Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove's new spin - 'I'm an incompetent boob!'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 07:15 PM
Original message
Rove's new spin - 'I'm an incompetent boob!'
I read this most recent spin from AP:

"WASHINGTON (AP) - After mentioning a CIA operative to a reporter, Bush confidant Karl Rove alerted the president's No. 2 security adviser about the interview and said he tried to steer the journalist away from allegations the operative's husband was making about faulty Iraq intelligence.

The July 11, 2003, e-mail between Rove and then-Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley is the first showing an intelligence official knew Rove had talked to Matthew Cooper just days before the Time magazine reporter divulged CIA officer Valerie Plame's secret identity.

``I didn't take the bait,'' Rove wrote in an e-mail obtained by The Associated Press, recounting how Cooper tried to question him about whether President Bush had been hurt by the new allegations.

The White House turned the e-mail over to prosecutors, and Rove testified to a grand jury about it last year."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5144579,00.html

I read this over and over trying to make sense of it. But my final assessment is this:

THE WHITE HOUSE IS TOO INCOMPETENT TO KEEP A CIA AGENT'S IDENTITY COVERT!!!

And we trust them with nukes?

Wow, I feel better. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who trusts them with nukes?
??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Good point.
Let me rephrase.

And we're supposed to trust them with nukes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is this the same 'Genus' the RW has been praising?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. It doesn't matter what Rove emailed to Hadley.
What matters is what he said to Cooper and what he said to Cooper was that Plame was CIA. He may not have been the original leaker but he was instrumental in blowing her cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well...
...based on this latest evidence, I think we should push to have the security clearance removed from EVERYONE in the White House. Based on this clown show, the country would be far better off if these fools didn't have access to anything more classified than TV Guide.

The level of incompetence is astounding - and I didn't expect much in the first place!

And my life and those of my children rest in those incompetent hands. :scared:

Words fail me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am still reading it over and over....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC