Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pro-Republican spin on Ohio election on my CT radio - Schmidt first woman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:32 AM
Original message
Pro-Republican spin on Ohio election on my CT radio - Schmidt first woman
This is WTIC AM 1080 in Hartford, CT - a 50,000 Watt station. To summarize - they said it was hotly contested and that Iraq War Vet Paul Hackett lost to Jean Schmidt, who now becomes the first woman to ever hold a seat in that district. Result was seen as a referendum on the Iraq War and that Hackett had been critical of Bush. Nothing about how it was a heavily Republican district - just seemed to emphasize that she was the first woman ever to represent the district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Referendum on the Iraq War? Fine. Bring it on.
She won 52% of the vote in a rock solid Republican district. Then that should tell us that if only 52% of voters in a solidly Republican district voted for the pro-war candidate then just maybe a majority of Americans no longer support the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't think it was about the war for a lot of them
You can chalk a good chunk of her support to fetus worship and fear of Adam and Steve hitching up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I agree. The war is being fought by the poor and financed by the furure.
There is almost no sense over here of us being at war. And notice Bush talks less and less about being a "war president".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. My point was...
that they completely ignored that it was a heavily Republican district! That was how my local station spun it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That is being played down everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC