Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Psst. Are We Supposed To Forget The "War On Terror?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 04:43 PM
Original message
Psst. Are We Supposed To Forget The "War On Terror?"
Not only is the administration not using the term "war on terror" anymore -- apparently, they don't want to discuss it much either.

In today's weekly radio address, here was the extent of President Bush's comment on terrorism:

"We're also spreading freedom, because free countries are peaceful. And we're staying on the offensive against the terrorists, fighting them abroad so we do not have to face them here at home."

I would have expected more, given that we are barely a week removed from a terrorist attack in Egypt, and a second failed effort to attack London's mass tranist system.

***

Earlier this week, the Bush Administration began using the phrasing "global struggle against violent extremism" -- forming the Orwellian (or possibly Christian fundamentalist) acronym Global SAVE -- instead of "war on terror."

The solution is "more diplomatic, more economic, more political than it is military," Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the National Press Club.

I think there's a more practical reason, though. The U.S. can lose a war, which has a beginning, middle and end. It's harder to pinpoint losing a global struggle against violent extremism -- which seemingly can last generations.

Vietnam, you might remember, was not legally a "war" but a conflict.

***

But whatever the administration wants to call our fight against terrorism, it amazes me that Bush didn't speak about it more in this morning's address, given the news of the last several hours from London and Rome.

Certainly, it is a positive that Scotland Yard tracked down and seized the three remaining suspects from the failed July 21 effort to launch a second round of London mass transit terror attacks. Elsewhere in London, Scotland Yard rounded up several other suspects related to the recent terrorist attacks in the city.

Or, Bush could have spoken about Sheik Mohammed Ali Hassan al-Moayad, sentenced Friday to 75 years after a New York jury found him guilty of conspiring to support and attempting to support Al Qaeda and the Palestinian extremist group Hamas. He also was convicted of actually supporting Hamas but acquitted of supporting Al Qaeda.

***

The news of the past few days is just a small piece in the larger fight against terrorism. And maybe the White House is afraid that by discussing a few successes -- especially another country's successes -- that it will lead to discussion of all of our country's failures, most notably its failure to capture Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.

I don't know if that's the reason. But, given that we are not far removed from the terror attacks in London and the Egyptian seaside -- both possibly tied to Al Qaeda, or splinter groups -- I think Americans should expect more than two empty sentences from their president.

***

This article first appeared at Journalists Against Bush's B.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it's now
the "Struggle Against Exremism", not the "War on Terror".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I know
Read the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mitt Chovick Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. It's easier to lose a "struggle" than a war.
Pitiful.

Next thing it will be downgraded to a "conflict" than perhaps "troubles"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. George doesn't need to be a war president anymore
So, we no longer call it a war. Well, actually, it never really WAS a war. In fact, the Republicans have never called this struggle a war, that's a Democrat gloss. Every time you call it a war, the terrorists gain a little in the struggle. Why do you hate America so much that you want it to be in a war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. If it's a struggle, there's no War Crimes
capiche?
There will however, be struggle profiteering and the struggle for oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. They know Americans have a limited capacity for sustained warfare
This is a way of reframing what is being done in a Cold War struggle kind of way. And yes, the purpose is to make us forget that there is a war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Shhhh... it's a secret. Repeat it over and over and they'll never notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. What a photo
Is that from London?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. My photo of Cindy Sheehan?
It's from the Downing Street Memo hearings when the repukes forced the Democrats into the basement but still couldn't silence us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. what an expression
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neweurope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Free countries are peaceful." *giggles* Aren't you the Land of the Free?
Edited on Sat Jul-30-05 05:13 PM by neweurope


--------------

Remember Fallujah

Bush to The Hague!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. if it's a struggle
then what are military troops doing in Afghanistan?
what are military troops doing in Iraq?

Since 9-11 and bush* declaring a War on Terra --- I've been telling people you can't fight terra using a "war" model. You don't go after a hornet's nest with a sledge hammer.

"terra" is the tool, just like a gun is a tool -- it's the person/people holding the tool you have to worry about and deal with....

do I think bush* is on the right track with this Global Struggle against Violent extremism?

perhaps, but I question his motives in the sudden flip-flop from his Yee-haawwism -- I suspect his polling numbers being in the toilet, and perhaps a growing undercurrent of discontent amongst repugs have more to do with it than a sudden realization that this is a struggle as opposed to a war. And that has me even more worried
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Nah, it's because...
There ain't no such thing as struggle crimes.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC