Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I just have to post this, it's all Clintons fault LOL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
domlaw Donating Member (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:42 AM
Original message
I just have to post this, it's all Clintons fault LOL
While doing my morning troll across the lunatic fringes of the far radical right, I came across this post. You see now Iraq is Clinton's fault, oh yes it has gotten that bad. Wait for the, if it wasn't for Clinton meme coming to a blog near you.



*** Cindy Sheehan is standing in front of the wrong house **

Think about this.

1. Cindy Sheehan lost her son in Iraq, and yes, she might be expected to lash out in anger.

2. We are in Iraq largely because of the events on 9/11.

3. If 9/11 doesn't happen, do we even go into Iraq? Absolutely not.

4. 9/11 could have been prevented. We knew all about the risks presented by at least four of the hijackers, including the cell leader Mohammad Atta.

5. 9/11 did happen because Jamie Gorelick, under the direction of Bill Clinton, erected the "wall" that prevented vital information about these four hijackers from reaching the F.B.I.

Cindy Sheehan, along with the rest of the useless MSM, needs to connect the dots and maybe they will see what a normal reasonable person would see... that the dots lead directly to Bill Clinton and Jamie Gorelick.

Cindy, if you want to talk to your son's killers, the ones who precipitated the series of events that eventually let do your son's demise, you need to head to upstate New York, here's the address for you: 15 Old House Lane, Chappaqua NY 10514.


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1461942/posts
(Don't click the link it's vomit inducing)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cdb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. I knew it was Clintons fault, I just knew it!!
Anything can be blamed on Clinton, because after all, he lied about a blowjob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. THE CLENIS IS ALL-POWERFUL!!!!! FEAR THE CLENIS!!!!!
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Actually, freep, it IS Clinton's fault for not allowing the high crimes
committed by Poppy Bush and his international financier cronies to be revealed when he had the chance to open the books on BCCI.

BCCI was the first organized network of arms dealers, drug dealers, money launderers and the terrorists who were funded by them, and their financial industry cronies.

Poppy Bush fought the disclosures for FIVE YEARS - protecting terrorists and their funders.

George W. Bush was making million dollar deals with the terrorist bank and Salem Bin Laden while John Kerry was working to shut it down and track the terrorist funds.

Yep - Clinton was guilty - of not revealing to the world the extent of criminality of GHWBush and his entire administration that fostered terrorism globally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. US Media fails to say "wall" re Atta info is a Reagan/Bush/Bush Wall
US Media fails to say "wall" re Atta info is a Reagan/Bush/Bush Wall
http://mediamatters.org/items/200508110001

http://mediamatters.org/static/audio/limbaugh-200508110001.mp3

Limbaugh falsely blamed Clinton administration for "wall" that purportedly prevented intelligence sharing about 9-11 hijackers
Listen to this audio clip On the August 9 and 10 broadcasts of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh falsely accused the Clinton administration of enacting a policy that prevented the Pentagon from sharing intelligence -- one year before the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York and the Pentagon -- about lead 9-11 hijacker Mohammed Atta. In fact, the policy, often referred to as a "wall," was established well before Clinton took office http://mediamatters.org/items/200405200005#20050811 and was retained by the Bush administration; it is unclear whether the "wall" played any role in the decision to withhold information about Atta.

Criticizing a New York Times article http://mediamatters.org/rd?http://mediamatters.org/rd?

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/09/politics/09intel.html?ei=5090&en=bc4d02afa0a46012&ex=1281240000&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print for "hid(ing)" the reason for withholding information about Atta, Limbaugh asserted on August 9 that former Clinton deputy attorney general Jamie Gorelick was responsible for creating the "wall" that restricted information sharing between intelligence and law enforcement agencies prior to the September 11 attacks and that the "wall" prevented the Pentagon intelligence operation Able Danger from disclosing to the FBI or CIA the Al Qaeda connections of Atta and three other future hijackers. Limbaugh repeated the claim on August 10: "They couldn't forward the information to law enforcement because there was a wall which prevented them from doing so, erected by Jamie Gorelick, who ran the Justice Department while Janet Reno was the face of that department."

But the joint House and Senate intelligence committees' report of pre-September 11 intelligence failures did not find that the "wall" originated in the Clinton administration; the report states http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/24jul20031400/www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/creports/pdf/fullreport_errata.pdf#page=415 : "The 'wall' is not a single barrier, but a series of restrictions between and within agencies constructed over 60 years as a result of legal, policy, institutional and personal factors." Similarly, a ruling by the top-secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review -- when it met for the first time in 2002 -- traces the origin of the "wall" to "some point during the 1980s. http://mediamatters.org/rd?http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fisa/fiscr111802.html

Nor did enforcement of the "wall" end with the Clinton administration. In his April 12, 2004, testimony before the 9-11 Commission, then-Attorney General John Ashcroft conceded http://mediamatters.org/rd?http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9088-2004Apr13.html that his own deputy attorney general, Larry Thompson, reauthorized the "wall" in August 2001.


<snip>

anyone wanting to contact Rush the liar: rush@eibnet.com


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. I like how there's no human beings making decisions to invade Iraq
We go to war in Iraq "largely" because of 9/11 is true: if not for 9/11, what would George Bush have lied about? Lying about a connectino between Iraq and a hot summer doesn't do it. He had to lie about a connection between Iraq and something big.

But no freeper puts Bush's free will into the causation, because then he might be given blame. No, BUsh is just an automaton, controlled by events beyond his control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
domlaw Donating Member (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes Sir
It's the line:

"they will see what a normal reasonable person would see... that the dots lead directly to Bill Clinton and Jamie Gorelick."

That really gets me, what sort of normal and reasonable person would even give this crap the time of day?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC