Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will the media ever start discussing real issues again?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 10:33 AM
Original message
Poll question: Will the media ever start discussing real issues again?
Or are they going to continue talking about Dean's "screaming speech" for the entire campaign?

This phenomenon is verging on the surreal. Just as a side question (no polling), does anyone else feel like they're in a dream or on drugs or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. the REAL issues is asking general Clark about Michael Moore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL you see? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maha writes about this today...
Snip:

Dukakis was hounded by a small group of anti-abortion rights activists who made noisy demonstrations at most of his speeches. And the television news would show footage of the demonstrators, then mention in passing that Dukakis had delivered a major policy speech on thus-and-so. This would be followed up by man-on-the-street interviews of random voters, who complained they had no idea how the candidates stood on the issues.

Even then, it didn't hit me that most journalists were nothing but cheap streetwalkers until the the race for the Democratic nomination in 1991-1992. I watched a particularly lively debate among Democratic candidates featuring sharp exchanges on several critical policy issues. Immediately after the debate, the cameras turned on a gaggle of pundits watching from a television studio. As I watched, expecting analysis of what had just happened, an obviously bored Cokie Roberts turned to the others and asked if they thought Mario Cuomo might decide to run.

The whole pack of them spent half an hour in gossipy chatter about Mario Cuomo, who wasn't there, ignoring the actual candidates, who included the future President of the United States, Bill Clinton.

And the quality of political journalism keeps getting worse.

(You can read the whole, insightful piece here (slow loading for dial-up):
http://www.mahablog.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Don't they realize that there's a WAR going on? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. No. Now that Kerry is considered by most the front runner,
the big news will be Skull and Bones, and his haircuts.

Bring a round of Bull and Scones for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. No, of course not
Real issues take work. This just takes a video edit and an opinion.

Everyone talks about a media bias. I agree that there is a bias. I think the bias is towards the easiest thing to do that might get the ratings up. Gotcha's are easy.

Step One: "OH MY GOODNESS, did you see IT?"

Step Two: "WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?" (repeat very often)

Step Three: "Have we covered this too much?" (repeat clip more often and by doing so, cover it way too much)

Step Four: "What impact does our covering it too much have?" (repeat clip often with associated hand wringing about media losing credibility)

Step Five: "All of the coverage seems to be backfiring" (conclusion we, the media, have lost all credibility on this and need to drop it)

It is the cable news cycle. It plays out +/- like this on any number of issues many times a year. The thing they really like about steps 2 through 5 is that no one actually has to leave the office to dig up new information.

In the interim the war and a billion other meaningful issues go largely uncovered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Great post. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm Not Sure They Aren't Following Us
Edited on Sat Jan-24-04 11:20 AM by Crisco
I posted several threads this morning about the candidates energy policies. One for each candidate.

count the reponses - not including my own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snoochie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. "again"?!
Edited on Sat Jan-24-04 12:47 PM by snoochie
What the hell? When were they EVER talking about the issues?

I don't feel like I'm living in a dream - this is the way it is under Reagan's screwjob on the Fairness Doctrine, Clinton's Telecom Act, and the consistent monopolization of the media by huge multinational corporations.

I do wonder why you think this is in any way a diversion from their SOP. I really do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sadly, they never did talk about issues
All I've heard from TV is "horserace horserace horserace".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snoochie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well, you have to have an eye/ear for detail.
I did get a little more out of it... for me it was:

"horserace (single vegan) horserace (hairstyle) horserace (sweater) horserace (scream) horserace (other assorted NON issue) horserace blah blah blah blah blah we love fat paychecks so we're NOT going to do our jobs so screw you America I got mine!"


Oh, wait... that last part wasn't spoken, but I inferred it nonetheless. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC