Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Destroying FEMA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 10:57 AM
Original message
Destroying FEMA
Edited on Thu Sep-08-05 11:05 AM by melissinha
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/29/AR2005082901445.html

Indeed, the advent of the Bush administration in January 2001 signaled the beginning of the end for FEMA. The newly appointed leadership of the agency showed little interest in its work or in the missions pursued by the departed Witt. Then came the Sept. 11 attacks and the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. Soon FEMA was being absorbed into the "homeland security borg."

This year it was announced that FEMA is to "officially" lose the disaster preparedness function that it has had since its creation. The move is a death blow to an agency that was already on life support. In fact, FEMA employees have been directed not to become involved in disaster preparedness functions, since a new directorate (yet to be established) will have that mission.

To be sure, America may well be hit by another major terrorist attack, and we must be prepared for such an event. But I can guarantee you that hurricanes like the one that ripped into Louisiana and Mississippi yesterday, along with tornadoes, earthquakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, floods, windstorms, mudslides, power outages, fires and perhaps a pandemic flu will have to be dealt with on a weekly and daily basis throughout this country. They are coming for sure, sooner or later, even as we are, to an unconscionable degree, weakening our ability to respond to them.


According to George Haddow Deputy Chief of Staff under James Lee Witt who was head of FEMA during hte Clinton Administration, he told Rachel Maddow last night on teh Majority Report that (this is me paraphrasing) "FEMA was targeted because it was concerded an entitlement program". Here's a quote from May 15, 2001, appearance before a Senate appropriations subcommittee, Bush's FEMA Director Allbaugh signaled that the new, stripped-down approach would be applied at FEMA as well. "Many are concerned that federal disaster assistance may have evolved into both an oversized entitlement program and a disincentive to effective state and local risk management," he said.
this quote is from which includes the actions that should have been taken :
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_09/007020.php

What I understood from this is that $20 million given to FEMA is like giving money away to programs like Welfare and Medicaid. They are lumping in a preparedness and mitigation for emergencies agency with social programs... and all you have to do is say entitled and POOF! no more preparedness! So it really floors me that Chertoff wanted this very September to be Preparedness Month (second annual) when he is in fact dismantling a program of preparedness. I think that the dismantling of FEMA is key to our indictment of this criminals... I would like to learn more about it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. ...I would like to learn more also. I know it was put under
Homeland Security and the rationalization was that it would INCREASE preparedness. (and we've seen this week how well THAT worked). I've also read complaints from various people involved that the focus of FEMA turned almost exclusively to terrorism.

Perhaps its time to dismantle Homeland Security instead (...and let's throw in the Patriot Act for good measure).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Its a democrat thing, I guess
We prefer prevention and mitigation to reactionary tactics.

Wonder what forum discussion of FEMA is under here on DU , not much going on in the DHS forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Right now, it might be a good idea to have a FEMA forum...and maybe a
Katrina forum too, although that's what this one has in many ways become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. interesting related info on Franken
Edited on Thu Sep-08-05 12:12 PM by melissinha
Franken just spoke with COngressman Dingell of Michigan. Katherine asked the Congressman why the 2004 Florida Hurricane was handled correctly if this Agency is in such shambles?

HE responded that the differences were:
Garden variety hurricane
Governor is brother of President
Upcoming election in which FLorida would be a deciding factor

They also pointed out that FEMA funds were given to Miami when Miami had not been struck... So essentially FEMA was being used to curry favor for the President from the hurricane victims and the state as a whole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Keith Olberman got into that a bit too. Its shameful. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. duplicate post
Edited on Thu Sep-08-05 11:36 AM by melissinha
duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC