisis managers have thinned dramatically since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

FEMA's top three leaders -- Director Michael D. Brown, Chief of Staff Patrick J. Rhode and Deputy Chief of Staff Brooks D. Altshuler -- arrived with ties to President Bush's 2000 campaign or to the White House advance operation, according to the agency. Two other senior operational jobs are filled by a former Republican lieutenant governor of Nebraska and a U.S. Chamber of Commerce official who was once a political operative.

Meanwhile, veterans such as U.S. hurricane specialist Eric Tolbert and World Trade Center disaster managers Laurence W. Zensinger and Bruce P. Baughman -- who led FEMA's offices of response, recovery and preparedness, respectively -- have left since 2003, taking jobs as consultants or state emergency managers, according to current and former officials.

Because of the turnover, three of the five FEMA chiefs for natural-disaster-related operations and nine of 10 regional directors are working in an acting capacity, agency officials said.

Patronage appointments to the crisis-response agency are nothing new to Washington administrations. But inexperience in FEMA's top ranks is emerging as a key concern of local, state and federal leaders as investigators begin to sift through what the government has admitted was a bungled response to Hurricane Katrina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. No surprises there ...
It has become abundantly clear that no one in a leadership role at FEMA has a clue how to respond to a disaster appropriately or efficiently.

The article certainly spells it out. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Randypiper Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. They do have a clue how to respond
Michael Brown, the embattled head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, approved payments in excess of $31 million in taxpayer money to thousands of Florida residents who were unaffected by Hurricane Frances and three other hurricanes last year in an effort to help President Bush win a majority of votes in that state during his reelection campaign, according to published reports.

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Sept05/Leopold0910.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "appropriately or efficiently"
I had no doubt that Brown et al could/would respond inappropriately ... "appropriately or efficiently" are important qualifiers.

The response to the horrendous aftermath of Katrina is criminal, immoral ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. "you're doin' a heck of a job brownie"
:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, George was largely a ceremonial Governor pre-2000
He had zero administrative and leadership experience.

But, um, Jesus loves him this I know. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. he still is ceremonial n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Experienced personnel at FEMA left because of
frustration with the way * was dismantling the agency. What we keep hearing now during the "March of the Excusers" is how "experience isn't needed because * cronies know how to lead." Which they don't. They only know how to kiss ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is the same circumstance in almost every Fed agency
since Shrub's policy of rewarding your $$ funders with jobs they have absolutely no qualifications to do!

I've watched some of the "directors" testify before congress on cspan. The most obvious to me is Elaine Chou (sp). EVERY question asked of her, she referred to her assistant! It was a disgrace!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. yeah, but...
stick them where they can't hurt anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. duh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC