Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Edwards deliver North Carolina in the General?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JPJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:39 AM
Original message
Does Edwards deliver North Carolina in the General?
In 2000, North Carolina voted this way -

Bush 1,631,163

Gore 1,257,692

That's a huge gap to overcome. Do you think that Edwards on the ticket delivers NC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's hard to say at this point but he's more likely to deliver NC
than anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I think I saw a poll that said that 93% of NC'ians approve of his run.
He's also closer to Bush in NC than Clinton was to Bush in 91 and 92 in Ark at the same point -- and Ark, had gone Republican ever previous election since at least '68, except '76-Carter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastknowngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. NO red state
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. A dem can win
I don't think its Edwards. Independents (large number in recent years) never have completely warmed up to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. What Dem could win NC if Edwards can't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. If Clinton could win Ark in 92 and 96, Edwards can win NC.
Edited on Sun Jan-25-04 10:58 AM by AP
Prior to Clinton, NC and Ark had voted the same way since '68, and NC has got to be riper for the picking today than Ark was in '92. The Helms machine is gone, and it's a huge state (bigger than Mass) thanks to the fact that lots of people from Mass, NY, CT, etc, have moved there. Hell, they even have ice hockey in NC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. if he's the candidate, yes. if he's the VP, no.
don't forget, he did actually win this state to get where he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Never has fared well in head to head polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Dont think he can
My reason is that he isnt even going to run to hold his Senate seat if he loses in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. thats true
but statistically he's little different that the others. Once things are settled on our side then something more akin to the "unnamed dem" starts to take over and things even out.

Moreover, its only within the last two weeks that anyone has been paying any attention at all to him. And I believe that his fortunes have risen in the polls in that period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. He does better than Clintoln did vs Bush I.
Edited on Sun Jan-25-04 11:01 AM by AP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Got the numbers?
I can't remember them. I do know Clinton closed the numbers well in 96.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yes
The job losses (especially manufacturing) have been staggering in NC and people blame Bush. I happen to think that Dean (+ on guns) and Clark (+ miliatry experince) also can carry NC over Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I still hope he would
but a day doesn't go by hardly that readers don't write in to the people's forum of the News and Observer complaining about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I wrote positive post on the N&Os web site and every one was deleted.
Edited on Sun Jan-25-04 11:01 AM by AP
I guarantee you they have an editorial agenda that is so stalinistically carried out BECAUSE he has a chance to win NC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. ?????
They have been following him as if he were the only candidate running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. That's because of the local angle
I'm sure the Vermont papers are giving Dean considerably more coverage than the other candidates, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Mark my word
The News and Observer will endorse Edwards if his time comes. They don't endorse republicans for high office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Taxes will kill Dean there and you are generous with Clark's appeal
yes, they are mad but are they willing to surrender taxes for it ? no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Since I am on of the "theys"
I'll stand by my observations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeacherCreature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. No, I do not think he does
If NC goes democratic it will be because many people who have long since given up on voting come back to the democratic party. Edwards will not excite the base or bring in new voters. He is the typical pretty boy vacuous politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
21. Bottom line
maybe but doubtful. It's very hard to gage the anger over bush against what those that supported bush stand for in the rhealm of the tax cut lifts all boats dogma. One positive thing for the dems is that the dems do fine in elections other than the presidency itself. As far as Edwards goes, his support is solid with the party leaders and apparatus in NC, but split elsewhere. I'm not sure that he is more popular with the people than other dems such as Erskine Bowles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
22. The Way to Win the South
is to get out and register new voters. There are plenty of people out there who don't vote, and if the local Dem. committees are as lackluster as they are here in AR, we may have to bypass them entirely and concentrate on reaching new voters and disenchanted voters, possibly via the individual candidate's campaigns. They are out there-go get 'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. You're right we need to register new voters
but we also need to energize the voters we already have, particularly minorities, who feel no enthusiasm for the party. We have more than enough voters already on the rolls to kick Bush out in a landslide. The key is to get them motivated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC