Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Apology Demanded for Remark on U.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
twenty4blackbirds Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:55 PM
Original message
NYT: Apology Demanded for Remark on U.S.
aka, Leading Republican defends abusive treatment of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay
Senator John W. Warner, chairman of the Armed Services Committee (78) "our men and women in uniform who are fighting for the safety of all of us here at home."

actual text: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/17/politics/17gitmo.html?pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. An apology should not be expected when one has spoken the truth.
Warner's out of line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. You'll get an apology
as soon as you freaks apologize for putting our men and women (including National Guard troops who are desperately needed here for fire-fighting efforts, among other things) in harm's way based upon a lie.

Thank you,

The American Voter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, cripes
John Warner's one of our Senators here in VA - the other is the headcase moran George Allen - and I just recently wondered if he was starting to lose it. He's getting up there in years, and last time I saw him on TV, he was starting to look a little dotty.

Yeah, those poor soldiers of ours in Iraq are "fighting for the safety of all of us here at home."

OK, he's officially dotty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Durbin should stand firm in his refusal to apologize
for deliberate distortions of his words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. They aren't fighting for *us*. They're fighting for *'s business buddies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Senator Warner, I demand you apologize for allowing Rev. Moon
to have a coronation ceremony in an office paid for with my tax dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wait until the next round of Abu Ghraib photos come out
Edited on Fri Jun-17-05 04:30 PM by reality based
and then talk to me about apologies. Maybe Durbin could then repeat verbatim his recent comments and stare hard at the former Mr Elizabeth Taylor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'll apologize as soon as Bush answers the DSM questions Conyers gave him
If I were "King" of the Democrats, that is what I would have him say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC