Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cleland: ‘Bush’s Iraq Plan For Victory is Not Working

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 01:23 PM
Original message
Cleland: ‘Bush’s Iraq Plan For Victory is Not Working
Bush to Begin 5 Day “Stay the Course” Tour, Max Cleland: ‘Bush’s Iraq Plan For Victory is Not Working’
August 20th, 2005

As George W. Bush prepares to begin a five-day push to “tell Americans why he thinks U.S. troops must continue the fight in Iraq,” former Senator Max Cleland of Georgia delivered the Democratic Radio Address this morning.

Bush, challenged but not bowed by the protestors who continue the vigil outside of his Texas ranch in Cindy Sheehan’s stead, once again invoked “the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in his radio address” today. It has been proven that there is no direct connection between 9/11 and the Iraq war, but that still does not stop Bush from continuing to attempt to invoke fear into Americans.



The Democratic Radio Address — Max Cleland: ‘Bush’s Iraq Plan For Victory is Not Working’

“Good morning. I’m former Senator Max Cleland.

“My fellow Americans. My friends. I’m a veteran of the Vietnam War. Having left three limbs on that battlefield, I’ve seen the toll that war can take on our troops and on our country. We are now engaged in another war — a war in Iraq. However, the Bush Administration’s plan for victory is not working.

MORE & LINKS - http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=293
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. There is no plan for victory, only for occupation at the expense
of small town american sons and daughters and Iraqi's starved into corruption. Its all a farce, from start to finish, its one lie after another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Great speech from Cleland!
He nails it and Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. What can Max mean?
Bush proclaimed victory on the aircraft carrier, I seem to recall.

Oh ye of little faith. What we have been witnesssing all this time is just a bunch of disaffected Baathist dead-enders firing catapults and pea-shooters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Um, don't decent people WANT it to NOT work?
I mean, it's only war crimes and transnational theft and privatization (piratization) of Iraqi resources, but maybe we don't want that 'strategy' to succeed?

It really bothers me when even good Dems like Cleland criticize 'the plan not working', 'not achieving success', 'not completing the mission'. Excuse me, but the 'mission' is FUCKING ILLEGAL, people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kerry: What we need is an "intelligent design" for the Iraq policy.
Cleland and Kerry are still swinging away at Bush. I wish the 24/7 news services would cover their remarks more indepth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. They'd need to turn up missing for the MSM to cover anything they say....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Kerry has been getting a lot of coverage recently
Too bad the MSM didn't pay attention months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. It was designed for failure
and now we're witnessing the effects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. WTF does victory mean when it is an illegal occupation to steal oil???
Is victory that we steal all their oil? What is he talking about??? THIS is why most people think Democrats don't make any sense....they don't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. When Iraq is subdued and another Colony of Amerika...
the Bush Regime will declare Victory.

The Hand-Over That Wasn't: Illegal Orders give the US a Lock on Iraq's Economy
by Antonia Juhasz

Officially, the U.S. occupation of Iraq ended on June 28, 2004. But in reality, the United States is still in charge: Not only do 138,000 troops remain to control the streets, but the "100 Orders" of L. Paul Bremer III remain to control the economy.

These little noticed orders enacted by Bremer, the now-departed head of the now-defunct Coalition Provisional Authority, go to the heart of Bush administration plans in Iraq. They lock in sweeping advantages to American firms, ensuring long-term U.S. economic advantage while guaranteeing few, if any, benefits to the Iraqi people.

The Bremer orders control every aspect of Iraqi life - from the use of car horns to the privatization of state-owned enterprises. Order No. 39 alone does no less than "transition from a … centrally planned economy to a market economy" virtually overnight and by U.S. fiat.

Although many thought that the "end" of the occupation would also mean the end of the orders, on his last day in Iraq Bremer simply transferred authority for the orders to Prime Minister Iyad Allawi - a 30-year exile with close ties to the CIA and British intelligence.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0805-07.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Goes along with every other "plan" he's had since 2000
Thank GOD even the most dense,stupid,flaming RW'ers saw through his SS reform sham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yojon Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. well the plan *for victory* isnt working but that doesnt mean
there isn't a plan.

Remember those old quiz shows on teevee when you won the prize and got a 10 minute 'shopping spree' in the department store? You got to keep everything you could stuff into a basket in 10 minutes.

Cheney's *plan* is to prolong the shopping spree as long as possible. Each new non-bid contract or Lockheed-Martin VP going into the DOD raises these bastards' bank account balance by another order of magnitude.

It is incorrect to say that there is no plan.

The plan is to loot, pillage and rake off for as long as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Halliburton and Carlyle Group would disagree with him
For them and all the oil men in the Administration it is working perfectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. That's true...
Haliburton supports the machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC