I read this most recent spin from AP:
"WASHINGTON (AP) - After mentioning a CIA operative to a reporter, Bush confidant Karl Rove alerted the president's No. 2 security adviser about the interview and said he tried to steer the journalist away from allegations the operative's husband was making about faulty Iraq intelligence.
The July 11, 2003, e-mail between Rove and then-Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley is the first showing an intelligence official knew Rove had talked to Matthew Cooper just days before the Time magazine reporter divulged CIA officer Valerie Plame's secret identity.
``I didn't take the bait,'' Rove wrote in an e-mail obtained by The Associated Press, recounting how Cooper tried to question him about whether President Bush had been hurt by the new allegations.
The White House turned the e-mail over to prosecutors, and Rove testified to a grand jury about it last year."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5144579,00.htmlI read this over and over trying to make sense of it. But my final assessment is this:
THE WHITE HOUSE IS TOO INCOMPETENT TO KEEP A CIA AGENT'S IDENTITY COVERT!!!
And we trust them with nukes?
Wow, I feel better. :sarcasm: