Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Bush's Security Clearance be revoked?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:07 PM
Original message
Should Bush's Security Clearance be revoked?
I've read the latest Rove trash, gotten steamed and angry, and carefully considered what the consequences SHOULD be.

Bush himself, who NOW KNOWS that Rove and others in his administration have been involved in serious leaks of classified information (he can no longer claim ignorance since the story has been leaked all over the press, most likely by the White House itself), is doing nothing to prevent the continued leak of classified information. This is a violation of HIS OWN SECURITY CLEARANCE and subjects him to legal action under the law. We are watching willful violation of national security at the highest levels.

Should we push to have Bush's security clearance revoked until a full blown investigation of mis-handling of classified information in the White House can be conducted and reforms implemented?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joey Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes - Bush should lose his security clearance
Most people with Bush's arrest record would not qualify for a clearance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. They never tell him anything.....
he's on the floor playing with his little plastic "Army Men" while the grown-ups do all, I hate to say it, but, thinking. In my opinion there is very little thought going into the bush agenda, except how to steal the Treasury bare. THAT they think about quite often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. No!!!
Just his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. And his freedom. He belongs in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nobody gets it!!!
Powell had the Plame CIA file on the trip to Africa aboard Air Force One. Powell tells Dubya. Dubya calls Rove over and they proceed to plan their smear campaign. Everyone is hollering about Rove. Fuck Rove! Bush was THERE! Knew all along! The president approved the whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well...
...even if he didn't know then, he knows now.

Natch, he's currently violating national security by not investigating and putting a stop to the leaks. In short, he's affirmatively telling his staff that it's OK to leak classified materials.

More than enough to revoke his clearance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I think I saw that this happened before Rove had security clearance
I wonder if Powell knew that gw*dipshit told Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No DUplicitous DUpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I agree...Here is the questions that the WH press should ask to trap Bush
I found this as a post under this article at motherjones:
http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2005/07/mclellan_stonew.html

This was posted by Twood: (I fixed the spelling)

"The Washington Press is actually quite stupid; they keep ramming into the wall that is McClellan the same way every time. What they should do is ask him if Bush had anything to do with the leak. See if McClellan pleads the 5th on that one. If he doesn't, they got him. (McClellan: "That's preposterous" Press Corp: "Aha! You commented on the case!") If he does, that's a great headline: BUSH A FELON? "No comment", says WH Spokesman."

Makes sense to me..


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. yes, it's called IMPEACHMENT
let's do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes, of course, but security clearance is not all that hard to get anyway
my ex has it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, I like it...because
Edited on Sat Jul-16-05 07:21 PM by jmowreader
Article II, Section 1, Clause 6, (on edit: add "of the Constitution of the United States of America" after "Clause 6") discusses removing the president for "inability to discharge the powers and duties of said office."

A president who has no security clearance--hence no access to classified material--is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office." This would put Shrub back in Crawford FAR quicker and more surely than impeachment would.

The only problem is, you'd also have to remove the clearances of Cheney and the rest of his gang of thieves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. A military deserter shouldn't have a clearance
Obviously nobody does a background check on him and he sees all this anyway so how can a clearance be pulled if he doesn't have one and couldn't get one anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alien8ed Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Umm-hmm.
And would somebody please remember to finally revoke the clearances of his father's defunct administration, while they're at it?

They can ask Karl Rove for the mailing list, on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Bush's presidency should be revoked. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Of course
Edited on Sat Jul-16-05 10:29 PM by fujiyama
if Bush were to lose his security clearance, he really wouldn't be president, not that I'd have a problem with that. I don't see the office of the presidency functioning without having a security clearance.

And we know, nothing short of impeachment will make that happen (which is not going to happen under a republican controlled congress).

So for now, I'd settle with Rove losing his clearance - and preferably his job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC