Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean's Mistake: missing qualifiers and framing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 07:40 PM
Original message
Dean's Mistake: missing qualifiers and framing
Edited on Wed Jun-08-05 07:44 PM by Clarkie1
The mistake Dean made was that he didn't qualifiy the word "Christian." "Radical religious right," or as Clark puts it "the Christian wrong" would have been a more effective, precise, and tent-expanding message.

I think Dean is doing a good job as chair, but I don't think the words he chose yesterday were sufficient to deliver the message in the best possible way.

This is not an attack on Dean, I supported him as chair and still do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think he used the right words
remember with the Schiavo case ...that was a whole entire White wing base working here in Florida.........he knew this was true

as those of us who were inconvenienced by it.

Totally WHITE Wing NUTS.....I'm just sorry he didn't go farther and say these groups should be taxed if they want to get into the political game!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He didn't qualify the word "Christian"
That's my only problem with it.

The message would have been better and more effective if he had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree with your assessment
I think he (and we) should hate the game not the playa'.

Speak more to the many, many "sins" of today's Republican party, and less on personalities or generalized descriptions of people within the party. Goodness knows if he did that he'd have enough material to talk about to last a life time.

I know people will argue that if he did that he wouldn't be getting the massive attention he's now getting, and I see that point but that's just my opinion. Ain't nobody listening to me anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nankerphelge Donating Member (995 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Christian left is a myth
We need new religious institutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "The Christian Left is a Myth"
That is exactly the meme Dean's unfortunate statement will promote.

Christ was a radical liberal leftie, and that's the message we need to get through to people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Kerr Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Why point that out at all?
Strictly speaking, the message, in whatever words you phrase it, that the large majority of Republicans are Christians is true.

Was it the right thing to say though? I think that Dean was mis-guided in saying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. so how would you characterize the "diversity" of the Repukes
if asked directly to do so?

I'm waiting . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. 21% of white evangelical Christians voted for Kerry.
And that's not counting all the minorities. Want to create a Republican super-mandate next time, by pushing them over? They're working on it by serving low-income communities through the faith-based initiative, and using aggressive rhetoric about religion from our side to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I've never been called mythological before
Still waiting for my super power though.

We're here, and we'll be damned if we'll let the Republicans own God. How can someone be against "persons of faith" Sen. Frist, when that someone IS a person of faith.

I gots a whole church fulla Democrats who'd probably like to pick a bone with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Well, Color Me Part Of The "Myth" Then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. So, black people don't count?
Edited on Wed Jun-08-05 08:59 PM by theboss
I wish people would remember that 85 to 90 percent of blacks vote for us...and they are by church attendance, the most religious group of people in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. Black people are not, by any stretch of the imagination, "the left" EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. And if we lose 10 percent of them, there is no Democratic Party
Attacking religion might be the way to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #26
38. 10% of the black electorate is 0.8% of the democratic vote.
Hardly the deconstruction of the party that you envision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
36. unfortunately for the Christian left
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 09:40 AM by GreenArrow
being a Christian dictates that one cannot use the same sort of tactics and strategies that the so-called Christian right does; i.e., lying, slandering, cheating, diss-a-sembling, and so forth. The right succeeds becuase it is vicious and unprincipled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sooner75 Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Issues
I'd like to see Howard Dean succeed as DNC chair.

I'd also like to see him stick to the issues and resist the enormous temptation to resort to characterizations like the "white Christian" one. (Even if it's 100% true, it's not going to help our cause.)

If we're going to beat the Republicans, we're going to do it by challenging them on our issues. Embryonic stem cell research is a good example. We've got the high ground on that one and, they know it. The majority of Americans WANT that research to go forward.

Characterizing them just won't work. Showing that we've got a better public policy agenda on a number of issues WILL.

I'd like to see Howard Dean step back, take a deep breath, dust himself off, and press for our issues. He did that quite well on the campaign trail in 2004. I know that he can make our issues stick. THEN, we'll see 'em squirm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. He always speaks out on things that matter to voters
Dean does stick to the issues!

Out of 1000 statements and assertions, there are probably a handful of the type of characterizations you describe. It is up to us to keep the attention on what he is saying. The analstocracy will do everything in their power to shift attention to the petty and trivial. They will only succeed if we, and the leaders in the party like Biden, take the bait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. he was asked a direct question about the diversity of the 2 parties
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 05:46 AM by ima_sinnic
. . . how would YOU answer it? he shouldn't speak the truth? Frankly I'd MUCH rather hear an answer like that -- blunt, to the point, and right on the mark -- than some namby-pamby, "politicially correct" and morally bankrupt, dishonest appeasing middle-of-the-road statement that only EMPOWERS the loonies in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sooner75 Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Knowing what to say and what NOT to say
The "white Christian" comment just wasn't smart. OK?

He's in a high visibility position and, he's gotta do better than that. That's what Biden, Edwards and others have been saying about this.

If asked, "How do you see thee diversity within the two major political parties?" I think the way to answer that is to say: "I see a lot more diversity in the Democratic Party. We've always been the party that reaches out and listens to the concerns of Hispanic people, black people, white people, urban people, rural people, women, men, Christians, Jews, Muslims... We want everyone to have a voice. Frankly, I don't see the Republican Party trying to achieve that kind of diversity."

Notice I characterized OUR diversity, but didn't really say much about theirs. Nothing for the talking heads to latch onto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #23
34. whatever. if you know what the DNC chair should say, maybe
you should go for the job -- or become an aide or speechwriter or something.

and what you said would have gotten NO PRESS and would have been shrugged off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
31. Don't regurgitate the Rightwing talking points
Geez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. I would agree Except
He would not have gotten the media exposure if he qualified his statement. He played it right to get the attention of the main stream media.

Dean gets to be the bold brash leftie garnering support from the dem base and the dem representative get their mugs on tv while distancing themselves just a tad from Dean's rhetoric.

IMHO this is excellent Dem strategy.

Way to go Dean and Way to go Dems!

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. And if Dean had said republicans live in all 50 states, they would
have attacked him and distorted the statement. The fact is as far as the republicans are concerned it doesn't matter what Dean says, its all going to be turned into something they can use against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Maybe that should be his next statement
Just to watch them spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. And it's up to us to turn the tables on them
Sure, they will try to make mountains out of molehills.

It is up to us to turn the tables on them. If we don't take the bait, and use each attach as an opportunity to talk about something that is actually important to voters, we defang them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Your problem is you are running with failure
Failure is what that nice guy act gets us.

Im sick of doing the nice guy act.

Its a recipe for failure in politics. People in this country think were weak because of this dainty BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. Stop taking the Bait!!
Edited on Wed Jun-08-05 08:53 PM by pat_k
Dean {should have/shouldn't have] said it. Who cares!

Don't take the bait!

The minute you start talking about whether or not it was a mistake, you are on their turf ("not a mistake" assertions are akin to "don't think of an elephant" i.e., you are in the "mistake" frame).

So, what do we do? (You might ask)

There is no need to say anything about the bits the analstocracy are obsessed with. Simply go on the attack and shift attention to the substance of his remarks.

It is wrong for certain classes of voters to face an eight hour wait to cast a ballot. At "Take Back America" Dean spoke out against this terrible wrong. He was right on. Hours-long poll-tax-lines for poor, minority voters AND none for affluent, white voters is intolerable.

His remarks in context:

We need to be the party of election reform. We ought to do everything we can to make it easier for more Americans to vote. The Republicans are all about suppressing votes; two voting machines if you live in a black district, 10 voting machines if you live in a white district. I think every single American ought to be able to vote! I used to say in the campaign -- I meant this sincerely -- I would rather have you go out and vote, even if you vote Republican, than stay home. I really would…

"You -- you know, the idea that you have to wait on line for eight hours to cast your ballot in Florida -- there's something the matter with that. You think people can work all day and then pick up their kids at child care or wherever, and get home and then have a -- still manage to sandwich in an eight-hour vote? Well, Republicans, I guess, can do that, because a lot of them have never made an honeI am hoping that youwill help shift attention to the REAL scandal.st living in their lives. <b>But for ordinary working people, who have to work eight hours a day, they have kids, they got to get home to those kids, the idea of making them stand for eight hours to cast their ballot for democracy is wrong.



When the analstocracy went after him for the "honest living" comment, they handed us an opportunity to shift the focus to the real scandal: the Republican policy of systematic vote suppression. Mehlman even told us that he planned to employ suppression part of an all out effort to "do whatever we can to help make sure Jerry Kilgore becomes the next governor of the state” (see http://www.democrats.org/news/200505310003.html ).

Dean is standing up for free and fair elections. Mehlman seeks to undermine democracy by selectively challenging voters who intend to cast their vote for an opponent.

Instead of getting caught up in the Dean bashing game, we move to our turf by talking about the horrors of the last election and pointing out Mehlman's much more serious sins against democracy.

Over and over again, Mehlman plays by the Norquist playbook, where the ends justify the means. We saw it when he violated the law as Bush-Cheney campaign manager (http://eqs.sdrdc.com/eqsdocs/00002BFD.pdf ), and more recently, when he attempted to use deceit to conceal deceit on Meet the press. (His demonstrably false claim that disclosures in the Downing Street Memo "have been totally discredited by everyone who's looked at it. See http://mediamatters.org/items/200506060008).

Get the complete transcript of what Dean had to say today. He ALWAYS raises substantive issues. Anytime they attack a "gaff" you just need to find the context, and shift attention to the points he made on things that really matter to voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howmad1 Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Right on!
Pat_k. Sure wish those who think Dean misspoke would sit down and enumerate the number of remarks spoken by rethuglicans against dems. So where was the outrage by DU'ers and dems? Come on folks, lets stop eating our own. Biden and Richardson are doing a great job for all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Here are a few gems from members of the GOP
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 02:32 AM by pat_k
Here are few gems from "Take Them at Their Words," by Bruce J Miller with Diana Maio.

I always see two Jewish communities in America, one of deep intellect and one of shallow, superficial intellect... Liberals are in my estimation just not bright people. They don't think deeply; they don't comprehend; they have a narrow education base, as opposed to the hard scientists... --Dick Army AP 9-24-02

Mr. Clinton better watch it if he comes down here. He'd better have a body guard. --Jesse Helms, Boston Globe, 11-23-94

By the way, it's probably a good thing that Vice President Gore wasn't at Independence Hall in 1776! I bet he would have tried to talk Jefferson out of that risky independence scheme! --Gov. Tom Ridge PBS.org, 8-3-00

Today's Democrat leaders do not understand leadership. They reduce principles to tactics. They talk endlessly and confront nothing. They offer, not conviction, but alibies. They are paralysed by indecision, weakened by scandal, and guided only by the perpetuation of their own power. --Peramble to the Republican Party Platform, adopted 8-12-96

We're going to keep on building the party {the Texas GOP} until we are hunting Democrats with dogs. --Phil Gramm 8-95

We're the only nation in the world where all our poor people are fat. -- Phil Gram, 12-95

When I see someone who's making anywhere from $300,000 to $750,000 a year, that's middle class. --Rep. Fred Heinman (R-NC)

Note: Putting Heinman's comment in context. Although it is very tough to get a breakdown of the wealthest Americans (http://www.michaelparenti.org/Superrich.html), an analysis of the Bush tax plan back in 2000 indicated that the annual income for the top 1 percent (yes, that's one percent) of Americans started at $319.000 (http://www.ctj.org/html/bush0500.htm).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
24. I wonder if there are any Democrats in this group:
WHO- The White Camelia Knights of the Ku Klux Klan is a group of men and women (families) that share a common belief in religion and race. We are not the Knights of the White Kamellia, Ku Klux Klan. Neither do we have any affiliation to this organization.

WHAT- An organization of White Christians dedicated to the truth and education in a world of lies and ignorance.

WHERE- The White Camelia Knights of the Ku Klux Klan is based in Texas, but with membership spread throughout many other states.

WHEN- The original White Camelia was organized in 1867, two years after the original Ku Klux Klan was formed in Puluski, Tennessee. It has been reported that the White Camelia became larger than the original Ku Klux Klan in membership and power.

WHY- The White Camelia Knights of the Ku Klux Klan believes that White Christian ideals are under attack by anti-white and anti-Christ forces. We believe our race, country and our Christian way of life is being systematically destroyed.

HOW TO JOIN- Requirements for membership are simple. You must be 100% White, have an open mind to learn Christian Identity and be willing to follow Klan rules and regulations. For Requirements and Info on joining, Click Here.

....more... http://www.wckkkk.com/who.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
27. Mistake???....What mistake???
Go Dean!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
28. Very true, needs to need more Lakoff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
29. Oh please, you don't fire people up that way and the Right Wingers
seemingly always hit below the belt by promoting false patriotism, instilling fear and encouraging hatred and discrimination.

And you are DIS'ing Dr. Dean for NOT using qualifiers!?!

Wake up! Please wake up and realize that this is down and dirty HARDBALL, take no prisoners, politics now. We must play hard or be assimilated. Make your choice citizen! ;) <a little tongue in cheek>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
30. Dem Leaders mistake -- cowardice
All Biden, Edwards, Pelosi, etc. had to say when confronted with the Dean quote that the Media intentionally took out of context is this -- "I didn't hear Dean's speech for myself, but both Dean and I agree that Republican leaders and lawmakers are hurting America and working Americans."

"Offense is the best Defense." That is how you defend your fellow Dem who is being unfairly pilliored by the corporate controled Media and attack the Repukes at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
32. He didn't qualify and
as a result, it got more airplay and more people heard it.

I don't think it was a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. That's right.
It is more effective to just state the truth plainly. Christian "right" or "wrong" introduces an unecessary and contentious aspect into the basic fact that it is a Party of white Christians, which BTW, does not imply the converse that all white Christians are Republicans. Most people can figure out which white Christians are in the Republican Party without opening up a debate on Christianity. Save that for another time. :)

Really, he is addressing the diversity issue and the fact that the Republican Party does not stand for diversity, while the Democratic Party does, so, wake up people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
35. why do we have to parse every word the man says?
he is one of the FEW high-profile Democrats with the cajones to say it like it is. This quality is what made him a star in the primaries (until subverted by DLC/media/pukes) and brought in record-breaking amounts of cash. He is still succeeding in bringing in the dough and in galvanizing the grassroots. He was asked a direct question about diversity and answered it honestly. His overt hatred of the Republican agenda and way of doing things is pretty much exactly the way we here on DU see the situation. So GO HOWARD GO, DON'T GIVE THEM ANY SLACK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
37. He should have said white, born-again, evangelical Christians...
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 09:41 AM by Lone_Wolf
But still, I suspect that the only people who were offended by Dean's statement were people who think of themselves as white, Christians. Namely white, born-again, evangelical Christians.

An interesting tidbit is, people who identify themselves as born-again, evangelical Christians only make up 7% of the American population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC